-
21 knowledge
['noli‹]1) (the fact of knowing: She was greatly encouraged by the knowledge that she had won first prize in the competition.) conhecimento2) (information or what is known: He had a vast amount of knowledge about boats.) conhecimento3) (the whole of what can be learned or found out: Science is a branch of knowledge about which I am rather ignorant.) conhecimento•- general knowledge* * *knowl.edge[n'ɔlidʒ] n 1 conhecimento, entendimento. it is public knowledge / é de conhecimento público. how came it to your knowledge? / como veio ao seu conhecimento? 2 saber, sabedoria. knowledge is power / saber é poder. 3 ciência, erudição, instrução. 4 compreensão, experiência. a superficial knowledge conhecimento superficial. general knowledge cultura geral. to one’s knowledge até onde se sabe. to the best of my knowledge que eu saiba. -
22 public
['pʌblɪk] 1. adjpubliczny; support, interest społeczny; spending, official państwowy2. nthe public — ( people in general) społeczeństwo nt; ( particular set of people) publiczność f
the general public — ( society) ogół społeczeństwa; (readers, viewers etc) szeroka publiczność
to go public ( COMM) — wystawiać (wystawić perf) akcje na sprzedaż
* * *(of, for, or concerning, the people (of a community or nation) in general: a public library; a public meeting; Public opinion turned against him; The public announcements are on the back page of the newspaper; This information should be made public and not kept secret any longer.) publiczny- publicly- publicity
- publicize
- publicise
- public holiday
- public house
- public relations
- public service announcement
- public spirit
- public-spirited
- public transport
- in public
- the public
- public opinion poll -
23 public ***** pub·lic
['pʌblɪk]1. adj(gen) pubblico (-a), (Comm: industry) statalehe's a public figure; he's in public life — è un personaggio della vita pubblica
to make sth public — render noto or di pubblico dominio qc
to be in the public eye — essere una persona molto in vista, essere un personaggio in vista
2. nthe sporting/reading public — il pubblico sportivo/dei lettori
-
24 knowledge engineering
English-Russian big medical dictionary > knowledge engineering
-
25 knowledge information network
recognition network — распознающая сеть; схема распознавания
public network — общедоступная сеть; сеть общего пользования
network topology — топологическая схема сети; топология сети
English-Russian big medical dictionary > knowledge information network
-
26 dominio
dominio sustantivo masculino 1 2a) (Hist, Pol) dominionb)3 (Inf) domain
dominio sustantivo masculino
1 (poder) control: tiene mucho dominio de sí mismo, he's very self-controlled
2 (conocimiento profundo) command, grasp
3 (ámbito, campo) scope, sphere
4 (territorio) lands (colonias) colonies Locuciones: ser de dominio público, to be public knowledge ' dominio' also found in these entries: Spanish: absoluta - absoluto - contención - control - lastre - pública - público - señorío - garra English: astonishing - command - domain - dominion - excellent - mastery - out - preserve - realm - rule - self-command - self-composure - self-control - self-restraint - stranglehold - sway - control - dominance - hold - public - self - strangle -
27 wide
1. adjective1) (broad) breit; groß [Unterschied, Abstand, Winkel, Loch]; weit [Kleidung]allow or leave a wide margin — (fig.) viel Spielraum lassen
2) (extensive) weit; umfassend [Lektüre, Wissen, Kenntnisse]; weit reichend [Einfluss]; vielseitig [Interessen]; groß [Vielfalt, Bekanntheit, Berühmtheit]; reichhaltig [Auswahl, Sortiment]; breit [Publizität]the wide world — die weite Welt
3) (liberal) großzügig4) (fully open) weit geöffnet5) (off target)be wide of the mark — (fig.) [Annahme, Bemerkung:] nicht zutreffen
2. adverbyou're wide of the mark — (fig.) du liegst falsch (ugs.)
1) (fully) weitwide awake — hellwach; (fig. coll.) gewitzt
2) (off target)fall wide of the target, go wide — das Ziel verfehlen
aim wide/wide of something — daneben/neben etwas (Akk.) zielen
* * *1. adjective1) (great in extent, especially from side to side: wide streets; Her eyes were wide with surprise.) breit, weit2) (being a certain distance from one side to the other: This material is three metres wide; How wide is it?) breit3) (great or large: He won by a wide margin.) groß4) (covering a large and varied range of subjects etc: a wide experience of teaching.) reich2. adverb(with a great distance from top to bottom or side to side: He opened his eyes wide.) weit- academic.ru/82279/widely">widely- widen
- wideness
- width
- wide-ranging
- widespread
- give a wide berth to
- give a wide berth
- wide apart
- wide awake
- wide open* * *[waɪd]I. adj2. (considerable) enorm, beträchtlichthere's a \wide gap between... and... zwischen... und... herrscht eine große Kluftthe [great] \wide world die [große] weite Welthis eyes were \wide with surprise seine Augen waren vor Erstaunen weit aufgerissenthe swimming pool is 5 metres \wide der Swimmingpool ist 5 Meter breit5. (varied) breit gefächerta \wide range of goods ein großes Sortiment an Waren6. (extensive) großto enjoy \wide support breite Unterstützung genießen7.▶ to give sb/sth a \wide berth um jdn/etw einen großen Bogen machenII. adv weit\wide apart weit auseinanderto open \wide [sich akk] weit öffnenhis eyes opened \wide with surprise seine Augen waren vor Erstaunen weit aufgerissen“open \wide”, said the dentist „weit aufmachen“, sagte der Zahnarztshe longed for the \wide open spaces of her homeland sie sehnte sich nach der großen Weite ihres Heimatlandesto be \wide open weit geöffnet sein; ( fig) competition völlig offen sein; (offering opportunities) offenstehen; (vulnerable) verletzbarto be \wide open to attack dem Angriff schutzlos ausgeliefert sein* * *[waɪd]1. adj (+er)it is three feet wide — es ist drei Fuß breit; (material) es liegt drei Fuß breit; (room) es ist drei Fuß in der Breite
2) (= considerable, comprehensive) difference, variety groß; experience, choice reich, umfangreich; public, knowledge, range breit; interests vielfältig, breit gefächert; coverage of report umfassend; network weitverzweigt; circulation weit, groß; question weitreichend, weit reichendyou're a bit wide there — da liegst du etwas daneben
a wide ball (Cricket) — ein Ball, der nicht in Reichweite des Schlagmanns aufspringt
it was wide of the target — es verpasste das Ziel, es ging daneben
2. adv1) (= extending far) weitSee:→ far2) (= fully) weitthe general/writer left himself wide open to attack — der General/Verfasser hat sich (überhaupt) nicht gegen Angriffe abgesichert
the law is wide open to criticism/abuse — das Gesetz bietet viele Ansatzpunkte für Kritik/öffnet dem Missbrauch Tür und Tor
3) (= far from the target) danebento go wide of sth — über etw (acc) hinausgehen, an etw (dat) vorbeigehen
* * *wide [waıd]2. weit, ausgedehnt:a wide public ein breites Publikum;the wide world die weite Welt3. figa) ausgedehnt, umfassend, umfangreich, weitreichendb) reich (Erfahrung, Wissen etc):wide culture umfassende Bildung;wide reading große Belesenheit4. groß, beträchtlich (Unterschied etc)5. weit(läufig, -gehend), auch weitherzig, großzügig:a wide generalization eine starke oder grobe Verallgemeinerung;take wide views weitherzig oder großzügig sein6. weit offen, aufgerissen (Augen)7. weit, lose (Kleidung)10. Br sl gerissen, schlauB adv1. breit2. weit:wide apart weit auseinander;a) weit offen,c) fig schutzlos,3. daneben…:go wide vorbei-, danebengehen (Schuss etc);shoot wide SPORT vorbei-, danebenschießenC s (das) Äußerste:to the wide bis zum Äußersten, vollkommenw. abk1. weight2. wide3. width4. wife5. with* * *1. adjective1) (broad) breit; groß [Unterschied, Abstand, Winkel, Loch]; weit [Kleidung]allow or leave a wide margin — (fig.) viel Spielraum lassen
2) (extensive) weit; umfassend [Lektüre, Wissen, Kenntnisse]; weit reichend [Einfluss]; vielseitig [Interessen]; groß [Vielfalt, Bekanntheit, Berühmtheit]; reichhaltig [Auswahl, Sortiment]; breit [Publizität]3) (liberal) großzügig4) (fully open) weit geöffnet5) (off target)be wide of the mark — (fig.) [Annahme, Bemerkung:] nicht zutreffen
2. adverbyou're wide of the mark — (fig.) du liegst falsch (ugs.)
1) (fully) weitwide awake — hellwach; (fig. coll.) gewitzt
2) (off target)fall wide of the target, go wide — das Ziel verfehlen
aim wide/wide of something — daneben/neben etwas (Akk.) zielen
* * *adj.breit adj.weit adj. -
28 общеизвестный
прил. well-known, generally known;
notorious;
known to all общеизвестный факт ≈ notorious factобщеизвестн|ый - well-known, notorious, of common/public knowledge;
~ые факты well-known facts, generally known facts.Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > общеизвестный
-
29 улица
жен. street на улице ≈ in the street;
(вне дома) out of doors;
outside, outdoors он живет на улице Горького в доме номер десять ≈ he lives at number ten Gorky Street широкая улица ≈ broad street, wide street центральная улица, главная улица ≈ high street брит., амер. main street, разг. main drag будет и на нашей улице праздник ≈ our day will come выбрасывать, выкидывать, вышвыривать на улицу ≈ to throw smb. out (on, in the street), to kick smb. out выносить на улицу ≈ to make smth. public knowledge очутиться на улице ≈ to be out in the street;
to get/have the key of the street человек с улицы ≈ any passer-by, a man off the street зеленая улица ≈ (разрешение на беспрепятственное прохождение работы, проекта и т. п.) green light (all the way), clear passage узкая улица ≈ narrow streetулиц|а - ж. street;
на ~е in the street;
(вне помещения) outside, out of doors;
outdoors;
выйти на ~у go* out/outside;
войти с ~ы come* in (from outdoors) ;
по ~е along the street;
жить на ~е Пушкина в доме 12 live at 12, Pushkin Street;
выгнать кого-л. на ~у turn smb. out;
очутиться на ~е be* thrown out on the street. -
30 unhappiness
noun infelicidadunhappiness n tristeza / infelicidadtr[ʌn'hæpɪnəs]unhappiness [.ʌn'hæpinəs] n: infelicidad f, tristeza f, desdicha fn.• desdicha s.f.• infelicidad s.f.• tristeza s.f.'ʌn'hæpinəs, ʌn'hæpinɪsmass nouna) ( lack of happiness) infelicidad f; ( stronger) desdicha f; ( sadness) tristeza fb) ( dissatisfaction) descontento m[ʌn'hæpɪnɪs]N1) (=sadness) desdicha f, tristeza f ; (=absence of happiness) infelicidad fI don't want to cause more unhappiness to you both — no quiero causarles más desdicha a los dos, no quiero ser más motivo de infelicidad para los dos
the unhappiness of their marriage was public knowledge — la infelicidad de su matrimonio era del dominio público
2) (=dissatisfaction) descontento mthey expressed their unhappiness with or over the decision — expresaron su descontento con respecto a la decisión
* * *['ʌn'hæpinəs, ʌn'hæpinɪs]mass nouna) ( lack of happiness) infelicidad f; ( stronger) desdicha f; ( sadness) tristeza fb) ( dissatisfaction) descontento m -
31 Pedro of Avis, prince
(1392-1449)One of the many talented sons of King João I and Philippa of Lancaster, regent and older brother of Prince Henry of Aviz (Prince Henry the Navigator). Pedro's life and work were important in consolidating an independent Portuguese monarchy and in promoting the maritime discoveries and explorations down the coast of Africa. Well-educated for a member of royalty in his day, Infante Dom Pedro was present as a warrior at the auspicious conquest of Ceuta in Morocco in 1415, and was named Duke of Coimbra that same year. From 1425 to 1428, he traveled and studied in Europe, including in England, Germany, Hungary, Italy, and Aragon and Castile. He returned from his travels with a copy of Marco Polo's famous book and introduced this to his country.Among royalty and nobility, Prince Pedro's views were cautious regarding further Portuguese expansion in Morocco, and during the troubled times of 1436-38, he opposed the planned but ill-fated attack on the Moroccan city of Tangier; he called for the surrender later of Ceuta, in order to ransom the life of Prince Fernando, a prisoner in Moroccan hands. Following the death of King Duarte in 1438 and the subsequent succession crisis, including a civil war among factions, Prince Pedro acted as regent until 1446, when Prince Afonso reached his majority and was acclaimed King Afonso V, called "The African" (r. 1446-81).After Prince Pedro's powers were given up finally in 1448, his formerly exiled enemies returned to Portugal and vowed vengeance against him. Warfare ensued and, with the defeat of his army at the battle of Alfarrobeira in 1449, Prince Pedro was killed. His many accomplishments and talents off the battlefields were forgotten over the generations. Beginning in the late 19th century, the memory of his distinction and greatness was increasingly obscured by the growing fame, legend, and myth of his younger brother, Prince Henry of Aviz (Prince Henry the Navigator). An effort to rehabilitate the memory and public knowledge of Prince Pedro began in the early 1960s among a handful of foreign scholars, and was carried on by Portuguese scholars in the 1990s, but it appeared to have little effect against the pervasive cult of Prince Henry the Navigator. -
32 system
1) система || системный3) вчт операционная система; программа-супервизор5) вчт большая программа6) метод; способ; алгоритм•system halted — "система остановлена" ( экранное сообщение об остановке компьютера при наличии серьёзной ошибки)
- CPsystem- H-system- h-system- hydrogen-air/lead battery hybrid system- Ksystem- Lsystem- L*a*b* system- master/slave computer system- p-system- y-system- Δ-system -
33 common
'komən
1. adjective1) (seen or happening often; quite normal or usual: a common occurrence; These birds are not so common nowadays.) corriente2) (belonging equally to, or shared by, more than one: This knowledge is common to all of us; We share a common language.) común3) (publicly owned: common property.) público4) (coarse or impolite: She uses some very common expressions.) ordinario5) (of ordinary, not high, social rank: the common people.) corriente6) (of a noun, not beginning with a capital letter (except at the beginning of a sentence): The house is empty.) común
2. noun((a piece of) public land for everyone to use, with few or no buildings: the village common.) tierras comunales- commoner- common knowledge
- common law
- common-law
- commonplace
- common-room
- common sense
- the Common Market
- the House of Commons
- the Commons
- in common
common adj comúntr['kɒmən]1 (ordinary, average) corriente2 (usual, not scarce) común, corriente■ it's quite common for mothers to suffer from postnatal depression es bastante común que las madres padezcan una depresión posparto3 (shared, joint) común■ for the common good por el bien común, por el bien de todos4 pejorative (vulgar) ordinario,-a1 (land) campo comunal, terreno comunal, tierras nombre femenino plural comunales\SMALLIDIOMATIC EXPRESSION/SMALLas common as dirt / as common as muck muy ordinario,-acommon or garden normal y corrientein common en comúnin common with (like) al igual queto be common knowledge ser de dominio públicoto have something in common with somebody tener algo en común con alguiento make common cause with somebody hacer causa común con alguiencommon decency educación nombre femeninocommon denominator denominador nombre masculino comúncommon factor factor nombre masculino comúncommon law derecho consuetudinarioCommon Market Mercado Comúncommon noun nombre nombre masculino comúncommon room SMALLBRITISH ENGLISH/SMALL sala de reunióncommon sense sentido comúncommon time SMALLMUSIC/SMALL cuatro por cuatrothe common touch el contacto con el pueblocommon ['kɑmən] adj1) public: común, públicothe common good: el bien común2) shared: comúna common interest: un interés común3) general: común, generalit's common knowledge: todo el mundo lo sabe4) ordinary: ordinario, común y corrientethe common man: el hombre medio, el hombre de la callecommon n1) : tierra f comunal2)in common : en comúnadj.• adocenado, -a adj.• burdo, -a adj.• común adj.• consuetudinario, -a adj.• frecuente adj.• genérico, -a adj.• ramplón, -ona adj.• regular adj.• usual adj.
I 'kɑːmən, 'kɒmən1)a) (widespread, prevalent) común, corriente(to be) in common use — (ser*) de uso corriente
b) (average, normal) < soldier> rasothe common man — el hombre medio or de la calle
c) (low class, vulgar) ordinario2)a) (shared, mutual) comúncommon ground — puntos mpl en común or de coincidencia
to be common TO something — ser* común a algo
b) ( public)the common good — el bien común or de todos
II
1) u (in phrases)to have something in common (with somebody) — tener* algo en común (con alguien)
['kɒmǝn]in common with — (as prep) al igual que; see also Commons
1. ADJ1) (=usual, ordinary) [event, experience, name, species] común, corriente; [misconception, mistake] común, frecuentethis butterfly is common in Spain — esta mariposa es común or corriente en España
it is common for these animals to die young — es corriente or frecuente que estos animales mueran jóvenes
•
it is a common belief that... — es una creencia extendida or generalizada que...common belief has it that... — según la opinión generalizada...
•
the common man — el hombre de la calle, el hombre medio•
it is common practice in the USA — es una práctica común en EE.UU.•
pigeons are a common sight in London — es corriente or frecuente ver palomas en Londres2) (=shared) [cause, aim, language] comúnto work for a common aim — cooperar para un mismo fin or para un objetivo común
•
for the common good — para el bien común, para el bien de todos•
they discussed several issues of common interest — hablaron de varios asuntos de interés común or de interés mutuo•
it is common knowledge that... — es del dominio público que...•
the desire for freedom is common to all people — todo el mundo comparte el deseo de la libertad4) (Zool, Bot) común2. N1) (=land) campo m comunal, ejido m2) (Brit)(Pol) house 1., 3)3)in common: we have a lot in common (with other people) — tenemos mucho en común (con otra gente)
in common with many other companies, we advertise in the local press — al igual que otras muchas empresas, nos anunciamos en la prensa local
3.CPDcommon cold N — resfriado m común
common core N — (Scol) (also: common-core syllabus) asignaturas fpl comunes
common currency N —
to become/be common currency — [idea, belief] convertirse en/ser moneda corriente
common denominator N — (Math) común denominador m
Common Entrance N — (Brit) (Scol) examen de acceso a un colegio de enseñanza privada
common factor N — (Math) factor m común
common land N — propiedad f comunal
common-lawcommon law N — (Jur) (established by custom) derecho m consuetudinario; (based on precedent) jurisprudencia f
common noun N — nombre m común
common ownership N — (=joint ownership) copropiedad f ; (Pol) (=collective ownership) propiedad f colectiva
common room N — (esp Brit) (for students) sala f de estudiantes; (for teachers) sala f de profesores
common salt N — sal f común
commonsensecommon sense N — sentido m común
common stock N — (US) (St Ex) acciones fpl ordinarias
common time N — (Mus) cuatro m por cuatro
COMMON LAW Se llama common law o case law (derecho consuetudinario o jurisprudencia), al conjunto de leyes basadas en el fallo de los tribunales, a diferencia de las leyes establecidas por escrito en el Parlamento. El derecho consuetudinario inglés se desarrolló después de la conquista normanda, cuando los jueces basaban sus decisiones en la tradición o en el precedente judicial. La jurisprudencia sigue usándose como base del sistema legal anglosajón, aunque va perdiendo vigencia por el desarrollo del derecho escrito.common wall N — pared f medianera
See:see cultural note ACT OF PARLIAMENT in act,see cultural note CONSTITUTION in constitution* * *
I ['kɑːmən, 'kɒmən]1)a) (widespread, prevalent) común, corriente(to be) in common use — (ser*) de uso corriente
b) (average, normal) < soldier> rasothe common man — el hombre medio or de la calle
c) (low class, vulgar) ordinario2)a) (shared, mutual) comúncommon ground — puntos mpl en común or de coincidencia
to be common TO something — ser* común a algo
b) ( public)the common good — el bien común or de todos
II
1) u (in phrases)to have something in common (with somebody) — tener* algo en común (con alguien)
in common with — (as prep) al igual que; see also Commons
-
34 general
'‹enərəl
1. adjective1) (of, involving etc all, most or very many people, things etc: The general feeling is that he is stupid; His general knowledge is good although he is not good at mathematics.) general2) (covering a large number of cases: a general rule.) general3) (without details: I'll just give you a general idea of the plan.) general4) ((as part of an official title) chief: the Postmaster General.) jefe, general
2. noun(in the British army, (a person of) the rank next below field marshal: General Smith.) general- generalise
- generalization
- generalisation
- generally
- General Certificate of Education
- general election
- general practitioner
- general store
- as a general rule
- in general
- the general public
general1 adj generalin general en general / por lo generalgeneral2 n general
Multiple Entries: Gral. general
Gral. sustantivo masculino (◊ General) Gen.
general adjetivo hablando en líneas generales broadly speaking; un panorama general de la situación an overall view of the situationb) ( en locs)el público en general the general public; por lo general as a (general) rule ■ sustantivo masculino y femenino (Mil) general
general
I adjetivo general
director general, general manager, director-general
huelga general, general strike
secretario general, Secretary-General
II m Mil Rel general Locuciones: por lo o en general, in general, generally ' general' also found in these entries: Spanish: abogada - abogado - anestesia - asesinar - bachillerato - bien - camino - capitán - capitana - cerrarse - CGPJ - ciudad - comida - cuartel - decretar - desbandada - DGT - economía - EGB - el - elección - enferma - enfermo - ensayo - entre - error - esperar - fiscal - golpista - gral. - huelga - ladrón - ladrona - lata - lista - LOGSE - mayoría - nombrar - panorama - parecerse - piso - policlínica - política - protesta - pública - público - regalar - regla - sazón - secretaría English: AGM - all-out - as - Attorney General - backdrop - blanket - booze - bosom - breast - buck - crime - current - disheveled - dishevelled - dress - dress rehearsal - dry run - education - election - GATT - GCE - GCSE - general - general anaesthetic - general assembly - general election - general knowledge - general practice - general practitioner - general public - generally - GP - GPO - headquarters - HQ - large - main - managing - master - mobilize - most - opposite - outline - overall - overview - Postmaster General - practitioner - prevailing - public - quashtr['ʤenərəl]1 general■ could you give me a general idea? ¿me podrías dar una idea general?1 SMALLMILITARY/SMALL general nombre masculino\SMALLIDIOMATIC EXPRESSION/SMALLas a general rule por regla general, como normain general por lo generalgeneral knowledge conocimientos nombre masculino plural generalesgeneral practice medicina generalgeneral practitioner médico,-a de cabecerageneral ['ʤɛnrəl, 'ʤnə-] adj: generalin general: en general, por lo generalgeneral n: general mfadj.• extendido, -a adj.• general adj.n.• general s.m.
I 'dʒenrəl1)a) ( not detailed or specific) generalspeaking in general terms, you are right — hablando en general or en líneas generales, tienes razón
a general term — un término genérico or general
b) ( not specialized) < information> general; < laborer> no especializado2)a) ( applicable to all) generalthe general good — el bien general or de todos
b) ( widespread) < tendency> generalizado3) ( usual) generalas a general rule we don't allow it — por lo general or por regla general no lo permitimos
General Assembly — Asamblea f General
5) ( Med) < anesthetic> general
II
['dʒenǝrǝl]1. ADJ1) (=overall) [appearance, decline, attitude] general•
the general standard of education is very high — el nivel general de educación es muy alto2) (=widespread) [view, interest] general•
there was general agreement on this question — hubo un consenso general con respecto a esta cuestión•
there was general opposition to the proposal — la oposición a la propuesta fue general or generalizada3) (=vague, non-specific) generalbeware of making statements which are too general — ten cuidado de hacer afirmaciones que sean demasiado generales
•
we drove in the general direction of Aberdeen — fuimos conduciendo en dirección aproximada a Aberdeen•
please direct any general enquiries you may have to my secretary — le ruego solicite a mi secretaria cualquier información de carácter general4) (=usual)5) (=not specialized) [reader, public] no especializado•
an introduction to psychology for the general reader — una introducción a la psicología para el lector no especializado6) (at end of title) generalsecretary general — secretario(-a) m / f general
2. N1)• in general — en general
in general this kind of situation can be controlled — (=normally) en general or por lo general este tipo de situaciones pueden controlarse
2)3) (Mil) (=officer) general mfgood morning, General Croft — buenos días, General Croft
3.CPDgeneral anaesthesia N — anestesia f general
general anaesthetic, general anesthetic (US) N — anestesia f general
general assembly N — asamblea f general
general audit N — auditoría f general
general cargo N — cargamento m mixto
General Certificate of Secondary Education N (Brit) (Educ) — see cultural note GCSE
the General Confession N — (Church of England) la oración de confesión colectiva
general costs NPL — gastos mpl generales
general dealer N — (US) tienda f, almacén m (S. Cone)
general delivery N — (US, Canada) lista f de correos
general election N — elecciones fpl or comicios mpl generales
general expenses NPL — gastos mpl generales
general headquarters N — (Mil) cuartel msing general
general holiday N — día m festivo
general hospital N — hospital m
general knowledge N — cultura f general
general manager N — director(a) m / f general
general medicine N — medicina f general
general meeting N — asamblea f general
General Officer Commanding N — (Mil) Comandante mf en Jefe
general partnership N — (Jur) sociedad f regular colectiva
General Post Office N — (Brit) (Govt) (formerly) Correos m ; (=main post office) oficina f de correos
general practice N — (Brit) (Med) (=work) medicina f general; (=group) consultorio m médico
I am currently working in general practice — actualmente estoy trabajando como médico de medicina general
general practitioner N — médico(-a) m / f de medicina general frm, médico(-a) m / f de cabecera
the general public N — el público en general, el gran público
general science N — (Scol) Ciencias fpl
general science teacher N — profesor(a) m / f de Ciencias
General Secretary N — Secretario(a) m / f General
general staff N — estado m mayor (general)
general store N — (US) tienda f, almacén m (S. Cone)
general strike N — huelga f general
General Studies NPL — (Brit) estudios m generales
* * *
I ['dʒenrəl]1)a) ( not detailed or specific) generalspeaking in general terms, you are right — hablando en general or en líneas generales, tienes razón
a general term — un término genérico or general
b) ( not specialized) < information> general; < laborer> no especializado2)a) ( applicable to all) generalthe general good — el bien general or de todos
b) ( widespread) < tendency> generalizado3) ( usual) generalas a general rule we don't allow it — por lo general or por regla general no lo permitimos
General Assembly — Asamblea f General
5) ( Med) < anesthetic> general
II
-
35 common
1. adjective,1) (belonging equally to all) gemeinsam [Ziel, Interesse, Sache, Unternehmung, Vorteil, Merkmal, Sprache]2) (belonging to the public) öffentlicha common belief — [ein] allgemeiner Glaube
3) (usual) gewöhnlich; normal; (frequent) häufig [Vorgang, Erscheinung, Ereignis, Erlebnis]; allgemein verbreitet [Sitte, Wort, Redensart]common honesty/courtesy — [ganz] normale Ehrlichkeit/Höflichkeit
4) (without rank or position) einfach5) (vulgar) gemein; gewöhnlich (abwertend), ordinär (ugs. abwertend) [Ausdrucksweise, Mundart, Aussehen, Benehmen]2. noun2)have something/nothing/a lot in common [with somebody] — etwas/nichts/viel [mit jemandem] gemein[sam] haben
* * *['komən] 1. adjective1) (seen or happening often; quite normal or usual: a common occurrence; These birds are not so common nowadays.) gewöhnlich2) (belonging equally to, or shared by, more than one: This knowledge is common to all of us; We share a common language.) gemeinsam3) (publicly owned: common property.) allgemein4) (coarse or impolite: She uses some very common expressions.) gewöhnlich, gemein5) (of ordinary, not high, social rank: the common people.) einfach6) (of a noun, not beginning with a capital letter (except at the beginning of a sentence): The house is empty.) Gattungs-...2. noun((a piece of) public land for everyone to use, with few or no buildings: the village common.) das Gemeindeland- academic.ru/14625/commoner">commoner- common knowledge
- common law
- common-law
- commonplace
- common-room
- common sense
- the Common Market
- the House of Commons
- the Commons
- in common* * *com·mon[ˈkɒmən, AM ˈkɑ:-]I. adj<-er, -est or more \common, most \common>1. (often encountered) üblich, gewöhnlicha \common name ein gängiger [o weit verbreiteter] Namea \common saying ein verbreiteter Spruch2. (normal) normalit is \common practice... es ist allgemein üblich...\common courtesy/decency ein Gebot nt der Höflichkeit/des Anstandsit's \common courtesy... es gehört sich einfach...\common salt Kochsalz nt3. (widespread) weit verbreitetit is \common knowledge that... es ist allgemein bekannt, dass...a \common ailment ein weit verbreitetes Übela \common disease eine weit verbreitete Krankheit\common area allgemeiner Bereichby \common assent/consent mit allgemeiner Zustimmung/Einwilligung\common bathroom Gemeinschaftsbad ntto make \common cause with sb mit jdm gemeinsame Sache machenfor the \common good für das Gemeinwohlto be on \common ground with sb jds Ansichten teilen\common interests gemeinsame Interessentenancy in \common Bruchteilsgemeinschaft fin \common gemeinsamto have sth in \common [with sb] etw [mit jdm] gemein habenwe've got a lot of interests in \common wir haben viele gemeinsame Interessen5. ZOOL, BOT sparrow, primrose gemein6.<-er, -est>a \common slut eine ordinäre Schlampe pej fam7. (ordinary) einfacha \common criminal ein gewöhnlicher Verbrecher/eine gewöhnliche Verbrecherin peja \common thief ein gemeiner Dieb/eine gemeine Diebina \common labourer ein einfacher Arbeiter/eine einfache Arbeiterinthe \common man der Normalbürger [o Durchschnittsbürger]\common people einfache Leutea \common soldier ein einfacher Soldat* * *['kɒmən]1. adj (+er)1) (= shared by many) gemeinsam; property also Gemein-, gemeinschaftlichcommon land — Allmende f
it is common knowledge that... —
it is to the common advantage that... — es ist von allgemeinem Nutzen, dass...
very little/no common ground — kaum eine/keine gemeinsame Basis
to find common ground (with sb) — eine gemeinsame Basis finden (mit jdm)
sth is common to everyone/sth — alle haben/etw hat etw gemein
2) (= frequently seen or heard etc) häufig; word also weitverbreitet, weit verbreitet, geläufig; experience also allgemein; animal, bird häufig pred, häufig anzutreffend attr; belief, custom, animal, bird (weit)verbreitet, weit verbreitet; (= customary, usual) normalit's quite a common sight — das sieht man ziemlich häufig
it's common for visitors to feel ill here —
nowadays it's quite common for the man to do the housework — es ist heutzutage ganz normal, dass der Mann die Hausarbeit macht
3) (= ordinary) gewöhnlichthe common people —
a common soldier — ein einfacher or gemeiner (dated) Soldat
he has the common touch —
it's only common decency to apologize — es ist nur recht und billig, dass man sich entschuldigt
4) (= vulgar, low-class) gewöhnlich2. n1) (= land) Anger m, Gemeindewiese f2)3)to have sth in common (with sb/sth) — etw (mit jdm/etw) gemein haben
to have a lot/nothing in common — viel/nichts miteinander gemein haben, viele/keine Gemeinsamkeiten haben
in common with many other people/towns/countries — (ebenso or genauso) wie viele andere (Leute)/Städte/Länder...
I, in common with... — ich, ebenso wie...
* * *1. gemeinsam, gemeinschaftlich:common to all allen gemeinsam;that was common ground in yesterday’s debate darüber waren sich in der gestrigen Debatte alle einig;be common ground between the parties JUR von keiner der Parteien bestritten werden;they have sufficient common ground sie haben genügend Gemeinsamkeiten;2. a) allgemeinb) öffentlich:by common consent mit allgemeiner Zustimmung;3. Gemeinde…, Stadt…4. notorisch, berüchtigt (Verbrecher etc)5. a) allgemein (bekannt), alltäglich, gewöhnlich, normal, vertrautb) häufig:be common häufig vorkommen;it is a common belief es wird allgemein geglaubt;it is common knowledge (usage) es ist allgemein bekannt (üblich);a very common name ein sehr häufiger Name;common sight alltäglicher oder vertrauter Anblick;6. üblich, allgemein gebräuchlich:common salt gewöhnliches Salz, Kochsalz n8. allgemein zugänglich, öffentlich9. gewöhnlich, minderwertig, zweitklassig10. abgedroschen (Phrase etc)11. gewöhnlich, ordinär (Br besonders Person)12. gewöhnlich, ohne Rang:the common man der einfache Mann von der Straße;the common people das einfache Volk;B s3. Gemeinsamkeit f:(act) in common gemeinsam (vorgehen);in common with (genau) wie;with so much in common bei so vielen Gemeinsamkeiten;have sth in common with etwas gemein haben mit;we have nothing in common wir haben nichts miteinander gemein;they have many interests in common sie haben viele gemeinsame Interessen;hold sth in common etwas gemeinsam besitzenout of the common außergewöhnlich, -ordentlichcom. abk1. comedy2. comma3. commander4. commerce5. commercial6. commission7. commissioner8. committee9. common* * *1. adjective,1) (belonging equally to all) gemeinsam [Ziel, Interesse, Sache, Unternehmung, Vorteil, Merkmal, Sprache]2) (belonging to the public) öffentlicha common belief — [ein] allgemeiner Glaube
3) (usual) gewöhnlich; normal; (frequent) häufig [Vorgang, Erscheinung, Ereignis, Erlebnis]; allgemein verbreitet [Sitte, Wort, Redensart]common honesty/courtesy — [ganz] normale Ehrlichkeit/Höflichkeit
4) (without rank or position) einfach5) (vulgar) gemein; gewöhnlich (abwertend), ordinär (ugs. abwertend) [Ausdrucksweise, Mundart, Aussehen, Benehmen]2. noun2)have something/nothing/a lot in common [with somebody] — etwas/nichts/viel [mit jemandem] gemein[sam] haben
* * *adj.allgemein adj.allgemein bekannt adj.geläufig adj.gemeinsam adj.zusammen adj. n.verbreitet adj. -
36 general
̈ɪˈdʒenərəl I прил.
1) общий, родовой( о понятии), общего характера (характерный для определенного класса, типа) bearing a general resemblance to the original ≈ имеющий общее (в общих чертах) сходство с оригиналом general workers ≈ неквалифицированные рабочие, разнорабочие general hospital ≈ неспециализированная больница, больница общего типа in general ≈ вообще Syn: accepted, common, generic, popular, public, universal
2) а) повсеместный;
широкий general opinion ≈ общее мнение general holiday ≈ общенародный праздник б) превалирующий;
наиболее широко распространенный Syn: prevalent
3) обычный, общепринятый Syn: customary, habitual, common, popular, public Ant: queer, specific, uncommon, unparalleled, unusual
4) главный, основной, генеральный general layout ≈ генеральный план( застройки, строительства) General Headquarters ≈ штаб главнокомандующего, ставка;
главное командование Syn: chief, main II сущ.
1) обобщающее понятие
2) генерал;
военачальник, командующий, полководец general of the Army ≈ командующий армией brigadier general ≈ бригадный генерал commanding general ≈ командующий/командир в звании генерала lieutenant general ≈ генерал-лейтенант major general ≈ генерал-майор three-star general ≈ генерал-лейтенант Syn: commander, military leader генерал - * of the Army (американизм) генерал армии (американизм) (сленг) начальство, "отец-командир" (о заведующем, директоре школы, главе семьи и т. п.) (the *) общее - the * and the particular общее и частное общие замечания;
общие положение;
общая часть( публикации) (разговорное) прислуга "за все" (церковное) глава ордена (устаревшее) большинство( устаревшее) (the *) народ( устаревшее) толпа, чернь, простонародье > *'s battle бой, исход которого решает умелое командование общий, всеобщий - * meeting общее собрание - * strike всеобщая забастовка - there was a * panic всех охватила паника - there was a * exodus все сдвинулись с места (разъезд, эмиграция и т. п.) - * education всеобщее образование /обучение/ - * knowledge то, что известно всем - * average общая авария - * library общая библиотека;
университетская библиотека - * debate общие прения /дебаты, -ая дискуссия/ - * ticket( американизм) общий список (избирательный бюллетень с кандидатами, представляющими штат или город в целом, а не их отдельные районы) - * pardon всеобщая амнистия - * favourite общий любимец;
тот, кого все считают наиболее вероятной кандидатурой ( на выборах, соревнованиях и т. п.) широкий;
повсеместный - * opinion общее мнение - * holiday общенародный праздник - * lay-out общее расположение, генеральный план - * counter-attack( военное) общая контратака;
контрнаступление - * support( военное) общая поддержка - * paralysis (медицина) прогрессивный паралич - * anesthesia( медицина) общий наркоз - * release (кинематографический) широкий /неограниченный/ прокат, выпуск на широкий экран - to work for the * welfare работать на общее благо - the book was a * favourite книга понравилась всем /пользовалась успехом у всех/ - it is a matter of * anxiety это беспокоит всех, это предмет всеобщего беспокойства - it is not in the * interest to close railways закрыть железнодорожное движение противоречит общим интересам - there has been * opposition to the scheme план вызвал протест широких масс, все были против этого плана - the rain has been fairly * можно сказать, что дождь шел повсюду распространенный;
общепринятый, обычный - * word обычное /общепринятое/ слово - * notion общепринятое понятие /представление/ - in * обычно, вообще, в большинстве случаев - in * people like her обычно она людям нравится - as a * rule обычно, как правило - the * idea is that... все считают, что..., существует общее мнение, что... - this word is in * use это очень употребительное слово - this type of behaviour is fairly * among young people такая модель поведения довольно характерна для молодежи общий, общего характера, неспециализированный, неспециальный - * public широкие массы - * reader широкий /рядовой, массовый/ читатель - the book was not accessible to the * reader для широкого читателя эта книга была недоступна - * dealer торговец товарами повседневного спроса;
хозяин лавки, в которой продаются различные товары - * store(s) универсальный магазин, неспециализированный магазин - * servant прислуга "за все" - * education общее образование - * knowledge знания в различных областях - * hospital неспециализированная больница;
больница общего типа - * practitioner врач широкого профиля - who is your * practitioner? кто ваш лечащий врач? - to be in * practice заниматься общей врачебной практикой - * pathology общая патология - * farming неспециализированное хозяйство - * overhaul капитальный ремонт - * reconnaissance общая разведка - * reserve( военное) общий резерв;
резерв общего назначения - * duties( военное) строевая служба - * engineering общее машиностроение - * cargo( морское) генеральный груз;
сборный груз - for * use для общего пользования расплывчатый, неточный, общий - * impression общее впечатление - * recommendations общие рекомендации - to have a * idea иметь общее представление - I've got the * idea в общих чертах я понял - to give a * outline наметить в общих чертах - to explain in * terms объяснить в общих чертах - the statement is too * это заявление носит слишком общий характер - if you go in the * direction of the church... видите церковь? Если вы будете держаться этого направления... - I see only a * resemblance я вижу только самое общее сходство - I can give only a * description я могу дать только самое общее описание главный, генеральный - * committee генеральный комитет (ООН) ;
президиум - Director G., G. Manager генеральный директор - * officer генерал - G. Commanding Officer командующий, командующий группой войск, командир соединения - * headquarters ставка, главное командование - * staff( американизм) общая часть штаба;
общий штаб - * court martial военный суд высшей инстанции ~ обычный;
as a general rule как правило;
in a general way обычным путем auditor ~ генеральный ревизор consul ~ генеральный консул director ~ генеральный директор general всеобщий ~ генерал;
полководец ~ генеральный ~ главный;
general layout генеральный план (строительства) ~ главный ~ неспециализированный ~ неспециальный ~ общий, общего характера, всеобщий;
генеральный;
general meeting общее собрание;
general impression общее впечатление ~ общий ~ обычный;
as a general rule как правило;
in a general way обычным путем ~ обычный ~ повсеместный General Headquarters штаб главнокомандующего, ставка;
главное командование;
general staff общевойсковой штаб ~ strike всеобщая забастовка;
general hospital неспециализированная больница, больница общего типа;
in general вообще hospital: general ~ общий госпиталь ~ общий, общего характера, всеобщий;
генеральный;
general meeting общее собрание;
general impression общее впечатление ~ главный;
general layout генеральный план (строительства) ~ общий, общего характера, всеобщий;
генеральный;
general meeting общее собрание;
general impression общее впечатление meeting: general ~ деловая встреча general ~ общее собрание ~ public широкая публика, общественность;
general workers неквалифицированные рабочие, разнорабочие public: general ~ общественность general ~ широкая публика General Headquarters штаб главнокомандующего, ставка;
главное командование;
general staff общевойсковой штаб General Staff генеральный штаб( сухопутных войск) ;
general (post) delivery первая утренняя разноска почты;
амер. (почта) до востребования staff: general ~ основной персонал ~ strike всеобщая забастовка;
general hospital неспециализированная больница, больница общего типа;
in general вообще strike: general ~ всеобщая забастовка general ~ всеобщая стачка ~ public широкая публика, общественность;
general workers неквалифицированные рабочие, разнорабочие ~ обычный;
as a general rule как правило;
in a general way обычным путем ~ strike всеобщая забастовка;
general hospital неспециализированная больница, больница общего типа;
in general вообще secretary ~ генеральный секретарь secretary: ~ секретарь, руководитель организации;
secretary general генеральный секретарь -
37 Artificial Intelligence
In my opinion, none of [these programs] does even remote justice to the complexity of human mental processes. Unlike men, "artificially intelligent" programs tend to be single minded, undistractable, and unemotional. (Neisser, 1967, p. 9)Future progress in [artificial intelligence] will depend on the development of both practical and theoretical knowledge.... As regards theoretical knowledge, some have sought a unified theory of artificial intelligence. My view is that artificial intelligence is (or soon will be) an engineering discipline since its primary goal is to build things. (Nilsson, 1971, pp. vii-viii)Most workers in AI [artificial intelligence] research and in related fields confess to a pronounced feeling of disappointment in what has been achieved in the last 25 years. Workers entered the field around 1950, and even around 1960, with high hopes that are very far from being realized in 1972. In no part of the field have the discoveries made so far produced the major impact that was then promised.... In the meantime, claims and predictions regarding the potential results of AI research had been publicized which went even farther than the expectations of the majority of workers in the field, whose embarrassments have been added to by the lamentable failure of such inflated predictions....When able and respected scientists write in letters to the present author that AI, the major goal of computing science, represents "another step in the general process of evolution"; that possibilities in the 1980s include an all-purpose intelligence on a human-scale knowledge base; that awe-inspiring possibilities suggest themselves based on machine intelligence exceeding human intelligence by the year 2000 [one has the right to be skeptical]. (Lighthill, 1972, p. 17)4) Just as Astronomy Succeeded Astrology, the Discovery of Intellectual Processes in Machines Should Lead to a Science, EventuallyJust as astronomy succeeded astrology, following Kepler's discovery of planetary regularities, the discoveries of these many principles in empirical explorations on intellectual processes in machines should lead to a science, eventually. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 11)5) Problems in Machine Intelligence Arise Because Things Obvious to Any Person Are Not Represented in the ProgramMany problems arise in experiments on machine intelligence because things obvious to any person are not represented in any program. One can pull with a string, but one cannot push with one.... Simple facts like these caused serious problems when Charniak attempted to extend Bobrow's "Student" program to more realistic applications, and they have not been faced up to until now. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 77)What do we mean by [a symbolic] "description"? We do not mean to suggest that our descriptions must be made of strings of ordinary language words (although they might be). The simplest kind of description is a structure in which some features of a situation are represented by single ("primitive") symbols, and relations between those features are represented by other symbols-or by other features of the way the description is put together. (Minsky & Papert, 1973, p. 11)[AI is] the use of computer programs and programming techniques to cast light on the principles of intelligence in general and human thought in particular. (Boden, 1977, p. 5)The word you look for and hardly ever see in the early AI literature is the word knowledge. They didn't believe you have to know anything, you could always rework it all.... In fact 1967 is the turning point in my mind when there was enough feeling that the old ideas of general principles had to go.... I came up with an argument for what I called the primacy of expertise, and at the time I called the other guys the generalists. (Moses, quoted in McCorduck, 1979, pp. 228-229)9) Artificial Intelligence Is Psychology in a Particularly Pure and Abstract FormThe basic idea of cognitive science is that intelligent beings are semantic engines-in other words, automatic formal systems with interpretations under which they consistently make sense. We can now see why this includes psychology and artificial intelligence on a more or less equal footing: people and intelligent computers (if and when there are any) turn out to be merely different manifestations of the same underlying phenomenon. Moreover, with universal hardware, any semantic engine can in principle be formally imitated by a computer if only the right program can be found. And that will guarantee semantic imitation as well, since (given the appropriate formal behavior) the semantics is "taking care of itself" anyway. Thus we also see why, from this perspective, artificial intelligence can be regarded as psychology in a particularly pure and abstract form. The same fundamental structures are under investigation, but in AI, all the relevant parameters are under direct experimental control (in the programming), without any messy physiology or ethics to get in the way. (Haugeland, 1981b, p. 31)There are many different kinds of reasoning one might imagine:Formal reasoning involves the syntactic manipulation of data structures to deduce new ones following prespecified rules of inference. Mathematical logic is the archetypical formal representation. Procedural reasoning uses simulation to answer questions and solve problems. When we use a program to answer What is the sum of 3 and 4? it uses, or "runs," a procedural model of arithmetic. Reasoning by analogy seems to be a very natural mode of thought for humans but, so far, difficult to accomplish in AI programs. The idea is that when you ask the question Can robins fly? the system might reason that "robins are like sparrows, and I know that sparrows can fly, so robins probably can fly."Generalization and abstraction are also natural reasoning process for humans that are difficult to pin down well enough to implement in a program. If one knows that Robins have wings, that Sparrows have wings, and that Blue jays have wings, eventually one will believe that All birds have wings. This capability may be at the core of most human learning, but it has not yet become a useful technique in AI.... Meta- level reasoning is demonstrated by the way one answers the question What is Paul Newman's telephone number? You might reason that "if I knew Paul Newman's number, I would know that I knew it, because it is a notable fact." This involves using "knowledge about what you know," in particular, about the extent of your knowledge and about the importance of certain facts. Recent research in psychology and AI indicates that meta-level reasoning may play a central role in human cognitive processing. (Barr & Feigenbaum, 1981, pp. 146-147)Suffice it to say that programs already exist that can do things-or, at the very least, appear to be beginning to do things-which ill-informed critics have asserted a priori to be impossible. Examples include: perceiving in a holistic as opposed to an atomistic way; using language creatively; translating sensibly from one language to another by way of a language-neutral semantic representation; planning acts in a broad and sketchy fashion, the details being decided only in execution; distinguishing between different species of emotional reaction according to the psychological context of the subject. (Boden, 1981, p. 33)Can the synthesis of Man and Machine ever be stable, or will the purely organic component become such a hindrance that it has to be discarded? If this eventually happens-and I have... good reasons for thinking that it must-we have nothing to regret and certainly nothing to fear. (Clarke, 1984, p. 243)The thesis of GOFAI... is not that the processes underlying intelligence can be described symbolically... but that they are symbolic. (Haugeland, 1985, p. 113)14) Artificial Intelligence Provides a Useful Approach to Psychological and Psychiatric Theory FormationIt is all very well formulating psychological and psychiatric theories verbally but, when using natural language (even technical jargon), it is difficult to recognise when a theory is complete; oversights are all too easily made, gaps too readily left. This is a point which is generally recognised to be true and it is for precisely this reason that the behavioural sciences attempt to follow the natural sciences in using "classical" mathematics as a more rigorous descriptive language. However, it is an unfortunate fact that, with a few notable exceptions, there has been a marked lack of success in this application. It is my belief that a different approach-a different mathematics-is needed, and that AI provides just this approach. (Hand, quoted in Hand, 1985, pp. 6-7)We might distinguish among four kinds of AI.Research of this kind involves building and programming computers to perform tasks which, to paraphrase Marvin Minsky, would require intelligence if they were done by us. Researchers in nonpsychological AI make no claims whatsoever about the psychological realism of their programs or the devices they build, that is, about whether or not computers perform tasks as humans do.Research here is guided by the view that the computer is a useful tool in the study of mind. In particular, we can write computer programs or build devices that simulate alleged psychological processes in humans and then test our predictions about how the alleged processes work. We can weave these programs and devices together with other programs and devices that simulate different alleged mental processes and thereby test the degree to which the AI system as a whole simulates human mentality. According to weak psychological AI, working with computer models is a way of refining and testing hypotheses about processes that are allegedly realized in human minds.... According to this view, our minds are computers and therefore can be duplicated by other computers. Sherry Turkle writes that the "real ambition is of mythic proportions, making a general purpose intelligence, a mind." (Turkle, 1984, p. 240) The authors of a major text announce that "the ultimate goal of AI research is to build a person or, more humbly, an animal." (Charniak & McDermott, 1985, p. 7)Research in this field, like strong psychological AI, takes seriously the functionalist view that mentality can be realized in many different types of physical devices. Suprapsychological AI, however, accuses strong psychological AI of being chauvinisticof being only interested in human intelligence! Suprapsychological AI claims to be interested in all the conceivable ways intelligence can be realized. (Flanagan, 1991, pp. 241-242)16) Determination of Relevance of Rules in Particular ContextsEven if the [rules] were stored in a context-free form the computer still couldn't use them. To do that the computer requires rules enabling it to draw on just those [ rules] which are relevant in each particular context. Determination of relevance will have to be based on further facts and rules, but the question will again arise as to which facts and rules are relevant for making each particular determination. One could always invoke further facts and rules to answer this question, but of course these must be only the relevant ones. And so it goes. It seems that AI workers will never be able to get started here unless they can settle the problem of relevance beforehand by cataloguing types of context and listing just those facts which are relevant in each. (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1986, p. 80)Perhaps the single most important idea to artificial intelligence is that there is no fundamental difference between form and content, that meaning can be captured in a set of symbols such as a semantic net. (G. Johnson, 1986, p. 250)Artificial intelligence is based on the assumption that the mind can be described as some kind of formal system manipulating symbols that stand for things in the world. Thus it doesn't matter what the brain is made of, or what it uses for tokens in the great game of thinking. Using an equivalent set of tokens and rules, we can do thinking with a digital computer, just as we can play chess using cups, salt and pepper shakers, knives, forks, and spoons. Using the right software, one system (the mind) can be mapped into the other (the computer). (G. Johnson, 1986, p. 250)19) A Statement of the Primary and Secondary Purposes of Artificial IntelligenceThe primary goal of Artificial Intelligence is to make machines smarter.The secondary goals of Artificial Intelligence are to understand what intelligence is (the Nobel laureate purpose) and to make machines more useful (the entrepreneurial purpose). (Winston, 1987, p. 1)The theoretical ideas of older branches of engineering are captured in the language of mathematics. We contend that mathematical logic provides the basis for theory in AI. Although many computer scientists already count logic as fundamental to computer science in general, we put forward an even stronger form of the logic-is-important argument....AI deals mainly with the problem of representing and using declarative (as opposed to procedural) knowledge. Declarative knowledge is the kind that is expressed as sentences, and AI needs a language in which to state these sentences. Because the languages in which this knowledge usually is originally captured (natural languages such as English) are not suitable for computer representations, some other language with the appropriate properties must be used. It turns out, we think, that the appropriate properties include at least those that have been uppermost in the minds of logicians in their development of logical languages such as the predicate calculus. Thus, we think that any language for expressing knowledge in AI systems must be at least as expressive as the first-order predicate calculus. (Genesereth & Nilsson, 1987, p. viii)21) Perceptual Structures Can Be Represented as Lists of Elementary PropositionsIn artificial intelligence studies, perceptual structures are represented as assemblages of description lists, the elementary components of which are propositions asserting that certain relations hold among elements. (Chase & Simon, 1988, p. 490)Artificial intelligence (AI) is sometimes defined as the study of how to build and/or program computers to enable them to do the sorts of things that minds can do. Some of these things are commonly regarded as requiring intelligence: offering a medical diagnosis and/or prescription, giving legal or scientific advice, proving theorems in logic or mathematics. Others are not, because they can be done by all normal adults irrespective of educational background (and sometimes by non-human animals too), and typically involve no conscious control: seeing things in sunlight and shadows, finding a path through cluttered terrain, fitting pegs into holes, speaking one's own native tongue, and using one's common sense. Because it covers AI research dealing with both these classes of mental capacity, this definition is preferable to one describing AI as making computers do "things that would require intelligence if done by people." However, it presupposes that computers could do what minds can do, that they might really diagnose, advise, infer, and understand. One could avoid this problematic assumption (and also side-step questions about whether computers do things in the same way as we do) by defining AI instead as "the development of computers whose observable performance has features which in humans we would attribute to mental processes." This bland characterization would be acceptable to some AI workers, especially amongst those focusing on the production of technological tools for commercial purposes. But many others would favour a more controversial definition, seeing AI as the science of intelligence in general-or, more accurately, as the intellectual core of cognitive science. As such, its goal is to provide a systematic theory that can explain (and perhaps enable us to replicate) both the general categories of intentionality and the diverse psychological capacities grounded in them. (Boden, 1990b, pp. 1-2)Because the ability to store data somewhat corresponds to what we call memory in human beings, and because the ability to follow logical procedures somewhat corresponds to what we call reasoning in human beings, many members of the cult have concluded that what computers do somewhat corresponds to what we call thinking. It is no great difficulty to persuade the general public of that conclusion since computers process data very fast in small spaces well below the level of visibility; they do not look like other machines when they are at work. They seem to be running along as smoothly and silently as the brain does when it remembers and reasons and thinks. On the other hand, those who design and build computers know exactly how the machines are working down in the hidden depths of their semiconductors. Computers can be taken apart, scrutinized, and put back together. Their activities can be tracked, analyzed, measured, and thus clearly understood-which is far from possible with the brain. This gives rise to the tempting assumption on the part of the builders and designers that computers can tell us something about brains, indeed, that the computer can serve as a model of the mind, which then comes to be seen as some manner of information processing machine, and possibly not as good at the job as the machine. (Roszak, 1994, pp. xiv-xv)The inner workings of the human mind are far more intricate than the most complicated systems of modern technology. Researchers in the field of artificial intelligence have been attempting to develop programs that will enable computers to display intelligent behavior. Although this field has been an active one for more than thirty-five years and has had many notable successes, AI researchers still do not know how to create a program that matches human intelligence. No existing program can recall facts, solve problems, reason, learn, and process language with human facility. This lack of success has occurred not because computers are inferior to human brains but rather because we do not yet know in sufficient detail how intelligence is organized in the brain. (Anderson, 1995, p. 2)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Artificial Intelligence
-
38 Bibliography
■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reflections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
-
39 matter
ˈmætə
1. сущ.
1) а) вещество primed matter ≈ воспламеняющееся вещество gaseous matter ≈ газообразное вещество gray matter ≈ серое вещество мозга liquid matter ≈ жидкое вещество organic matter ≈ органическое вещество solid matter ≈ твердое вещество б) перен. материал, исходный материал reading matter ≈ литература, материал для чтения
2) филос. материя
3) сущность;
содержание to look from the manner to the matter of his speech ≈ обратить внимание не на стиль речи, а на ее содержание
4) а) тема, вопрос, предмет( обсуждения и т. п.) subject matter ≈ тема, предмет обсуждения Syn: topic б) разг. кое-что, кое-какие факты. I have a matter for your ear. ≈ Я должен Вам сообщить кое-что тет-а-тет.
5) вопрос, дело to arrange, clear up, settle, straighten out matters ≈ улаживать, устраивать дела to complicate matters ≈ усложнять ситуацию to give attention to the matter ≈ уделить внимание вопросу to give thought to the matter ≈ поразмыслить над вопросом to pursue, take up a matter ≈ обсуждать вопрос to simplify matters ≈ упрощать ситуацию to take matters into one's own hands ≈ брать дело в свои руки important, pressing, serious matter ≈ важный, серьезный вопрос petty, trifling matter ≈ незначительный, неважный вопрос matter of grave importance ≈ очень важный вопрос it is a matter of a few months ≈ это дело/вопрос нескольких месяцев not to mince matters ≈ говорить прямо, без обиняков the fact of the matter is that... ≈ дело в том, что... We have given this matter considerable thought. ≈ Мы очень много думали над этим вопросом. It's no easy matter to find a house in this city. ≈ В этом городе нелегко найти жилье. Being accused of assault is no laughing matter. ≈ Это не шутка - быть обвиненным в оскорблении.
6) причина, основание, повод (для чего-л., к чему-л. ≈ of, for) Syn: ground, reason
7) мед. гной Syn: pus
8) полигр. рукопись;
оригинал ∙ in the matter of... ≈ что касается... for that matter, for the matter of that ≈ что касается этого;
в этом отношении;
коли на то пошло no matter ≈ безразлично;
все равно, неважно no matter what ≈ несмотря ни на что;
что бы ни было
2. гл.
1) иметь значение;
значить It does not matter at all. ≈ Это не имеет никакого значения. Syn: signify
2) гноиться a mattering wound ≈ гноящаяся рана, гнойник Syn: suppurate вещество;
материал - radioactive * радиоактивное вещество - colouring * красящее вещество, краситель - grey * серое вещество головного мозга;
(разговорное) ум - * in suspension вещество, находящееся во взвешенном состоянии гной (философское) материя - the indestructibility of * неуничтожимость материи - victory of mind over * победа духа над плотью материал (содержащийся в книге, статье и т. п.) - there is not much reading * in this illustrated weekly в этом иллюстрированном еженедельнике не так много материала для чтения - the book contains much useless * в книге много бесполезного материала /бесполезных вещей/ содержание (книги и т. п.) - form and * форма и содержание - the * in your article is interesting but the style is deplorable содержание вашей статьи интересно, но форма изложения никуда не годится сущность, предмет (обсуждения, дискуссии, судебного разбирательства) - * of dispute предмет спора - to provide * for discussion дать тему для обсуждения /разговоров/;
явиться темой обсуждения /разговоров/ - the * in hand вопрос, который обсуждается дело, вопрос - business *s дела, деловый вопросы - a private * личное дело, личный вопрос - money *s денежные дела - small * пустяки - (it is) no laughing * (это) не шуточное дело - that is (quite) another *, that's another * (altogether), that'a a (very) different * это (совсем) другое дело - an easy * простое дело - it is no easy * это дело не простое, это не просто - a * of common knowledge общеизвестная вещь, общеизвестный факт - a * of conscience дело совести - a * of form вопрос формы;
формальность - a * of great importance очень важное дело, очень важный вопрос - a * of law вопрос права;
тяжба, процесс - a * of life and death вопрос жизни и смерти;
жизненно важный вопрос - a * of opinion спорный вопрос - a * of taste дело вкуса - in *s of religion в вопросах религии - in all *s of education во всем, что касается образования - it is simply a * of time это просто вопрос времени - that was a * of 40 years ago это дела сорокалетней давности - we'll deal with this * tomorrow этим делом мы займемся завтра;
мы рассмотрим этот вопрос завтра - as *s stand при существующем положении (дел), в создавшейся обстановке - let's see how *s stand посмотрим, как обстоят дела - that will only make *s worse это только ухудшит /усугубит/ положение (the *) неприятное дело, неприятность;
трудность - what's the *? в чем дело?, что случилось? - what is the * with him? что с ним? - is there anything the * with him? с ним что-нибудь случилось? - I don't know what is the * with me я не знаю, что со мной - what's the * with your hand? что у тебя с рукой? - nothing's the * ничего не случилось /не произошло/ - as if nothing was the * как будто ничего не случилось - there's nothing the * with me, nothing's the * with me у меня все в порядке (of, for) повод, причина, основание - a * of congratulation повод для поздравления - it is a * for regret об этом приходится сожалеть;
это достойно сожаления - there is no * for complaint нет повода жаловаться - it's a * of great concern to us это нас очень волнует, это причина глубокого беспокойства для всех нас( собирательнле) (специальное) почтовые отправления - first-class * (американизм) запечатанные письма - second-class * (американизм) периодические издания, посылаемые почтой - third-class * (американизм) печатные издания, посылаемые почтой (юридическое) заявление, утверждение. требующее доказательств - a * in deed факт, подтвержденный документально спорный вопрос, спорный пункт;
предмет спора (полиграфия) рукопись, оригинал (полиграфия) набор;
напечатанный, набранный материал > (it is, it makes) no * (это) не имеет значения > it made no * to him that his brother lost all his money ему было безразлично, что его брат потерял все деньги > no *! ничего!, неважно!, все равно! > (it is) no such * ничего подобного, ничуть не бывало > what *? какое это имеет значение? > in the * of studies что касается занятий > a * of что-нибудь вроде, около > a * of ten miles расстояние примерно в десять миль > a * of a few days дело нескольких дней > a * of five pounds вопрос пяти фунтов или около того > for that *, for the * of that в сущности, фактически, собственно говоря, по правде говоря, коли на то пошло;
что касается этого, в этом отношении > no * what несмотря ни на что;
что бы то ни было > no * how как бы ни было > to carry *s too far зайти слишком далеко > to take *s easy не волноваться, не обращать внимания > to make *s worse he was late более того /в довершение всего/, он еще и опоздал > not to mince *s говорить напрямик /без обиняков/ > what is the * with this? чем это не подходит?;
какие это вызывает возражения? > what's the * with trying to help him? что (здесь) особенного /такого, плохого/, если я попробую помочь ему? (чаще в отриц. и вопр. предложениях) иметь значение - not to * не иметь значения - not to * a bit /a hoot, a rap, a straw/ не иметь ни малейшего /ровно никакого/ значения - it doesn't * if I miss my train, there's another one later неважно /не имеет значения/, если я опоздаю на этот поезд, позже есть еще один - it *s a good deal to me для меня это очень важно - it *s little это не имеет большого значения - nothing else *s все остальное не имеет значения - it doesn't * это не имеет значения, это несущественно;
ничего, неважно - what does it *? какое это имеет значение? - what does it * what I say? разве мои слова имеют хоть какое-нибудь значение? - I shouldn't let what he says * я не обращал бы внимания на то, что он говорит гноиться - the cut got dirty and began to * в ранку попала грязь, и она загноилась adjudicatory ~ судебное дело as a ~ of fact в сущности;
собственно говоря as a ~ of fact фактически, на самом деле a ~ of taste (habit, etc.) дело вкуса (привычки и т. п.) ;
money matters денежные дела;
as matters stand при существующем положении (дел) commercial ~ относящийся к коммерции disciplinary ~ дисциплинарный вопрос evidential ~ вещественное доказательство evidential ~ доказательственный материал financial ~ финансовая сторона дела financial ~ финансовый вопрос for that ~, for the ~ of that что касается этого;
в этом отношении;
коли на то пошло for that ~, for the ~ of that что касается этого;
в этом отношении;
коли на то пошло ~ сущность;
содержание;
form and matter форма и содержание front ~ обложка и титульные листы grey ~ серое вещество мозга grey ~ разг. ум ~ полигр. рукопись;
оригинал;
in the matter of... что касается... incidental ~ несущественный вопрос internal ~ внутренний вопрос ~ иметь значение;
it doesn't matter это не имеет значения;
неважно, ничего a ~ of life and death вопрос жизни и смерти, жизненно важный вопрос;
it is a matter of a few hours( days, weeks, etc.) это дело нескольких часов( дней, недель и т. п.) ~ вопрос, дело;
it is a matter of common knowledge это общеизвестно;
a matter of dispute предмет спора, спорный вопрос judicial ~ предмет судебного разбирательства law ~ правовой вопрос legal ~ правовой вопрос market ~ рыночная сторона дела matter вещество ~ вопрос, дело;
it is a matter of common knowledge это общеизвестно;
a matter of dispute предмет спора, спорный вопрос ~ вопрос ~ гноиться ~ мед. гной ~ дело ~ заявление, требующее доказательства ~ иметь значение;
it doesn't matter это не имеет значения;
неважно, ничего ~ иметь значение ~ материал ~ материал ~ филос. материя ~ набранный материал ~ напечатанный материал ~ оригинал ~ основание ~ повод (of, for) ~ повод ~ почтовые отправления ~ предмет (обсуждения и т. п.) ~ предмет обсуждения ~ предмет спора ~ причина ~ полигр. рукопись;
оригинал;
in the matter of... что касается... ~ рукопись ~ содержание книги ~ спорный вопрос ~ спорный пункт ~ сущность;
содержание;
form and matter форма и содержание ~ сущность ~ of appropriation rules вопрос о порядке присвоения собственности ~ of confidence конфиденциальный вопрос ~ of confidence секретное дело ~ вопрос, дело;
it is a matter of common knowledge это общеизвестно;
a matter of dispute предмет спора, спорный вопрос ~ of dispute предмет спора ~ of fact реальная действительность ~ of form вопрос формы ~ of inducement вопрос встречного удовлетворения ~ of law вопрос права a ~ of life and death вопрос жизни и смерти, жизненно важный вопрос;
it is a matter of a few hours (days, weeks, etc.) это дело нескольких часов (дней, недель и т. п.) ~ of principle дело принципа ~ of principle принципиальный вопрос a ~ of taste (habit, etc.) дело вкуса (привычки и т. п.) ;
money matters денежные дела;
as matters stand при существующем положении (дел) a ~ of taste (habit, etc.) дело вкуса (привычки и т. п.) ;
money matters денежные дела;
as matters stand при существующем положении (дел) municipal ~ муниципальный вопрос no ~ безразлично;
все равно, неважно;
no matter what несмотря ни на что;
что бы ни было no: ~ matter безразлично, неважно;
no odds неважно, не имеет значения;
in no time очень быстро, в мгновение ока no ~ безразлично;
все равно, неважно;
no matter what несмотря ни на что;
что бы ни было official ~ служебное дело parochial ~ вопрос, находящийся в ведении местной администрации printed ~ бандероль printed ~ печатное издание printed ~ печатный материал public ~ вопрос, представляющий общественный интерес public ~ государственный вопрос secretarial ~ должностные обязанности секретаря secretarial ~ круг обязанностей секретаря subject ~ объект договора subject ~ предмет subject ~ содержание subject ~ тема urgent ~ срочное дело what's the ~? в чем дело?, что случилось?;
what's the matter with you? что с вами? what's the ~? в чем дело?, что случилось?;
what's the matter with you? что с вами? -
40 common
['komən] 1. adjective1) (seen or happening often; quite normal or usual: a common occurrence; These birds are not so common nowadays.) almindelig2) (belonging equally to, or shared by, more than one: This knowledge is common to all of us; We share a common language.) kendt; fælles3) (publicly owned: common property.) offentlig4) (coarse or impolite: She uses some very common expressions.) simpel; vulgær5) (of ordinary, not high, social rank: the common people.) jævn; almindelig6) (of a noun, not beginning with a capital letter (except at the beginning of a sentence): The house is empty.) fællesnavn2. noun((a piece of) public land for everyone to use, with few or no buildings: the village common.) fællesareal- commoner- common knowledge
- common law
- common-law
- commonplace
- common-room
- common sense
- the Common Market
- the House of Commons
- the Commons
- in common* * *['komən] 1. adjective1) (seen or happening often; quite normal or usual: a common occurrence; These birds are not so common nowadays.) almindelig2) (belonging equally to, or shared by, more than one: This knowledge is common to all of us; We share a common language.) kendt; fælles3) (publicly owned: common property.) offentlig4) (coarse or impolite: She uses some very common expressions.) simpel; vulgær5) (of ordinary, not high, social rank: the common people.) jævn; almindelig6) (of a noun, not beginning with a capital letter (except at the beginning of a sentence): The house is empty.) fællesnavn2. noun((a piece of) public land for everyone to use, with few or no buildings: the village common.) fællesareal- commoner- common knowledge
- common law
- common-law
- commonplace
- common-room
- common sense
- the Common Market
- the House of Commons
- the Commons
- in common
См. также в других словарях:
Public Knowledge Project — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda El Public Knowledge Project PKP, es una iniciativa de investigación sin ánimo de lucro de la Facultad de Educación[1] de la Universidad de British Columbia, el Centro Canadiense para estudios en publicación[2] en la… … Wikipedia Español
public knowledge — index common knowledge Burton s Legal Thesaurus. William C. Burton. 2006 … Law dictionary
Public Knowledge Project — Das Public Knowledge Project (PKP) ist eine Forschungs und Software Entwicklungsinitiative, die von vier Partnern getragen wird: von den erziehungswissenschaftlichen Fachbereichen der University of British Columbia und der Stanford University… … Deutsch Wikipedia
public knowledge — noun knowledge that is available to anyone • Syn: ↑general knowledge • Hypernyms: ↑cognition, ↑knowledge, ↑noesis • Hyponyms: ↑common knowledge, ↑light, ↑ … Useful english dictionary
Public Knowledge Project — The Public Knowledge Project is a non profit research initiative of the Faculty of Education [ [http://www.educ.ubc.ca/ ] ] at the University of British Columbia, the Canadian Centre for Studies in Publishing [ [http://www.ccsp.sfu.ca/ ] ] at… … Wikipedia
Public Knowledge — [cite web url=http://www.publicknowledge.org/about/who title=Who we are accessdate=2007 07 04 year=2007 publisher=Public Knowledge] Public Knowledge s work focuses on the three IP s of communications and copyright policy: information policy,… … Wikipedia
public knowledge — Synonyms and related words: PR, ballyhoo, blurb, bright light, celebrity, common knowledge, cry, currency, daylight, eclat, exposure, fame, famousness, glare, hoopla, hue and cry, limelight, maximum dissemination, notoriety, plug, press notice,… … Moby Thesaurus
(be) public knowledge — be common/public ˈknowledge idiom to be sth that everyone knows, especially in a particular community or group • Their relationship is common knowledge. Main entry: ↑knowledgeidiom … Useful english dictionary
Knowledge Mobilization — may be defined as putting available knowledge into active service to benefit society. It may be knowledge that has been gathered through systematic study or through experience. Both the research knowledge and experiential wisdom are worth sharing … Wikipedia
Knowledge building — theory was created and developed by Carl Bereiter and Marlene Scardamalia in order to describe what a community of learners need to accomplish in order to create knowledge. The theory address the need to educate people for the knowledge age… … Wikipedia
Public humanities — is a term used to describe the work of organizations, including federal and state humanities agencies, that support and present lectures, exhibitions, and other programs for the general public on topics that include history, philosophy, and the… … Wikipedia