-
1 judicial precedent
-
2 judicial precedent
Jur. précédent judiciaireEnglish-French dictionary of law, politics, economics & finance > judicial precedent
-
3 judicial precedent
Юридический термин: судебный прецедент -
4 judicial precedent
-
5 judicial\ precedent
-
6 judicial precedent
-
7 judicial precedent
судебный прецедентEnglish-Russian dictionary of technical terms > judicial precedent
-
8 judicial precedent
-
9 judicial precedent
நீதிமுறை முன்தீர்ப்பு -
10 judicial
судовий; суддівський; законний; узаконений; правовий; неупереджений; розсудливийjudicial assistance in criminal matters — юридична допомога в кримінальних питаннях (в т. ч. однієї країни іншій)
judicial control of administrative authorities — судовий контроль за рішеннями ( діями) адміністративних органів
- judicial actjudicial expression of the rule of law — правова норма в тлумаченні судової практики; правова норма, вироблена судовою практикою
- judicial action
- judicial activism
- judicial activity
- judicial activism
- judicial administration
- judicial admission
- judicial agency
- judicial appeal
- judicial appointment
- judicial approval
- judicial archaism
- judicial ascertainment
- judicial assembly
- judicial assistance
- judicial assistant
- judicial authorities
- judicial authority
- judicial autonomy
- judicial award
- judicial ballistics
- judicial bench
- judicial blindness
- judicial board
- judicial board for civil cases
- judicial body
- judicial branch
- judicial branch of government
- judicial bribery
- judicial capacity
- judicial career
- judicial case
- judicial choice
- judicial circuit
- judicial circumstances
- judicial citation
- judicial clerk
- judicial code
- judicial cognizance
- judicial colleague
- judicial collegiality
- judicial combat
- judicial comity
- judicial committee
- Judicial Committee Rules
- judicial concept
- judicial confession
- judicial consequences
- judicial conservative
- judicial construction
- judicial contest
- judicial control
- judicial corruption
- judicial council
- judicial courage
- judicial court
- judicial creativity
- judicial custody
- judicial day
- judicial decision
- judicial decision-making
- judicial definition
- judicial department
- judicial dictum
- judicial discretion
- judicial district
- judicial document
- judicial duties
- judicial duty
- judicial education
- judicial effectiveness
- judicial endorsement
- judicial enforcement
- judicial enquiry
- judicial error
- judicial establishment
- judicial evidence
- judicial examination
- judicial excess
- judicial execution
- judicial expert
- judicial expression
- judicial factor
- judicial field
- judicial function
- judicial functionary
- judicial functions
- judicial government
- judicial hierarchy
- judicial immunity
- judicial incumbent
- judicial independence
- judicial inquiry
- judicial inquisition
- judicial instance
- judicial interference
- judicial interpretation
- judicial investigation
- judicial investigation inquest
- judicial investigator
- judicial jurisdiction
- judicial knowledge
- judicial law
- judicial lawmaking
- judicial legislation
- judicial letter
- judicial level
- judicial machinery
- judicial manpower
- judicial matter
- judicial measure
- judicial misconduct
- judicial murder
- judicial nomination
- judicial notice
- judicial oath
- judicial office
- judicial officer
- judicial officials
- judicial opinion
- judicial order
- judicial organ
- judicial organization
- judicial performance
- judicial policy
- judicial post
- judicial power
- judicial practice
- judicial precedent
- judicial precept
- judicial prevention
- judicial privilege
- judicial procedure
- judicial proceeding
- judicial proceedings
- judicial process
- judicial protection
- judicial psychology
- judicial punishment
- judicial question
- judicial questioning
- judicial re-examination
- judicial recommendation
- judicial record
- judicial records
- judicial recourse
- judicial reform
- judicial relief
- judicial remedy
- judicial resolution
- judicial responsibility
- judicial restraint
- judicial review
- judicial review of legislation
- judicial rulemaker
- judicial salary
- judicial sale
- judicial scrutiny
- judicial security
- judicial selection
- judicial selection system
- judicial self-restraint
- judicial separation
- judicial sequestration
- judicial service
- judicial session
- judicial settlement
- judicial sitting
- judicial statistics
- judicial subpoena
- judicial superior
- judicial supervision
- judicial supremacy
- judicial system
- judicial tenure
- judicial term
- judicial training
- judicial trial
- judicial tribunal
- judicial trustee
- judicial vacation
- judicial vacations
- judicial work
- judicial workload
- judicial workloads
- judicial writ -
11 judicial
[dʒuː'dɪʃl]1) [inquiry, decision] giudiziariojudicial process — atto di procedura, citazione a comparire
to take judicial proceedings against sb. — intraprendere un'azione legale o un procedimento giudiziario contro qcn
3) (impartial) [ silence] imparziale* * *[‹u'diʃəl](of a judge or court of law: judicial powers; He might bring judicial proceedings against you.) giudiziario, giudiziale* * *judicial /dʒu:ˈdɪʃl/a.1 (leg.) giudiziale; giudiziario: judicial acts, atti giudiziali; judicial decision, decisione giudiziaria; judicial method, metodo giudiziale; judicial power, potere giudiziario2 (fig.) equo; imparziale● judicial activism, attivismo giudiziario □ judicial assembly, corte di giustizia □ the judicial bench, il banco del giudice □ judicial controversy, vertenza giudiziaria □ judicial enquiry (o inquiry), istruttoria; inchiesta giudiziaria □ judicial murder, assassinio legale; condanna a morte di un innocente □ (in GB) judicial precedent, precedente giudiziario □ judicial proceedings, procedimento giudiziario; azione legale □ judicial record, dispositivo della sentenza □ judicial review, controllo giurisdizionale (o giudiziario); (in USA) controllo giurisdizionale ( da parte della Corte Suprema) della costituzionalità delle leggi □ judicial sale, vendita giudiziale (o giudiziaria) □ judicial separation, separazione legale □ judicial system, sistema giudiziariojudicially avv.* * *[dʒuː'dɪʃl]1) [inquiry, decision] giudiziariojudicial process — atto di procedura, citazione a comparire
to take judicial proceedings against sb. — intraprendere un'azione legale o un procedimento giudiziario contro qcn
3) (impartial) [ silence] imparziale -
12 judicial
1. a судебныйthe judicial bench — коллегия суда, судьи
2. a судейский3. a рассудительный, беспристрастный4. a критически настроенный, скептический, склонный осуждать5. a рел. ниспосланный за грехи; справедливыйСинонимический ряд:1. discriminating (adj.) analytical; critical; discriminating; forensic; judicious; juridical; magisterial; sententious2. judiciary (adj.) judiciary; juristic; legal; official -
13 precedent
[̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt]authoritative precedent авторитетный прецедент authoritative precedent заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding precedent обязывающий прецедент precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие condition precedent предварительное условие declaratory precedent деклараторный прецедент judicial precedent судебный прецедент original precedent первичный прецедент persuasive precedent юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный precedent предшествующий; condition precedent предварительное условие precedent предшествующий precedent прецедент precedent судебный прецедент -
14 precedent
1) прецедент2) предшествующий; предварительный•- applied precedentprecedent (exactly) applicable to the act [to the fact] — прецедент, (полностью) применимый к деянию [факту];
- binding precedent
- governing precedent
- judicial precedent
- leading precedent
- ruling precedent
- solid precedent
- sound precedent* * * -
15 precedent
1. n2. aпредшествующий; предварительный -
16 precedent
1. прил.общ. предшествующий2. сущ.юр. прецедент (решение суда, служащее образцом при решении аналогичных дел в системе англосаксонского права; в системе английского права формулируется как решение высших судов, имеющее обязательную силу как для них самих, так и для низших судов; на практике это означает, что решения палаты лордов не могут игнорироваться нижестоящими судами; решения Апелляционного суда должны применяться в дальнейшем всеми судами, кроме палаты лордов; Высокий суд выносит решения, которые обязательны для все судов, кроме палаты лордов и Апелляционного суда; прецеденты публикуются в специальных сборниках, как правило, называющихся law reports; институты договорного права, ответственности за нарушение обязательств регулируются исключительно прецедентами)to constitute [create, establish\] a precedent — создавать прецедент
Syn:See:binding precedent, persuasive precedent, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom -
17 judicial
a. 사법(상)의, 재판소의, 판단력이 있는, 공평한, 비판적인, \judicial precedent 판례 -
18 precedent
̘. ̈n.ˈpresɪdənt
1. сущ. прецедент without precedent ≈ беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента there's no precedent for this ≈ это беспрецедентный случай to set/create/establish a precedent ≈ создать прецедент to invoke a precedent ≈ сослаться на прецедент
2. прил.
1) предшествующий, предыдущий precedent chapter ≈ предыдущая глава Syn: previous, former
2) превосходящий precedent in nobility ≈ превосходящий в знатности (судебный) прецедент - to set /to create/ a * создать прецедент - to invoke a * сослаться на прецедент - without * беспрецедентный, не имеющий прецедента, беспримерный, небывалый - there's no * for this это беспрецедентный случай предшествующий - * events предшествующие события - * chapter предшествующая глава - conditions * предварительные условия authoritative ~ авторитетный прецедент authoritative ~ заслуживающий доверия прецедент binding ~ обязывающий прецедент ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие condition ~ предварительное условие declaratory ~ деклараторный прецедент judicial ~ судебный прецедент original ~ первичный прецедент persuasive ~ юр. убедительный прецедент precedent предшествующий, предварительный ~ предшествующий;
condition precedent предварительное условие ~ предшествующий ~ прецедент ~ судебный прецедентБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > precedent
-
19 Judicial and Legal System
The 1976 Constitution and 1982 revisions provide for three fundamental courts, each with different functions, as well as other special courts, including a military court. The three principal courts are the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Justice, and Supreme Court of Administration. The Constitutional Court determines whether legislative acts (laws) are legal and constitutional. In addition, it ascertains the physical ability of the president of the Republic to perform duties of office, as well as to determine the constitutionality of international agreements. Ten of this court's members are selected by the Assembly of the Republic.The Supreme Court of Justice, the highest court of law, heads the court system and tries civil and criminal cases. It includes first courts to try cases and courts of appeal. The Supreme Court of Administration examines the administrative and fiscal conduct of government institutions. All matters concerning judges, including the power to discipline judges whose conduct does not comply with the law, are overseen by the Higher Council of the Bench and the Superior Council of the Administrative and Fiscal Courts. There is also an Ombudsman, elected for a four-year term by the Assembly of the Republic, who serves as chief civil and human rights officer of the country. This officer receives 3,000-4,000 complaints a year from citizens who dispute acts of the judicial and legal system.Portugal's system of laws is based on Roman civil law and has been shaped by the French legal system. Unlike common law in the American and British legal systems, Portugal's system of laws is based on a complete body of law so that judicial reason is deductive. Legal precedent, then, has little influence. Portuguese judges are viewed as civil servants simply applying the law from codes, not as a judiciary who interpret law. While the post-1974 judicial and legal system is freer and fairer than that under the Estado Novo dictatorship, it has received criticism on the grounds of being very slow, cumbersome, overburdened with cases, and sometimes corrupt. There has been a backlog of untried cases and long delays before trial because of vacant judgeships and inefficient operations.Under Portuguese criminal law, preventive detention for a maximum of four months is legal. Much longer preventive detention terms occur due to the trial backlog. Memories persist of legal abuses under the Estado Novo system, when suspects convicted of crimes against the state could be detained legally for periods of from six months to three years. Media sensationalism and the cited problems of the judicial system exacerbated tensions in recent high-profile trials, including the 2004-05 trial of a child prostitution and pedophile ring, tried in Lisbon, with suspects including a celebrated television personality and a former diplomat.Historical dictionary of Portugal > Judicial and Legal System
-
20 судебный прецедент
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > судебный прецедент
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
judicial precedent — index authority (documentation) Burton s Legal Thesaurus. William C. Burton. 2006 judicial precedent … Law dictionary
judicial precedent — noun The system whereby a court is bound to declare the law in accordance with previous rulings by equivalent or higher courts • • • Main Entry: ↑judicial … Useful english dictionary
judicial precedent — See precedent … Ballentine's law dictionary
Judicial activism — is a pejorative term for the misuse of judicial power and is a neologism for the older classical term board judicial review . The most common connotation is subjective, in which the speaker condemns judicial decisions that, in the view of the… … Wikipedia
judicial activism — judicial ac·ti·vism / ak tə ˌvi zəm/ n: the practice in the judiciary of protecting or expanding individual rights through decisions that depart from established precedent or are independent of or in opposition to supposed constitutional or… … Law dictionary
judicial activism — Judicial philosophy which motivates judges to depart from strict adherence to judicial precedent in favor of progressive and new social policies which are not always consistent with the restraint expected of appellate judges. It is commonly… … Black's law dictionary
judicial activism — Judicial philosophy which motivates judges to depart from strict adherence to judicial precedent in favor of progressive and new social policies which are not always consistent with the restraint expected of appellate judges. It is commonly… … Black's law dictionary
Precedent — In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. DescriptionThe precedent on an issue is … Wikipedia
precedent */ — UK [ˈpresɪdənt] / US noun Word forms precedent : singular precedent plural precedents 1) [countable/uncountable] an action or event in the past that is used as an example or reason for a present action or event precedent for: There are good… … English dictionary
precedent — prec|e|dent [ presıdənt ] noun * 1. ) count or uncount an action or event in the past that is used as an example or reason for a present action or event: precedent for: There are good precedents for this sort of cooperation between organizations … Usage of the words and phrases in modern English
Judicial philosophy — is the set of ideas and beliefs which dictate how Justices and judges of the United States federal courts may rule in many cases. There is a large academic debate over judicial philosophy, with some supporting the theory that justices can be… … Wikipedia