-
121 ἀκούω
ἀκούω fut. ἀκούσω SibOr 4, 175; Mt 12:19; 13:14 (Is 6:9); J 5:25, 28; 10:16, ἀκούσομαι EpArist 5; Ac 3:22 (Dt 18:15); 28:28 (freq. w. vv.ll.); 1 aor. ἤκουσα; pf. ἀκήκοα; ptc. ἠκουκώς Hs 5, 4, 2. Pass.: fut. ἀκουσθήσομαι; 1 aor. ἠκούσθην; pf. 3 sg. ἤκουσται Dt 4:32 (Hom.+) ‘hear’, as a passive respondent to λέγω.① lit. to have or exercise the faculty of hearing, hearⓐ abs. τὰ ὦτα ἀκούουσιν Mt 13:16; κωφοὶ ἀ. 11:5; cp. Mk 7:37; Lk 7:22; τοῖς ὠσὶν βαρέως ἀ. be hard of hearing Mt 13:15 (Is 6:10); ἀκοῇ ἀ. Mt 13:14; Ac 28:26 (both Is 6:9). ἀκούοντες οὐκ ἀκούουσιν they hear and yet do not hear Mt 13:13 (s. Aeschyl., Prom. 448 κλύοντες οὐκ ἤκουον; Demosth. 25 [Against Aristogeiton 1], 89, citing the maxim ὁρῶντας μὴ ὁρᾶν καὶ ἀκούοντας μὴ ἀκούειν), cp. Mk 8:18 (Ezk 12:2) and s. 7 below. In the protasis of a challenge to hearers, by which their attention is drawn to a special difficulty: ὁ ἔχων ὦτα (οὖς) ἀκούειν ἀκουέτω, w. variations (Arrian, Ind. 5, 1 ὅστις ἐθέλει φράζειν …, φραζέτω) Mt 11:15 v.l.; 13:9 v.l., 43 v.l.; Mk 4:9, 23; 7:15 [16] v.l.; Lk 8:8; 14:35 (EBishop, BT 7, ’56, 38–40); Rv 2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22; 13:9. Cp. Ox 1081 verso, 6–8; s. 7 below for the restored text. For the sense of the impv. in these challenges also s. 7. S. οὖς 2.ⓑ w. obj. (on the syntax B-D-F §173; 416, 1; Rob. 506f; on the LXX s. Johannessohn, Kasus, 36; Helbing, Kasussyntax 150ff).α. foll. by a thing as obj. in acc. (Diod S 8, 32, 1 τὶ something) Mt 11:4; 13:17ff; Lk 7:22; 1J 1:1, 3. τὴν φωνήν (UPZ 77 I, 25) Mt 12:19; J 3:8; Ac 22:9 (but see 7 below); 1 Cl 39:3 (Job 4:16); (pass. Mt 2:18 [Jer 38:15]; Rv 18:22). τὸν λόγον Mt 13:20ff; J 5:24. τοὺς λόγους, τὰ ῥήματα Mt 10:14; J 8:47 s. 4 below; Ac 2:22. πολέμους καὶ ἀκοὰς πολέμων Mt 24:6. τὴν βλασφημίαν 26:65. τὸν ἀσπασμόν Lk 1:41. ἄρρητα ῥήματα 2 Cor 12:4. τὸν ἀριθμόν Rv 9:16. τὴν ἀποκάλυψιν Hv 3, 12, 2. Pass. τὰ ἀκουσθέντα what has been heard i.e. the message Hb 2:1. ἠκούσθη ὁ λόγος εἰς τὰ ὦτα τῆς ἐκκλησίας … ἐν Ἰερουσαλήμ the report reached the ears of the church in Jerusalem Ac 11:22. Oft. the obj. is to be supplied fr. context Mt 13:17; Mk 4:15; J 6:60a; Ac 2:37; 8:30; 9:21; Ro 10:14. καθὼς ἀκούω = ἃ ἀ. J 5:30.β. τί τινος hear someth. fr. someone τὴν ἐπαγγελίαν, ἣν ἠκούσατέ μου the promise which you heard from me Ac 1:4. Still other constrs. occur, which are also poss. when the hearing is not directly fr. the mouth of the informant, but involves a report which one has received fr. the pers. in any way at all (s. below 3d). τὶ ἔκ τινος (Od. 15, 374; Hdt. 3, 62 ἐκ τοῦ κήρυκος) 2 Cor 12:6. τὶ παρά τινος (Soph., Oed. R. 7 παρʼ ἀγγέλων; Pla., Rep. 6, 506d; Demosth. 6, 26; Jer 30:8; Jos., Bell. 1, 529) J 8:26, 40 (τὴν ἀλήθειαν ἀ. as Diod S 16, 50, 2); 15:15; Ac 10:22; 28:22; 2 Ti 2:2; w. attraction of the relative λόγων ὧν παρʼ ἐμοῦ ἤκουσας teachings which you have heard from me 1:13; τὶ ἀπό τινος (Thu. 1, 125, 1) 1J 1:5. Hebraistically ἀπὸ τ. στόματός τινος Lk 22:71 (cp. ἐκ τ. στόμ. τ. Ex 23:13; Ezk 3:17; 33:7).γ. foll. by a thing as obj. in gen. (Hdt. 8, 135; X., Cyr. 3, 1, 8; Demosth. 18, 3; B-D-F §173, 2; Rob. 507) hear someth. τῆς βλασφημίας (= τὴν βλ. Mt 26:65) Mk 14:64. συμφωνίας καὶ χορῶν Lk 15:25; τῆς φωνῆς (BGU 1007, 11 [III B.C.] ἀκούσαντες φωνῆς) J 5:25, 28; Ac 9:7 (on the experience of Paul and his companions cp. Maximus Tyr. 9, 7d–f: some see a divine figure, others see nothing but hear a voice, still others both see and hear); 11:7; 22:7 (HMoehring, NovT 3, ’59, 80–99; s. Rob. 506). τῶν λόγων Lk 6:47. τῶν ῥημάτων J 12:47.ⓒ hear, listen to w. gen. of the pers. and a ptc. (Pla., Prot. 320b; X., Symp. 3, 13; Herm. Wr. 12, 8; Jos., Ant. 10, 105 ἤκουσε τοῦ προφήτου ταῦτα λέγοντος): ἠκούσαμεν αὐτοῦ λέγοντος we have heard him say Mk 14:58; ἀκοῦσαι προσευχομένου Παύλου AcPl Ha 2, 12. ἤκουον εἷς ἕκαστος … λαλούντων αὐτῶν each one heard them speaking Ac 2:6, 11; Rv 16:5, 7 (in vs. 7 the altar speaks); Hv 1, 3, 3. W. acc. instead of gen. πᾶν κτίσμα … καὶ τὰ ἐν αὐτοῖς πάντα ἤκουσα λέγοντας (v.l. λέγοντα) Rv 5:13. Used without ptc. w. pronoun only: μου (Dio Chrys. 79 [28], 14) Mk 7:14; Ac 26:3. αὐτῶν Lk 2:46. αὐτοῦ vs. 47; 15:1; 19:48; 21:38; J 3:29 etc. ἡμῶν Ac 24:4.—ἀ. τινὸς περί τινος (since Hdt. 7, 209; IG II, 168 [338 B.C.]) hear someone (speak) about someth. Ac 17:32. ἤκουσεν αὐτοῦ περὶ τῆς … πίστεως he heard him speak about faith Ac 24:24, cp. Hm 11:7.—W. ὅτι foll. (X., Cyr. 3, 3, 18) J 14:28; Ac 22:2.—Abs. οἱ ἀκούοντες the hearers (Diod S 4, 7, 4) Lk 6:27; MPol 7:3. Esp. impv. ἄκουε listen! Mk 12:29 (Dt 6:4); Hs 5, 1, 3; pl. Mk 4:3. ἀκούσατε Ac 7:2; 13:16; AcPl Ha 8, 10. W. συνίετε listen and try to understand Mt 15:10.② legal t.t. to hear a legal case, grant a hearing to someone (X., Hell. 1, 7, 9 al.; PAmh 135, 14; PIand 9, 10; 15; BGU 511 II, 2; POxy 1032, 59) w. παρά τινος: ἐὰν μὴ ἀκούσῃ πρῶτον παρʼ αὐτοῦ without first giving him a hearing J 7:51 (SPancaro, Biblica 53, ’72, 340–61).—Ac 25:22.③ to receive news or information about someth., learn about someth.ⓐ abs. ἀκούσας δὲ ὁ Ἰησοῦς when Jesus learned about it (the death of J. Bapt.) Mt 14:13.—Mk 3:21; 6:14 (s. HLjungvik, ZNW 33, ’34, 90–92); Ro 10:18. W. ἀναγγέλλειν 15:21 (Is 52:15).ⓑ w. gen. of person οὗ οὐκ ἤκουσαν of whom they have not heard Ro 10:14a.—W. acc. of thing (X., Cyr. 1, 1, 4; Diod S 19, 8, 4; Chion, Ep. 12 ἀκ. τὴν τυραννίδα; Herodian 4, 4, 8) learn of τὴν ἀγάπην Phlm 5. τὴν ἀναστροφήν Gal 1:13. τὰ ἔργα τοῦ Χριστοῦ Mt 11:2. τὴν ἐνέδραν the ambush Ac 23:16: Χριστιανισμὸν ἀ. hear Christianity IPhld 6:1; τὴν οἰκονομίαν Eph 3:2. τὴν πίστιν 1:15; Col 1:4. τὴν ὑπομονήν Js 5:11.—Pass. ἀκούεται ἐν ὑμῖν πορνεία it is reported that there is immorality among you 1 Cor 5:1 (schol. on Nicander, Ther. 139 τοῦτο ἐξακούεται=this report is heard). ἐὰν ἀκουσθῇ τοῦτο ἐπὶ τοῦ ἡγεμόνος if this should come to the prefect’s ears Mt 28:14.ⓒ ἀ. τι περί τινος (since Hdt. 2, 43) learn someth. about someone Lk 9:9; 16:2.—ἀ. περί τινος (Jos., Vi. 246) Lk 7:3.ⓓ w. prep., to denote the author or source of the information (s. 1bβ) ἀ. τι παρά τινος: τῶν ἀκουσάντων παρὰ Ἰωάννου who had learned fr. John (who Jesus was) J 1:40, cp. 6:45 (Simplicius in Epict. p. 110, 35 τὸ ἀκοῦσαι παρὰ θεοῦ, ὅτι ἀθάνατός ἐστιν ἡ ψυχή); ἀ. τι ἔκ τινος: ἠκούσαμεν ἐκ τοῦ νόμου we have heard from the law (when it was read in the synagogue) J 12:34, where ἀ. approaches the technical sense learn (a body of authoritative teaching), as 1J 1:5 (s. above); 2:7, 24 et al. (OPiper, JBL 66, ’47, 437 n. 1). ἀ. ἀπό τινος περί τινος Ac 9:13.ⓔ w. ὅτι foll. (SIG 370, 21; PTebt 416, 8; BGU 246, 19; Josh l0:1; Da 5:14 Theod.; 1 Macc 6:55; 4 Macc 4:22; cp. the constr. ἀ. τινὰ ὅτι Od. 3, 193; X., Mem. 4, 2, 33) Mt 2:22; 4:12 al.—Pass. ἠκούσθη ὅτι ἐν οἴκῳ ἐστίν it became known that he was in the house Mk 2:1 (s. B-D-F §405, 2). οὐκ ἠκούσθη ὅτι it is unheard of that J 9:32.ⓕ w. acc. and inf. foll. (Hom. et al.; Jos., Ant. 11, 165; 13, 292) J 12:18; 1 Cor 11:18. W. acc. and ptc. (X., Cyr. 2, 4, 12; Herodian 2, 12, 4) Ac 7:12; 3J 4.④ to give careful attention to, listen to, heed ἀ. τινός someone (Hom. et al.) ἀκούετε αὐτοῦ Mt 17:5; Lk 9:35; Ac 3:22 (all three Dt 18:15); cp. Mt 18:15; Lk 16:29, 31; J 10:8; Ac 4:19. W. acc. of thing J 8:47 (s. 1bα); PEg2 53f (restored).—Abs. (PsSol 2:8) obey, listen αὐτοὶ καὶ ἀκούσονται Ac 28:28; cp. Mt 18:16; J 5:25b; agree 9:27a.⑤ to pay attention to by listening, listen to ἀ. τινός someone/someth. (Mitt-Wilck. I/2, 14 I, 18; 461, 6) Mk 6:11; J 6:60b. Of God (Hom.+) Ac 7:34 (Ex 3:7); J 9:31; 11:41f; 1J 5:14f; AcPt Ox 849, 27.—Abs. καθὼς ἠδύναντο ἀ. as they were able to listen Mk 4:33 (EMolland, SymbOsl 8, 1929, 83–91; s. also 7 below).⑥ to be given a nickname or other identifying label, be called (Demosth. 18, 46 κόλακες ἀκούουσι; Diog. L. 2, 111 a derisive nickname; 2, 140) ἤκουσαν προδόται γονέων they were called betrayers of their parents Hv 2, 2, 2.⑦ to hear and understand a message, understand (Teles p. 47, 12; Galen: CMG Suppl. I p. 12, 29; Aelian, VH 13, 46; Apollon. Dysc., Syntax p. 295, 25 [Gramm. Gr. II/2 p. 424, 5 U.] ἀκούειν= συνιέναι τῶν ἠκουσμένων; Sext. Emp., Math. 1, 37 τὸ μὴ πάντας πάντων ἀκούειν; Julian, Orat. 4 p. 147a; PGM 3, 453 ἀκούσεις τὰ ὄρνεα λαλοῦντα; Philo, Leg. All. 2, 35) abs. (Is 36:11) 1 Cor 14:2. Perh. also Mk 4:33 (s. 5 above, and cp. Epict. 1, 29, 66 τ. δυναμένοις αὐτὰ ἀκοῦσαι). On the form of Lk 6:27a cp. Cleopatra 16, 57 ὑμῖν δὲ λέγω τοῖς εὖ φρονοῦσιν. W. acc. τὸν νόμον understand the law Gal 4:21; perh. Ac 22:9; 26:14 (s. 1bα above) belong here. Cp. also the play on words (1a above) ἀκούοντες οὐκ ἀκούουσιν Mt 13:13; cp. Mk 8:18. Here belong also the imperatives in Mt 11:15; 13:9, 43; Mk 4:9, 23; 7:15 [16] v.l.; Lk 8:8; 14:35; Rv 2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22; 13:9; also ὁ ἔχων ὦ[τ]α τ[ῶν ἀ]|περάντων [ἀ]κο[ύει?]ν ἀ|κουέτω one who has ears to hear the things that are without limits let him hear Ox 1081, 6–8, rev. on the basis of the Coptic, s. SJCh 89, 5f; cp. Borger, GGA 122.—ἀκούω is occasionally used as a perfective present: I hear= I have heard (so as early as Il. 24, 543; Aristoph., Frogs 426; X., An. 2, 5, 13, Mem. 2, 4, 1; 3, 5, 26; Pla., Rep. 583d; Theocr. 15, 23) Lk 9:9; 1 Cor 11:18; 2 Th 3:11. B-D-F §322.—B. 1037; 1339. DELG. M-M. TW. Sv. -
122 Philosophy
And what I believe to be more important here is that I find in myself an infinity of ideas of certain things which cannot be assumed to be pure nothingness, even though they may have perhaps no existence outside of my thought. These things are not figments of my imagination, even though it is within my power to think of them or not to think of them; on the contrary, they have their own true and immutable natures. Thus, for example, when I imagine a triangle, even though there may perhaps be no such figure anywhere in the world outside of my thought, nor ever have been, nevertheless the figure cannot help having a certain determinate nature... or essence, which is immutable and eternal, which I have not invented and which does not in any way depend upon my mind. (Descartes, 1951, p. 61)Let us console ourselves for not knowing the possible connections between a spider and the rings of Saturn, and continue to examine what is within our reach. (Voltaire, 1961, p. 144)As modern physics started with the Newtonian revolution, so modern philosophy starts with what one might call the Cartesian Catastrophe. The catastrophe consisted in the splitting up of the world into the realms of matter and mind, and the identification of "mind" with conscious thinking. The result of this identification was the shallow rationalism of l'esprit Cartesien, and an impoverishment of psychology which it took three centuries to remedy even in part. (Koestler, 1964, p. 148)It has been made of late a reproach against natural philosophy that it has struck out on a path of its own, and has separated itself more and more widely from the other sciences which are united by common philological and historical studies. The opposition has, in fact, been long apparent, and seems to me to have grown up mainly under the influence of the Hegelian philosophy, or, at any rate, to have been brought out into more distinct relief by that philosophy.... The sole object of Kant's "Critical Philosophy" was to test the sources and the authority of our knowledge, and to fix a definite scope and standard for the researches of philosophy, as compared with other sciences.... [But Hegel's] "Philosophy of Identity" was bolder. It started with the hypothesis that not only spiritual phenomena, but even the actual world-nature, that is, and man-were the result of an act of thought on the part of a creative mind, similar, it was supposed, in kind to the human mind.... The philosophers accused the scientific men of narrowness; the scientific men retorted that the philosophers were crazy. And so it came about that men of science began to lay some stress on the banishment of all philosophic influences from their work; while some of them, including men of the greatest acuteness, went so far as to condemn philosophy altogether, not merely as useless, but as mischievous dreaming. Thus, it must be confessed, not only were the illegitimate pretensions of the Hegelian system to subordinate to itself all other studies rejected, but no regard was paid to the rightful claims of philosophy, that is, the criticism of the sources of cognition, and the definition of the functions of the intellect. (Helmholz, quoted in Dampier, 1966, pp. 291-292)Philosophy remains true to its classical tradition by renouncing it. (Habermas, 1972, p. 317)I have not attempted... to put forward any grand view of the nature of philosophy; nor do I have any such grand view to put forth if I would. It will be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the history of "howlers" and progress in philosophy as the debunking of howlers. It will also be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the enterprise of putting forward a priori truths about the world.... I see philosophy as a field which has certain central questions, for example, the relation between thought and reality.... It seems obvious that in dealing with these questions philosophers have formulated rival research programs, that they have put forward general hypotheses, and that philosophers within each major research program have modified their hypotheses by trial and error, even if they sometimes refuse to admit that that is what they are doing. To that extent philosophy is a "science." To argue about whether philosophy is a science in any more serious sense seems to me to be hardly a useful occupation.... It does not seem to me important to decide whether science is philosophy or philosophy is science as long as one has a conception of both that makes both essential to a responsible view of the world and of man's place in it. (Putnam, 1975, p. xvii)What can philosophy contribute to solving the problem of the relation [of] mind to body? Twenty years ago, many English-speaking philosophers would have answered: "Nothing beyond an analysis of the various mental concepts." If we seek knowledge of things, they thought, it is to science that we must turn. Philosophy can only cast light upon our concepts of those things.This retreat from things to concepts was not undertaken lightly. Ever since the seventeenth century, the great intellectual fact of our culture has been the incredible expansion of knowledge both in the natural and in the rational sciences (mathematics, logic).The success of science created a crisis in philosophy. What was there for philosophy to do? Hume had already perceived the problem in some degree, and so surely did Kant, but it was not until the twentieth century, with the Vienna Circle and with Wittgenstein, that the difficulty began to weigh heavily. Wittgenstein took the view that philosophy could do no more than strive to undo the intellectual knots it itself had tied, so achieving intellectual release, and even a certain illumination, but no knowledge. A little later, and more optimistically, Ryle saw a positive, if reduced role, for philosophy in mapping the "logical geography" of our concepts: how they stood to each other and how they were to be analyzed....Since that time, however, philosophers in the "analytic" tradition have swung back from Wittgensteinian and even Rylean pessimism to a more traditional conception of the proper role and tasks of philosophy. Many analytic philosophers now would accept the view that the central task of philosophy is to give an account, or at least play a part in giving an account, of the most general nature of things and of man. (Armstrong, 1990, pp. 37-38)8) Philosophy's Evolving Engagement with Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive ScienceIn the beginning, the nature of philosophy's engagement with artificial intelligence and cognitive science was clear enough. The new sciences of the mind were to provide the long-awaited vindication of the most potent dreams of naturalism and materialism. Mind would at last be located firmly within the natural order. We would see in detail how the most perplexing features of the mental realm could be supported by the operations of solely physical laws upon solely physical stuff. Mental causation (the power of, e.g., a belief to cause an action) would emerge as just another species of physical causation. Reasoning would be understood as a kind of automated theorem proving. And the key to both was to be the depiction of the brain as the implementation of multiple higher level programs whose task was to manipulate and transform symbols or representations: inner items with one foot in the physical (they were realized as brain states) and one in the mental (they were bearers of contents, and their physical gymnastics were cleverly designed to respect semantic relationships such as truth preservation). (A. Clark, 1996, p. 1)Socrates of Athens famously declared that "the unexamined life is not worth living," and his motto aptly explains the impulse to philosophize. Taking nothing for granted, philosophy probes and questions the fundamental presuppositions of every area of human inquiry.... [P]art of the job of the philosopher is to keep at a certain critical distance from current doctrines, whether in the sciences or the arts, and to examine instead how the various elements in our world-view clash, or fit together. Some philosophers have tried to incorporate the results of these inquiries into a grand synoptic view of the nature of reality and our human relationship to it. Others have mistrusted system-building, and seen their primary role as one of clarifications, or the removal of obstacles along the road to truth. But all have shared the Socratic vision of using the human intellect to challenge comfortable preconceptions, insisting that every aspect of human theory and practice be subjected to continuing critical scrutiny....Philosophy is, of course, part of a continuing tradition, and there is much to be gained from seeing how that tradition originated and developed. But the principal object of studying the materials in this book is not to pay homage to past genius, but to enrich one's understanding of central problems that are as pressing today as they have always been-problems about knowledge, truth and reality, the nature of the mind, the basis of right action, and the best way to live. These questions help to mark out the territory of philosophy as an academic discipline, but in a wider sense they define the human predicament itself; they will surely continue to be with us for as long as humanity endures. (Cottingham, 1996, pp. xxi-xxii)10) The Distinction between Dionysian Man and Apollonian Man, between Art and Creativity and Reason and Self- ControlIn his study of ancient Greek culture, The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche drew what would become a famous distinction, between the Dionysian spirit, the untamed spirit of art and creativity, and the Apollonian, that of reason and self-control. The story of Greek civilization, and all civilizations, Nietzsche implied, was the gradual victory of Apollonian man, with his desire for control over nature and himself, over Dionysian man, who survives only in myth, poetry, music, and drama. Socrates and Plato had attacked the illusions of art as unreal, and had overturned the delicate cultural balance by valuing only man's critical, rational, and controlling consciousness while denigrating his vital life instincts as irrational and base. The result of this division is "Alexandrian man," the civilized and accomplished Greek citizen of the later ancient world, who is "equipped with the greatest forces of knowledge" but in whom the wellsprings of creativity have dried up. (Herman, 1997, pp. 95-96)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Philosophy
-
123 уже
I уж`е нареч. already;
as early as;
as early as;
(в настоящее время) by this time, by now;
(теперь) now;
(в отрицании) no longer уже двенадцать часов ≈ it is already twelve o'clock он уже кончил работу ≈ he has already finished his work это давно уже забыто ≈ it has long since been forgotten, it was forgotten long ago он давно уже ходит в школу ≈ he has been going to school for a long time now его уже нет там ≈ he is no longer there он уже не ребенок ≈ he is no longer a child он уже взрослый ≈ he is grown-up now его уже нет (в живых) ≈ he is no more уже давно уже не раз это уже хорошо ≈ anyway that's something II `уже сравн. от узкий, узко
2.
1. нареч. (указывает на окончание действия) не переводится ;
я ~ пообедал I`ve had (my) dinner;
вы ~ обедали? have you had dinner?;
когда мы пришли, он ~ уехал he had gone when we arrived;
2. нареч. (при словах, обозначающих отрезок времени) quite, very;
он ~ минуты три говорил he had been speaking for quite three minutes;
он ~ давно живёт в Москве he has been living in Moscow a very long time;
3. нареч. (указывает на более ранний срок наступления чего-л. ожидаемого) already, by, even;
~ в конце февраля by the end of February;
~ в 1960 году already in 1960;
~ теперь even now;
already;
4. усил. частица не переводится ;
~ пора ехать, начинать и т. д. (it`s) time to go, begin, etc. ;
он ~ давно кончил работу he finished the job long ago;
~ не раз again and again, more than once. -
124 -nomics
http:www.worldwidewords.org/topicalwords/tw-nom1.htmPoor old Thomas Carlyle, permanently and irretrievably burdened with having described economics as “the dismal science”. He was really talking about political economy, at the time a slightly different beast. But whatever one’s view of economics (I failed the only exam I ever took in the subject, so may be considered biased), lexicographically speaking it has been a fruitful term.These opaque musings were prompted by what journalists have started to call Enronomics, in reference to the accounting practices of the failed US corporation Enron and their implications for the Bush administration. It’s not as popular yet as Enrongate for the same imbroglio, but shows slight signs of fashionableness, having appeared in several US newspapers recently, and having even made it across the Atlantic to a British Sunday newspaper within hours. However, its chances of taking a permanent place in the language seem vanishingly small.Before we tar journalists too heavily with the brush of knee-jerk word invention for the sake of novelty, in fairness it has to be said that people have been borrowing that ending for at least 150 years. Agronomics, for example, was coined in the 1860s as a term for what is now often called agronomy, and ergonomics was invented about 1950.The Greek original of economics splits nicely in two to make -nomics, since its source was oikos, house, plus nemein, to manage (so economics literally means “household management”, which really brings it back to earth, or at least to home and hearth).But its move into the overtly political arena really dates from late 1969, when Nixonomics was invented as an umbrella term for the economic policies of President Richard Milhous Nixon. But the word which settled its popularity—Reaganomics—arrived in the early eighties; it was followed in the early nineties by Clintonomics. In the eighties, Britain briefly had Thatchernomics, though it was never very popular; New Zealand’s former Minister of Finance, Roger Douglas, provoked Rogernomics (a rare case of a politician’s first name rather than family name being borrowed). Other British politicians have had it applied to them in a half-hearted and short-lived way (Majornomics, Haguenomics) and Americans may remember Dolenomics from 1996.These examples settled the ending firmly into the grab-bags of topical writers. A sign of its acceptance is that it now pops up from time to time attached to words other than politicians’ names. Back in 1996, a report by Kleinwort Benson described the policies of Malaysia as Noddynomics, which greatly displeased that country’s government. Burgernomics has been applied to the global economic policies and impact of certain fast-food firms. Cybernomics has been used for the economic implications of the digital economy. And so on.So we ought not to be surprised that Enronomics has popped up, though it is unusual in being attached to the name of a corporation. -
125 Р-176
ЗАТЫКАТЬ/ЗАТКНУТЬ (ЗАКРЫВАТЬ/ ЗАКРЫТЬ, ЗАЖИМАТЬ/ЗАЖАТЬ) РОТ кому highly coll VP subj: human to force s.o. to be silent, prevent s.o. from speaking or voicing his opinionX заткнул рот Y-y ' X shut Y upX shut (stopped) Y's mouth X gagged (silenced) Y X muzzled YX put a muzzle on Y. "А теперь если ты, скажем, ошибаешься, а я хочу тебя поправить, говорю тебе об этом словами, а ты меня не слушаешь, даже рот мне затыкаешь - так что мне делать? Палкой тебя по голове?» (Солженицын 3). "Let's say you make a mistake and I want to correct you. I speak to you about it, and you don't listen to me, you even shut me up. Well, what am I supposed to do? Beat you over the head?" (3a).Младший продавец, когда начали продавать мед из запасной бочки, видно, кое о чем догадался... Шал и ко никак не мог решить - заткнуть ему рот парой тридцаток или не стоит унижаться? (Искандер 4). The junior salesman must have caught on when they began selling honey from the reserved barrel...Shaliko could not decide: should he stop the man's mouth with a pair of thirty-ruble bills, or was it worth demeaning himself? (4a).Володя, чтобы не было недоразумений. Я разделяю линию партии. Будем держать свои взгляды при себе. Ни к чему бесполезные споры». - «У меня тем более нет желания дискутировать со сталинскими подголосками, -высокомерно ответил Володя, - но уж раз вы меня сюда (в ссылку) загнали, то рот не заткнёте» (Рыбаков 2). "Volodya, just so there won't be any misunderstandings, I want you to know that I accept the Party line. Let's keep our views to ourselves. No need to have pointless arguments." "I haven't the slightest desire to debate with Stalinist yes-men," Volodya had replied haughtily. "But since you put me here, don't try to gag me as well" (2a).Помню, как... вмешался Твардовский: «Дайте ей сказать, я хочу понять -что произошло что вы ей рот затыкаете?» (Ивинская 1). I remember that Tvardovski tried to intervene on my behalf: "Let her speak. I want to understand what happened. Why do you want to muzzle her?" (1a). -
126 С-290
С ПЕРВОГО СЛОВА (С ПЕРВЫХ СЛОВ) понять, объявить, заметить что и т. п. PrepP these forms only adv more often used with pfv verbs fixed WO(to realize, announce, notice etc sth.) immediately, from the moment one or s.o. begins speakingfrom one's ( s.o. %) (very) first wordsat s.o. first words right at the outset (of the conversation etc) the minute one ( s.o.) opens one's (his) mouth.Егорша с первых слов начал задирать нос... Он, видите ли, отпускник, а не просто там на побывку после сплава домой пришёл, и потому намерен отдыхать культурно, ибо его здоровье - это уже не его здоровье, а здоровье рабочего класса (Абрамов 1). From his very first words Egorsha started putting on airs.... You see, he was on official leave-not the same as mere time off at home after timber floating-and was therefore intending to relax in a civilized manner, since his health was not his health, but the health of the working class (1a)...Он заметил с первых же слов её, что она в каком-то сильном возбуждении, может быть очень в ней необычайном, — возбуждении, похожем почти даже на какой-то восторг (Достоевский 1)..Не noticed at her first words that she was in some great excitement, perhaps quite unusual for her-an excitement even almost resembling a sort of rapture (1a). -
127 доказывать
(= доказать, обосновать, показать, см. также проверять) prove, demonstrate, show, establish• В качестве более сложного примера мы докажем, что... - As a slightly harder example we prove that...• В общем случае можно доказать, что... - In general, it is possible to prove that...• В результате теперь достаточно лишь доказать, что... - Consequently it is enough to prove that...• Вдобавок можно доказать, что... - In fact it can be proved that...• Гильберт был первым, кто доказал, что... - Hilbert was the first to prove that...• Для того, чтобы доказать этот результат, мы должны, во-первых, вычислить... - In order to prove this result we must first calculate...• Докажем теперь обобщение теоремы 1. - We now prove a generalization of Theorem 1.• Полезность данной теории еще необходимо доказать. - The utility of this theory has yet to be demonstrated.• Иногда весьма трудно доказать, что... - It is sometimes quite difficult to prove that...• Исходя из этих сведений, легко доказать, что... - From these facts it is easy to prove that...• Итак, мы уже доказали, что... - We have thus proved that...• Мы все еще должны доказать, что... - We still must show that...• Мы докажем эту теорему при дополнительном предположении, что... - We prove this theorem subject to the extra assumption that...• Мы докажем, что... - We deduce that...• Мы доказали следующий результат. - We have proved the following result.• Мы можем доказать правильность соотношения (6), заметив, что... - We can prove the correctness of (6) by observing that...• Мы можем доказать это без (особого) труда. - We can prove this without difficulty.• Мы надеемся доказать гипотезу Смита в ближайшие годы. - We hope to prove Smith's conjecture within a few years.• Мы надеемся доказать, что... - We hope to prove that...• Мы надеемся удалить эти ограничения и доказать более общий результат. - We hope to remove these restrictions and prove a more general result.• Мы надеемся, что кто-нибудь докажет гипотезу Смита в ближайшие годы. - We hope that someone will prove Smith's conjecture within the next few years.• Мы не будем доказывать здесь чрезвычайно правдоподобное утверждение, что... - We will not prove here the very reasonable statement that...• Мы не предлагаем доказывать существование... - We do not propose to prove the existence of...• Мы только что доказали, что... - We have just proved that...• На этом пути мы надеемся доказать существенный результат. - We hope to prove a significant result along these lines.• Наконец, мы можем доказать, что... - Finally, we can prove that...• Остается доказать, (что)... - It remains to show (that)...• Подобное рассуждение доказало бы, что... - A similar argument would prove that...• Подобные принципы доказали свою полезность при проектировании... - Similar principles prove helpful in the design of...• Подобные рассуждения доказывают следующий результат. - Arguments of the same type prove the following result.• Подобные результаты убедительно доказывают, что... - Such results conclusively prove that...• Поняв это, мы можем доказать следующее. - With this understanding, we can prove the following.• Следовательно, можно доказать, что... -It is therefore justifiable to...• Следовательно, мы должны доказать лишь, что... - Hence we have only to prove that...• Сначала мы обязаны доказать следующую теорему. - We must first prove the following theorem.• Строго говоря, мы доказали лишь, что... - Strictly speaking, we have only proved that...;• Тем лее способом мы доказываем, что... - In the same way we prove that...• Теперь мы доказываем важную теорему, принадлежащую Банаху. - We now prove an important theorem due to Banach.• Теперь мы доказываем два фундаментальных результата. - We now prove two fundamental results.• Теперь мы доказываем один фундаментальный результат. - We now prove a fundamental result.• Теперь мы можем доказать следующую теорему. - This result enables us to prove the following theorem; We are now able to prove the following theorem; With this result in hand, we can prove the following theorem; With this understanding, we can prove the following theorem; Knowing this, we can prove the following theorem; We can now prove the following theorem; We are now in a position to prove the following theorem; The following theorem is now within our reach; We are now ready for the following theorem.• Теперь мы можем сформулировать и доказать... - We are now in a position to state and prove...• Теперь мы подготовлены к тому, чтобы сформулировать и доказать... - We are now equipped to state and prove...• Теперь это предположение доказано, так как... - This assumption has now been justified, since...• Часто бывает проще доказать, что... - It is often easier to prove that...• Чтобы доказать обратное, достаточно заметить, что... - То prove the converse it is sufficient to notice that...• Чтобы доказать теорему, достаточно показать, что... - То prove the theorem it is sufficient to show that...• Чтобы доказать это следствие... - То see the corollary, use Proposition 1 to obtain the needed estimation.• Чтобы доказать это утверждение, мы сделаем упрощающее предположение, что... - То prove this statement, we make the simplifying assumption that...• Чтобы доказать эту теорему, во-первых, предположим, что... - То prove the theorem, suppose first that...• Чтобы доказать эту теорему, недостаточно увидеть, что... - То prove this theorem it is not enough to observe that...• Чтобы это доказать, нам остается лишь показать, что... - То prove this we need only show that...• Это доказывает лишь то, что... - This proves only that...• Это доказывает первое утверждение. - This proves the first assertion.• Это доказывает, что... - This proves that...• Это можно доказать следующим образом. - This may be proved as follows.• Этот подход доказал свою полезность в определении ранних стадий... - This approach has proven useful in identifying the early stages of...• что и требовалось доказать (= ч. т. д. ) - Q. E. D. -
128 определение
definition, determination, examination, identification, computation• (Нам) необходимы более точные определения, потому что... - More exact definitions are necessary because...• Вспомним некоторые определения. - Let us recall some definitions.• Давайте начнем с более тщательного определения того, что мы понимаем под... - Let us begin by defining more carefully what we mean by...• Дадим теперь более точное определение. - A more precise definition is as follows.• Данное определение применимо даже тогда, когда... - This definition is applicable even when...• Для наших целей подходит следующее достаточно грубое определение. - For our purposes the following rather rough definition is adequate.• Из определения очевидно, что... - It is evident from the definition that...• Из определения понятно, что It is plain from the definition that...• Из этих определений видно/понятно, что - It is clear from these definitions that...• Используя определения F и G, легко показать, что... - It is a simple matter, using the definitions of F and G, to show that...• Мы можем дать альтернативное определение... - It is possible to give an alternative definition of...• Мы можем дать неформальное определение, сказав, что... - We can express the definition informally by saying that...• Нам необходим критерий для определения, действительно ли... - We need a criterion for determining whether...• Нам необходимо одно определение. (= Мы нуждаемся в одном определении. ) - We need a definition.• Не существует систематического способа определения... - There is no systematic way of determining...• Однако, строго говоря, такое определение является бессмысленным, поскольку... - Strictly speaking, however, such a definition is meaningless because...• Определение констант будет дано в Приложении. - The determination of the constants will be given in Appendix.• Отметим отличие в определениях... и... - Let us contrast the definitions of... and...• Очень трудно, если вообще возможно, дать удовлетворительное определение... - It is difficult if not impossible to give a satisfactory definition of...• Перед тем как продолжить (изучение и т. п.), нам необходимо ввести еще одно определение. - We need one more definition before proceeding with...• Предыдущие определения являются прямыми обобщениями... - The above definitions are straightforward generalizations of...• С другой стороны, из определения F следует, что... - On the other hand, it follows from the definition of F that...• Следующая теорема показывает, как можно сделать это определение строгим. - The following theorem shows how this notion can be made precise.• Следующие примеры покажут важность данного определения. - Examples will bring out the significance of this definition.• Сначала нам необходимы несколько дополнительных определений. - A few more definitions are required first.• Существенный интерес представляет задача определения... - It is a problem of considerable interest to determine...• Существует простая геометрическая интерпретация этого определения. - There is a simple geometrical interpretation of this definition.• Существуют различные способы определения... - There are various ways of defining...• Теперь мы выведем простое правило для определения... - We now derive a simple rule for determining...• Теперь мы готовы ввести основное определение. - We are now ready for a basic definition.• Теперь мы собрали воедино основные определения и результаты (теории и т. п.)... - - We have now assembled the main definitions and results of...• Ценность этого определения, безусловно, заключается в его полезности. - The merit of this definition lies, of course, in its usefulness.• Это вытекает непосредственно из определения оператора D/Dt. - This follows at once from the meaning of the operator D/Dt.• Это завершает определение (= нахождение)... - This completes the determination of...• Это не особо полезное определение, так как... - This is not a particularly useful definition, since...• Это прямое следствие определения. - It is an immediate consequence of the definition.• Это обычные (= стандартные) определения для... - These are the usual definitions for...• Это определение не влечет за собой, что... - This definition does not imply that...• Это определение неудовлетворительно по нескольким причинам. - This definition is unsatisfactory for several reasons.• Это определение основано на следующих соображениях. - This definition is based on the following considerations.• Это полезное определение, поскольку... - This is a useful definition because...• Это придает смысл определению (= введению)... - This gives a means of defining...• Этот подход доказал свою полезность в определении ранних стадий... - This approach has proven useful in identifying the early stages of...
Страницы
См. также в других словарях:
speaking demurrer — An attempt to introduce new evidence during a hearing on a demurrer. Because a demurrer is an argument that assumes all of the facts in the challenged pleading are correct, evidence outside of the pleading may not be considered, and speaking… … Law dictionary
Speaking of Research — (SR) is a US based group which actively supports the use of animals in biomedical research. It was founded in March, 2008 by Tom Holder [ [http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS184569+28 Mar 2008+PRN20080328 Reuters: Speaking of… … Wikipedia
Speaking clock — A speaking clock service is used by people who wish to know the correct and accurate time. Speaking clock services are most commonly accessed by telephone.The format of the service is somewhat similar to those in radio time signal services. Every … Wikipedia
since — 1 conjunction (used with the present perfect and the past perfect tenses) 1 at a time after a particular time or event in the past: In the 12 months since I last wrote to you a lot has happened to me. | I can t have seen him since 1983. | It s… … Longman dictionary of contemporary English
Speaking tube — A speaking tube or voicepipe is a device based around two cones connected by an air pipe through which speech can be transmitted over an extended distance. While its most common use was in intra ship communications, the principle was also used in … Wikipedia
German-speaking electoral college — Infobox European Parliament constituency name = Infobox German speaking electoral college title = German speaking electoral college locationmap2007=yes lat=53.5 long=6.0 mapcaption = Shown within Belgium created = 1994 meps = 1 memberstate =… … Wikipedia
English-speaking Quebecer — Ethnic group group=English speaking Quebecer|100px] caption = James McGill · Sir John Abbott · Dr. Wilder Penfield · Doug Harvey · Oscar Peterson ·Brian Mulroney · The Arcade Fire poptime= Mother tongue: 575,555 (7.7%) [… … Wikipedia
Swedish-speaking Finns — More than 17,000 Swedish Finns live in officially monolingual Finnish municipalities, and are thus not represented on the map.Swedish speaking Finns (often called Finland Swedes, Finnish Swedes, Fennoswedes or Swedish Finns, see below) (Swedish:… … Wikipedia
Parliament of the German-speaking Community — Parlament der Deutschsprachigen Gemeinschaft Type Type Unicameral Leadership Speaker … Wikipedia
God is still speaking, — also known as The Stillspeaking Initiative , is the name of the identity, branding, and advertising campaign of the United Church of Christ that was launched in 2004.The Initiative was originally promulgated by the national office s Stillspeakin … Wikipedia
English-Speaking Union — The English Speaking Union is an international educational charity founded by journalist Evelyn Wrench in 1918. It aims to promote global understanding through the shared use of the English language. With almost 40 branches in the United Kingdom… … Wikipedia
