-
1 binding precedent
юр. обязывающий прецедент (решение вышестоящего суда, которому обязан следовать нижестоящий суд)Syn:ruling precedent, mandatory precedent* * * -
2 binding precedent
1) Юридический термин: прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу2) Деловая лексика: обязывающий прецедент -
3 binding precedent
прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу -
4 binding
1. n переплёт2. n связывание3. n вязка снопов; уборка сноповязалкойmodule binding — увязка модулей; связывание модулей
4. n обвязка, обшивка; оковка5. n спец. бандаж; связь6. n сращивание7. n накладывание ловчего пояса на ствол дерева8. n крепление9. n физ. хим. связь10. a связующийbinding material — связующий материал, вяжущее
11. a вяжущий12. a обязывающий, обязательныйbinding precedent — прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу
Синонимический ряд:1. required (adj.) committing; essential; necessary; obligatory; required; requisite2. restraining (adj.) confining; hobbling; limiting; restraining; restrictive; tying3. coupling (noun) adhesive; band; coupling; fastener; junction; wire; wrapper4. associating (verb) affiliating; allying; associating; combining; connecting; joining; linking; relating5. charging (verb) charging; committing; obligating; pledging6. dressing (verb) bandaging; dressing7. tying (verb) fastening; knotting; securing; tie up; tying; tying up -
5 precedent
[̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt]authoritative precedent авторитетный прецедент authoritative precedent заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding precedent обязывающий прецедент precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие condition precedent предварительное условие declaratory precedent деклараторный прецедент judicial precedent судебный прецедент original precedent первичный прецедент persuasive precedent юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие precedent предшествующий precedent прецедент precedent судебный прецедент -
6 precedent
1) прецедент2) предшествующий; предварительный•- applied precedentprecedent (exactly) applicable to the act [to the fact] — прецедент, (полностью) применимый к деянию [факту];
- binding precedent
- governing precedent
- judicial precedent
- leading precedent
- ruling precedent
- solid precedent
- sound precedent* * * -
7 binding
1. сущ.1) тех. связывание, скрепление, соединение ( действие)Syn:fastening, lockingSee:2) тех. соединение (любой предмет, с помощью которого что-л. связывается, соединяется)Syn:3) юр. обязательство4) с.-х. вязка (снопов)2. прил.эк., юр. обязательный, обязывающий (о каком-л. действии или соглашении, которое имеет юридическую силу и должно быть исполнено, чтобы избежать нарушения закона)This contract is not binding until approved by the appropriate authorities. — Этот контракт не накладывает никаких обязательств до тех пор, пока не будет одобрен соответствующими властными органами.
A bid at an auction is legally binding and you are unable to withdraw your offer. — Заявка на аукционе является юридически обязывающей, и вы не можете отозвать свое предложение.
See:
* * *
обязывающий, обязательный, связывающий. -
8 binding
связывающий; связывание; обязательныйbinding precedent — прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу
-
9 precedent
1. прил.общ. предшествующий2. сущ.юр. прецедент (решение суда, служащее образцом при решении аналогичных дел в системе англосаксонского права; в системе английского права формулируется как решение высших судов, имеющее обязательную силу как для них самих, так и для низших судов; на практике это означает, что решения палаты лордов не могут игнорироваться нижестоящими судами; решения Апелляционного суда должны применяться в дальнейшем всеми судами, кроме палаты лордов; Высокий суд выносит решения, которые обязательны для все судов, кроме палаты лордов и Апелляционного суда; прецеденты публикуются в специальных сборниках, как правило, называющихся law reports; институты договорного права, ответственности за нарушение обязательств регулируются исключительно прецедентами)to constitute [create, establish\] a precedent — создавать прецедент
Syn:See:binding precedent, persuasive precedent, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom -
10 precedent
̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt
1. сущ. прецедент without precedent ≈ беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента there's no precedent for this ≈ это беспрецедентный случай to set/create/establish a precedent ≈ создать прецедент to invoke a precedent ≈ сослаться на прецедент
2. прил.
1) предшествующий, предыдущий precedent chapter ≈ предыдущая глава Syn: previous, former
2) превосходящий precedent in nobility ≈ превосходящий в знатности (судебный) прецедент - to set /to create/ a * создать прецедент - to invoke a * сослаться на прецедент - without * беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента, беспримерный, небывалый - there's no * for this это беспрецедентный случай предшествующий - * events предшествующие события - * chapter предшествующая глава - conditions * предварительные условия authoritative ~ авторитетный прецедент authoritative ~ заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding ~ обязывающий прецедент ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие condition ~ предварительное условие declaratory ~ деклараторный прецедент judicial ~ судебный прецедент original ~ первичный прецедент persuasive ~ юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие ~ предшествующий ~ прецедент ~ судебный прецедентБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > precedent
-
11 final and binding
binding precedent — прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу
-
12 final and binding on
binding precedent — прецедент, имеющий обязательную силу
-
13 persuasive precedent
юр. убедительный прецедент (прецедент, который не является судебным решением высшей инстанции и которому суд не обязан следовать, но тем не менее следует по причине аналогичности ситуации и разумности применения данного решения)Syn:See:* * * -
14 mandatory precedent
юр. = binding precedent
См. также в других словарях:
binding precedent — See: precedent Category: Criminal Law Category: If, When & Where to File a Lawsuit Category: Mediation, Arbitration & Collaborative Law Category: Representing Yourself in Court Category: S … Law dictionary
Binding precedent — In law, a binding precedent (also mandatory precedent or binding authority) is a precedent which must be followed by all lower courts under common law legal systems. In English law it is usually created by the decision of a higher court, such as… … Wikipedia
binding precedent — legal decision on a case which must be followed in similar future cases (Law) … English contemporary dictionary
Precedent — In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. DescriptionThe precedent on an issue is … Wikipedia
precedent — noun ADJECTIVE ▪ bad, dangerous, terrible, unfortunate ▪ good, important, strong ▪ There is a strong precedent for such a strategy … Collocations dictionary
precedent — noun prɛsɪd(ə)nt an earlier event or action serving as an example or guide. ↘Law a previous case or legal decision that may be or (binding precedent) must be followed in subsequent similar cases. adjective prɪ si:d(ə)nt, prɛsɪ preceding in time,… … English new terms dictionary
precedent — pre·ce·dent 1 /pri sēd ənt, pre səd / adj [Middle French, from Latin praecedent praecedens, present participle of praecedere to go ahead of, come before]: prior in time, order, arrangement, or significance see also condition precedent at… … Law dictionary
binding — adj. VERBS ▪ be ▪ become ADVERB ▪ absolutely ▪ legally, morally PREPOSITION … Collocations dictionary
binding authority — Sources of law that must be taken into account by a judge in deciding a case; for example, statutes or decisions by a higher court of the same state on point. See precedent … Black's law dictionary
binding authority — Sources of law that must be taken into account by a judge in deciding a case; for example, statutes or decisions by a higher court of the same state on point. See precedent … Black's law dictionary
Persuasive precedent — (also persuasive authority) is precedent or other legal writing that is related to the case at hand but is not a binding precedent on the court under common law legal systems such as English law. However, persuasive authority may guide the judge… … Wikipedia