-
21 experiment
1) эксперимент, опыт•- cage experiment
- chasing experiment
- check experiment
- complex experiment
- control experiment
- crossover experiment
- double blind experiment
- feeding experiment
- field experiment
- long-term experiment
- multiple-factor experiment
- multiplied experiment
- pulse chase experiment
- rearing experiment
- single-burst experiment
- social experiment
- tracer experiment
- trial experiment -
22 complex
1) комплекс
2) комплексно
3) комплексно-
4) комплексно-сопряженный
5) комплексный
6) комплексный полный
7) сложный
8) графа
9) клеточное разбиение
10) комплект
11) многосложный
– activated complex
– cell complex
– chamber complex
– complex admittance
– complex conjugate
– complex declarator
– complex experiment
– complex fertilizer
– complex fraction
– complex impedance
– complex ion
– complex manifold
– complex matrix
– complex molecule
– complex number
– complex of segments
– complex plane
– complex quantity
– complex root
– complex sinusoidal
– complex spectrum
– complex target
– complex variable
– complex vein
– cone of a complex
– conjugate complex
– dissection of a complex
– fuel-energy complex
– inclusion complex
– infallibility complex
– linear complex
– metal-ion complex
– vietoris complex
complex plane analyzer — <tech.> анализатор векторный
complex sinusoidal quantity — комплексная синусоидальная величина
Kamsko-Achinsk Fuel-Energy Complex — <energ.> комплекс топливно-энергетический Камско-Ачинский
method of complex gradients — <math.> метод сопряженных градиентов
normalized standard complex — нормализованный стандартный комплекс
-
23 experiment
эксперимент, опыт- factorial experiment
- gedanken experiment
- mental experiment
- single-factor experiment
- thought experimentEnglish-Russian dictionary of computer science and programming > experiment
-
24 experiment
[̘. ̈n.ɪksˈperɪmənt]complex experiment многофакторный эксперемент experiment опыт, эксперимент experiment производить опыты, экспериментировать (on, with) experiment эксперимент gedanken experiment упрощенный мысленный эксперимент mental experiment мысленный эксперимент -
25 experiment
̘. ̈n.ɪksˈperɪmənt
1. сущ. опыт, проба, эксперимент to carry out, conduct, perform, run an experiment on ≈ проводить эксперимент на control, controlled experiment ≈ управляемый эксперимент a chemistry experiment ≈ химический опыт physics experiment ≈ физический опыт
2. гл. производить опыты, экспериментировать (on, with, in, upon) You can get into danger by experimenting in magic. ≈ Эксперименты с магией могут быть опасными. Many people disapprove of scientists who experiment on animals. ≈ Многие люди протестуют против проведения научных экспериментов на животных. Scientists experiment with rats in order to discover facts about human behaviour. ≈ Ученые проводят эксперименты на крысах с целью выяснить, как устроено человеческое поведение. опыт, эксперимент - as an * в порядке опыта;
в качестве эксперимента - an * in chemistry химический опыт - *s on animals опыты на животных - to make /to carry out/ an * проводить опыт экспериментирование, постановка опытов - the result of some centuries of * результат экспериментирования в течение нескольких столетий - to prove smth. by * доказать что-л. с помощью эксперимента производить опыты, экспериментировать - to * on guinea-pigs проводить опыты на морских свинках - to * with teaching methods экспериментировать в области методов обучения - several medicines, even narcotics, were *ed with некоторые лекарства и даже наркотики подвергались экспериментальному изучению пробовать( что-л., особ. для развлечения) ;
баловаться( чем-л.) complex ~ многофакторный эксперемент experiment опыт, эксперимент ~ производить опыты, экспериментировать (on, with) ~ эксперимент gedanken ~ упрощенный мысленный эксперимент mental ~ мысленный экспериментБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > experiment
-
26 complex atmospheric energetics experiment
Англо-русский словарь по экологии > complex atmospheric energetics experiment
-
27 complex atmospheric energetics experiment
Экология: комплексный энергетический экспериментУниверсальный англо-русский словарь > complex atmospheric energetics experiment
-
28 conduct an experiment
-
29 manned experiment
run an experiment — проводить опыт; эксперимент
-
30 full-scale experiment
полномасштабный эксперимент; натурное испытание; промышленное испытаниеrun an experiment — проводить опыт; эксперимент
English-Russian dictionary on nuclear energy > full-scale experiment
-
31 Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex OPSEK
Космический летательный аппарат: ОПСЭК, орбитальный пилотируемый сборочно-экспериментальный комплекс, OPSEKУниверсальный англо-русский словарь > Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex OPSEK
-
32 многофакторный эксперимент
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > многофакторный эксперимент
-
33 эксперимент составной
матем. complex experimentБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > эксперимент составной
-
34 CAENEX
-
35 OPSEK
1) Общая лексика: Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex2) Космический летательный аппарат: ОПСЭК, орбитальный пилотируемый сборочно-экспериментальный комплекс, Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex OPSEK -
36 Stibitz, George R.
SUBJECT AREA: Electronics and information technology[br]b. 20 April 1904 York, Pennsylvania, USA[br]American mathematician responsible for the conception of the Bell Laboratories "Complex " computer.[br]Stibitz spent his early years in Dayton, Ohio, and obtained his first degree at Denison University, Granville, Ohio, his MS from Union College, Schenectady, New York, in 1927 and his PhD in mathematical physics from Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, in 1930. After working for a time for General Electric, he joined Bell Laboratories to work on various communications problems. In 1937 he started to experiment at home with telephone relays as the basis of a calculator for addition, multiplication and division. Initially this was based on binary arithmetic, but later he used binary-coded decimal (BCD) and was able to cope with complex numbers. In November 1938 the ideas were officially taken up by Bell Laboratories and, with S.B.Williams as Project Manager, Stibitz built a complex-number computer known as "Complex", or Relay I, which became operational on 8 January 1940.With the outbreak of the Second World War, he was co-opted to the National Defence Research Council to work on anti-aircraft (AA) gun control, and this led to Bell Laboratories Relay II computer, which was completed in 1943 and which had 500 relays, bi-quinary code and selfchecking of errors. A further computer, Relay III, was used for ballistic simulation of actual AA shell explosions and was followed by more machines before and after Stibitz left Bell after the end of the war. Stibitz then became a computer consultant, involved in particular with the development of the UNIVAC computer by John Mauchly and J.Presper Eckert.[br]Principal Honours and DistinctionsInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Emanuel R.Priore Award 1977.Bibliography1957, with J.A.Larrivee, Mathematics and Computers, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1967, "The Relay computer at the Bell Laboratories", Datamation 35.Further ReadingE.Loveday, 1977, "George Stibitz and the Bell Labs Relay computer", Datamation 80. M.R.Williams, 1985, A History of Computing Technology, London: Prentice-Hall.KF -
37 Creativity
Put in this bald way, these aims sound utopian. How utopian they areor rather, how imminent their realization-depends on how broadly or narrowly we interpret the term "creative." If we are willing to regard all human complex problem solving as creative, then-as we will point out-successful programs for problem solving mechanisms that simulate human problem solvers already exist, and a number of their general characteristics are known. If we reserve the term "creative" for activities like discovery of the special theory of relativity or the composition of Beethoven's Seventh Symphony, then no example of a creative mechanism exists at the present time. (Simon, 1979, pp. 144-145)Among the questions that can now be given preliminary answers in computational terms are the following: how can ideas from very different sources be spontaneously thought of together? how can two ideas be merged to produce a new structure, which shows the influence of both ancestor ideas without being a mere "cut-and-paste" combination? how can the mind be "primed," so that one will more easily notice serendipitous ideas? why may someone notice-and remember-something fairly uninteresting, if it occurs in an interesting context? how can a brief phrase conjure up an entire melody from memory? and how can we accept two ideas as similar ("love" and "prove" as rhyming, for instance) in respect of a feature not identical in both? The features of connectionist AI models that suggest answers to these questions are their powers of pattern completion, graceful degradation, sensitization, multiple constraint satisfaction, and "best-fit" equilibration.... Here, the important point is that the unconscious, "insightful," associative aspects of creativity can be explained-in outline, at least-by AI methods. (Boden, 1996, p. 273)There thus appears to be an underlying similarity in the process involved in creative innovation and social independence, with common traits and postures required for expression of both behaviors. The difference is one of product-literary, musical, artistic, theoretical products on the one hand, opinions on the other-rather than one of process. In both instances the individual must believe that his perceptions are meaningful and valid and be willing to rely upon his own interpretations. He must trust himself sufficiently that even when persons express opinions counter to his own he can proceed on the basis of his own perceptions and convictions. (Coopersmith, 1967, p. 58)he average level of ego strength and emotional stability is noticeably higher among creative geniuses than among the general population, though it is possibly lower than among men of comparable intelligence and education who go into administrative and similar positions. High anxiety and excitability appear common (e.g. Priestley, Darwin, Kepler) but full-blown neurosis is quite rare. (Cattell & Butcher, 1970, p. 315)he insight that is supposed to be required for such work as discovery turns out to be synonymous with the familiar process of recognition; and other terms commonly used in the discussion of creative work-such terms as "judgment," "creativity," or even "genius"-appear to be wholly dispensable or to be definable, as insight is, in terms of mundane and well-understood concepts. (Simon, 1989, p. 376)From the sketch material still in existence, from the condition of the fragments, and from the autographs themselves we can draw definite conclusions about Mozart's creative process. To invent musical ideas he did not need any stimulation; they came to his mind "ready-made" and in polished form. In contrast to Beethoven, who made numerous attempts at shaping his musical ideas until he found the definitive formulation of a theme, Mozart's first inspiration has the stamp of finality. Any Mozart theme has completeness and unity; as a phenomenon it is a Gestalt. (Herzmann, 1964, p. 28)Great artists enlarge the limits of one's perception. Looking at the world through the eyes of Rembrandt or Tolstoy makes one able to perceive aspects of truth about the world which one could not have achieved without their aid. Freud believed that science was adaptive because it facilitated mastery of the external world; but was it not the case that many scientific theories, like works of art, also originated in phantasy? Certainly, reading accounts of scientific discovery by men of the calibre of Einstein compelled me to conclude that phantasy was not merely escapist, but a way of reaching new insights concerning the nature of reality. Scientific hypotheses require proof; works of art do not. Both are concerned with creating order, with making sense out of the world and our experience of it. (Storr, 1993, p. xii)The importance of self-esteem for creative expression appears to be almost beyond disproof. Without a high regard for himself the individual who is working in the frontiers of his field cannot trust himself to discriminate between the trivial and the significant. Without trust in his own powers the person seeking improved solutions or alternative theories has no basis for distinguishing the significant and profound innovation from the one that is merely different.... An essential component of the creative process, whether it be analysis, synthesis, or the development of a new perspective or more comprehensive theory, is the conviction that one's judgment in interpreting the events is to be trusted. (Coopersmith, 1967, p. 59)In the daily stream of thought these four different stages [preparation; incubation; illumination or inspiration; and verification] constantly overlap each other as we explore different problems. An economist reading a Blue Book, a physiologist watching an experiment, or a business man going through his morning's letters, may at the same time be "incubating" on a problem which he proposed to himself a few days ago, be accumulating knowledge in "preparation" for a second problem, and be "verifying" his conclusions to a third problem. Even in exploring the same problem, the mind may be unconsciously incubating on one aspect of it, while it is consciously employed in preparing for or verifying another aspect. (Wallas, 1926, p. 81)he basic, bisociative pattern of the creative synthesis [is] the sudden interlocking of two previously unrelated skills, or matrices of thought. (Koestler, 1964, p. 121)11) The Earliest Stages in the Creative Process Involve a Commerce with DisorderEven to the creator himself, the earliest effort may seem to involve a commerce with disorder. For the creative order, which is an extension of life, is not an elaboration of the established, but a movement beyond the established, or at least a reorganization of it and often of elements not included in it. The first need is therefore to transcend the old order. Before any new order can be defined, the absolute power of the established, the hold upon us of what we know and are, must be broken. New life comes always from outside our world, as we commonly conceive that world. This is the reason why, in order to invent, one must yield to the indeterminate within him, or, more precisely, to certain illdefined impulses which seem to be of the very texture of the ungoverned fullness which John Livingston Lowes calls "the surging chaos of the unexpressed." (Ghiselin, 1985, p. 4)New life comes always from outside our world, as we commonly conceive our world. This is the reason why, in order to invent, one must yield to the indeterminate within him, or, more precisely, to certain illdefined impulses which seem to be of the very texture of the ungoverned fullness which John Livingston Lowes calls "the surging chaos of the unexpressed." Chaos and disorder are perhaps the wrong terms for that indeterminate fullness and activity of the inner life. For it is organic, dynamic, full of tension and tendency. What is absent from it, except in the decisive act of creation, is determination, fixity, and commitment to one resolution or another of the whole complex of its tensions. (Ghiselin, 1952, p. 13)[P]sychoanalysts have principally been concerned with the content of creative products, and with explaining content in terms of the artist's infantile past. They have paid less attention to examining why the artist chooses his particular activity to express, abreact or sublimate his emotions. In short, they have not made much distinction between art and neurosis; and, since the former is one of the blessings of mankind, whereas the latter is one of the curses, it seems a pity that they should not be better differentiated....Psychoanalysis, being fundamentally concerned with drive and motive, might have been expected to throw more light upon what impels the creative person that in fact it has. (Storr, 1993, pp. xvii, 3)A number of theoretical approaches were considered. Associative theory, as developed by Mednick (1962), gained some empirical support from the apparent validity of the Remote Associates Test, which was constructed on the basis of the theory.... Koestler's (1964) bisociative theory allows more complexity to mental organization than Mednick's associative theory, and postulates "associative contexts" or "frames of reference." He proposed that normal, non-creative, thought proceeds within particular contexts or frames and that the creative act involves linking together previously unconnected frames.... Simonton (1988) has developed associative notions further and explored the mathematical consequences of chance permutation of ideas....Like Koestler, Gruber (1980; Gruber and Davis, 1988) has based his analysis on case studies. He has focused especially on Darwin's development of the theory of evolution. Using piagetian notions, such as assimilation and accommodation, Gruber shows how Darwin's system of ideas changed very slowly over a period of many years. "Moments of insight," in Gruber's analysis, were the culminations of slow long-term processes.... Finally, the information-processing approach, as represented by Simon (1966) and Langley et al. (1987), was considered.... [Simon] points out the importance of good problem representations, both to ensure search is in an appropriate problem space and to aid in developing heuristic evaluations of possible research directions.... The work of Langley et al. (1987) demonstrates how such search processes, realized in computer programs, can indeed discover many basic laws of science from tables of raw data.... Boden (1990a, 1994) has stressed the importance of restructuring the problem space in creative work to develop new genres and paradigms in the arts and sciences. (Gilhooly, 1996, pp. 243-244; emphasis in original)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Creativity
-
38 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
39 CAENEX
1) Экология: complex atmospheric energetics experiment2) Океанография: Complete Atmospheric Energetics Experiment -
40 subject
̘. ̈n.ˈsʌbdʒɪkt
1. сущ.
1) а) тема, предмет разговора;
сюжет;
муз. главная тема to address, deal with, discuss, take up, treat a subject ≈ затрагивать какую-л. тему to bring up a subject, to broach a subject ≈ начать обсуждение темы to tackle a subject ≈ энергично, оживленно обсуждать какую-л. тему dwell on a sore subject traverse a subject exhaust a subject delicate subject favorite subject thorny subject ticklish subject Syn: topic б) грам. подлежащее;
лог. субъект complex subject compound subject grammatical subject в) повод, причина( for - к чему-л.)
2) а) объект, предмет (of) б) дисциплина, предмет
3) а) субъект, человек;
мед. труп, подлежащий вскрытию (в частности, для анатомического театра) б) подданный, гражданин в) филос. субъект logical subject ≈ логический субъект ∙
2. прил.
1) а) зависимый, подвластный, подневольный, подчиненный Syn: dependent б) подверженный, склонный
2) подлежащий (произведению какой-л. обработки)
3. гл.
1) а) подчинять, покорять (to) The people were subjected to the conqueror's rule. ≈ Люди были подчинены законам завоевателей. б) подвергать( воздействию, влиянию и т. п.) (to) This metal should not be subjected to too high temperatures. ≈ Этот металл не следует подвергать воздействию высоких температур. Syn: expose
2) представлять, вносить (документ) предмет, тема (разговора и т. п.) - serious * серьезный вопрос - a * for discussion тема для дискуссии - to talk on serious *s говорить на серьезные темы - to change the * перевести разговор (на другую тему) - to return to one's * вернуться к прерванному разговору - to lead smb. on to the * of smth. навести кого-л. на разговор /на тему/ о чем-л. - enough on this * довольно об этом - the visit remains the * of animated discussion визит продолжает оживленно комментироваться сюжет, тема - tragic(al) * трагический сюжет - historical * историческая тема - the * of a play сюжет пьесы - a painter with a leaning to mythological *s художник со склонностью к мифологическим сюжетам предмет, дисциплина - compulsory *s обязательные предметы - * abstracting journal тематический реферативный журнал - * specialist отраслевой специалист - * label (полиграфия) отраслевая помета( в словаре и т. п.) объект, предмет - the * of an experiment объект опыта (медицина) труп (при вскрытии) повод, основание - a * for pity повод для сожаления - a * of press comment предмет комментариев в печати подданный - British * британский подданный субъект, человек - a good hypnotic * человек, легко поддающийся гипнозу /внушению/ - a hysterical * человек, страдающий истерией - a refractory * субъект, с которым нет сладу (грамматика) подлежащее - the logical * логическое подлежащее (философское) (юридическое) субъект - consious /thinking/ * мыслящий субъект - * of international law субъект международного права субстанция, реальность( музыкальное) тема - second * побочная тема (в сонатной форме) подчиненный, зависимый, подвластный - * nation * зависимое /несамостоятельное/ государство - to be held * находиться в зависимости /в подчинении/ - states * to foreign rule государства, находящиеся под иностранным владычеством - to be * to the laws of nature подчиняться законам природы (to) подверженный (чему-л.) ;
склонный (к чему-л.) - to be * to colds быть подверженным простуде - he is * to anger он вспыльчив - to be * to temptation легко поддаваться соблазну - Japan is exceedingly * to earthquakes Япония чрезвычайно подвержена землетрясениям (to) подлежащий (чему-л.) ;
зависящий( от чего-л.), обусловленный( чем-л.) - plan is * to modification в план могут быть внесены изменения - a treaty is * to ratification (любой) договор подлежит ратификации - to be * to a rule подпадать под правило - an article * to duty предмет, подлежащий обложению пошлиной - he has done things that are * to criticism некоторые его поступки нельзя не критиковать - the price is * to a discount of 5% цена подлежит скидке в 5: - to be * to call (коммерческое) подлежать возврату по первому требованию;
(военное) подлежать призыву - to be * to market fluctuations зависеть от колебаний рынка (информатика) предметный - * index предметный указатель;
индекс подчинять, покорять - to * a nation to smb.'s rule подчинить страну чьему-л. господству - to * tribes покорять племена - to * smb. to one's will подчинить кого-л. своей воле - he was unwilling to * himself to any inconvenience ему не хотелось мириться с какими бы то ни было неудобствами подвергать - to * smb. to cross-examination подвергнуть кого-л. перекрестному допросу - to * smb. to an operation сделать кому-л. операцию - to * oneself to ridicule стать предметом насмешек - he was *ed to severe criticism он подвергся суровой критике - the lecturer was *ed to very close questioning лектора забросали очень быстрыми вопросами - he refused to * himself to their judgement он отказался подчиниться их решению представлять - to * one's plans to smb.'s consideration представлять планы на чье-л. рассмотрение British ~ подданный Великобритании to change the ~ переменить тему разговора;
to traverse a subject обсудить вопрос core ~s основные учебные предметы (в учебном заведении) ;
основные вопросы( обсуждения) ~ тема;
предмет разговора;
сюжет;
to dwell on a sore subject останавливаться на больном вопросе ~ субъект, человек;
a hysterical subject истерический тип legal ~ субъект права main ~ основная дисциплина main ~ профилирующий предмет ~ предмет, дисциплина;
mathematics is my favourite subject математика - мой любимый предмет natural-born ~ подданный по рождению, урожденный подданный ~ труп (для вскрытия) ;
on the subject of касаясь (чего-л.) ;
while we are on the subject of money may I ask you... раз уж мы заговорили о деньгах, могу я узнать... optional ~ факультативный предмет subject вопрос ~ муз. главная тема ~ гражданин ~ дисциплина ~ объект, предмет (of) ~ объект ~ повод (for - к чему-л.) ;
a subject for pity повод для сожаления ~ подвергать (воздействию, влиянию и т. п.) ~ подвергать ~ вчт. подвергать ~ подверженный (to) ~ подданный ~ грам. подлежащее ~ подлежащий (to) ~ подчиненный, подвластный, зависимый ~ подчиненный, подвластный;
subject nations несамостоятельные государства ~ подчинять, покорять (to) ~ подчинять ~ предмет, дисциплина;
mathematics is my favourite subject математика - мой любимый предмет ~ предмет (договора, иска и т.п.) ~ предмет ~ представлять;
to subject a plan for consideration представить план на рассмотрение ~ проблема ~ филос. субъект ~ субъект, человек;
a hysterical subject истерический тип ~ субъект ~ тема;
предмет разговора;
сюжет;
to dwell on a sore subject останавливаться на больном вопросе ~ тема, вопрос, предмет ~ тема ~ труп (для вскрытия) ;
on the subject of касаясь (чего-л.) ;
while we are on the subject of money may I ask you... раз уж мы заговорили о деньгах, могу я узнать... ~ представлять;
to subject a plan for consideration представить план на рассмотрение ~ повод (for - к чему-л.) ;
a subject for pity повод для сожаления ~ подчиненный, подвластный;
subject nations несамостоятельные государства ~ of action предмет иска ~ of contention предмет спора ~ of controversy предмет спора ~ of sale товар ~ to в зависимости от ~ to зависящий от ~ to ограниченный ~ to подвергать ~ to подверженный ~ to подчиненный ~ to подчинять ~ to поскольку иное не предусматривается ~ to поскольку иное не содержится ~ to поскольку это допускается ~ to при соблюдении ~ to при условии, допуская, если ~ to при условии ~ to при условии соблюдения ~ to с сохранением в силе ~ to alteration в случае изменения ~ to approval в случае одобрения ~ to call подлежащий погашению по первому требованию ~ to change without notice при внесении изменений без уведомления ~ to collection в зависимости от поступления денежных средств ~ to collection при условии инкассации ~ to conditions на условиях ~ to confirmation подлежащий подтверждению ~ to contract при условии соблюдения договора ~ to duty при условии уплаты таможенной пошлины ~ to final payment при условии внесения последнего платежа ~ to final payment при условии окончательного расчета ~ to final payment при условии погашения долга ~ to goods unsold в зависимости от количества непроданных товаров ~ to necessary changes being made при условии внесения необходимых изменений ~ to notification в соответствии с уведомлением ~ to prior sale в зависимости от предыдущей продажи ~ to prosecution в соответствии с предъявленным иском ~ to proviso с оговоркой ~ to repurchase при условии обратной покупки ~ to revision подлежащицй пересмотру ~ to tax облагаемый налогом ~ to tax подлежит налогообложению ~ to uncertainty зависящий от неопределенности take ~ to принимать дело к рассмотрению to change the ~ переменить тему разговора;
to traverse a subject обсудить вопрос traverse: ~ (подробно) обсуждать;
to traverse a subject обсудить вопрос со всех сторон ~ труп (для вскрытия) ;
on the subject of касаясь (чего-л.) ;
while we are on the subject of money may I ask you... раз уж мы заговорили о деньгах, могу я узнать...
См. также в других словарях:
Complex regional pain syndrome — Complex regional pain syndrome/Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (CRPS/RSD) Classification and external resources ICD 10 M89.0, G56.4 ICD 9 … Wikipedia
Experiment — Experimental redirects here. For the musical classification, see Experimental music. For other uses, see Experiment (disambiguation). Even very young children perform rudimentary experiments in order to learn about the world. An experiment is a… … Wikipedia
controlled experiment — noun : a complex experiment including one or more control experiments or blank determinations along with the actual experimental tests … Useful english dictionary
Miller–Urey experiment — The experiment The Miller and Urey experiment[1] (or Urey–Miller experiment)[2] was an experiment that simulated hypothetical conditions thought at the time to be present on the earl … Wikipedia
Miller-Urey experiment — The Miller Urey experiment (or Urey Miller experiment) was an experiment that simulated hypothetical conditions present on the early Earth and tested for the occurrence of chemical evolution. Specifically, the experiment tested Oparin and Haldane … Wikipedia
Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex — CG rendering of OPSEK The Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex (Orbitalniy Pilotiruemyi Eksperimentalniy Kompleks[1]) (OPSEK) is the planned Russian successor to the International Space Station, with the main goal of supporting deep… … Wikipedia
Blind experiment — A blind or blinded experiment is a scientific experiment where some of the people involved are prevented from knowing certain information that might lead to conscious or subconscious bias on their part, invalidating the results. For example, when … Wikipedia
Stern–Gerlach experiment — In quantum mechanics, the Stern–Gerlach experiment [Walther Gerlach Otto Stern, Das magnetische Moment des Silberatoms , Zeitschrift für Physik 9, 353 355 (1922).] , named after Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach, is an important 1922 experiment on… … Wikipedia
Orbital Piloted Assembly and Experiment Complex — (OPSEK, en français : complexe expérimental et assemblage orbital piloté) est le successeur russe prévu à la Station spatiale internationale, avec l objectif principal de soutenir l exploration spatiale[1]. Sommaire 1 Vue d ensemble 2 … Wikipédia en Français
The Oregon Experiment — Author(s) … Wikipedia
Liquid Tension Experiment — Infobox musical artist Name = Liquid Tension Experiment Img capt = Liquid Tension Experiment performing in Chicago in 2008. From left: Tony Levin, John Petrucci, Jordan Rudess, Mike Portnoy Background = group or band Years active = 1997 1999,… … Wikipedia