-
61 target
n. mål--------v. rikta mot ett mål* * *1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) måltavla2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) mål3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) -
62 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) terč2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) cíl3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) terč* * *• zaměřit• terč• cílový• cíl -
63 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) terč2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) cieľ3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) terč* * *• výmenné vodítko• zamerat• smerné císlo• strelba do terca• terc• jahnacia pecen• antikatóda• cielový• ciel• najvyšší výkon• nastrelovat• naplánovat ciel -
64 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) ţintă2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) ţintă3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) ţintă -
65 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) στόχος2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) στόχος3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) στόχος -
66 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) cible2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) cible3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) cible -
67 target
1) (a marked board or other object aimed at in shooting practice, competitions etc with a rifle, bow and arrow etc: His shots hit the target every time.) alvo2) (any object at which shots, bombs etc are directed: Their target was the royal palace.) alvo3) (a person, thing etc against which unfriendly comment or behaviour is directed: the target of criticism.) alvo -
68 carom
EN definition: Rebound of the hockey puck off the boards or any other object, causing it to change direction.RU definition: Отскок хоккейной шайбы от бортов или любого другого объекта, что приводит к изменению ее направления. -
69 antique
antique [ænˈti:k]1. adjective2. noun• it's a genuine antique c'est un objet (or un meuble) d'époque3. compounds* * *[æn'tiːk] 1.1) ( piece of furniture) meuble m ancien or d'époque; ( other object) objet m ancien or d'époque2) (colloq) péj ( person) vieux fossile m2.1) ( old) ancien/-ienne2) ( old-style) à l'ancienne -
70 icon
"A small picture that represents a file, folder, program, or other object or function." -
71 scanner
An optical input device that uses light-sensing equipment to capture an image on paper or some other object. Captured image data is converted into binary files that can be stored and manipulated by computer programs. -
72 input focus appearance
The visual display of a control or other object that indicates it has the input focus. -
73 Focused Ion Beam
A focused beam of gallium ions that can be used to image the surface of a PCB or other object. -
74 FIB
A focused beam of gallium ions that can be used to image the surface of a PCB or other object. -
75 resize handle
"A handle that enables resizing of a row, column, window or other object." -
76 deflection
- прогиб
- провес
- преломление (лучей)
- отскок (хоккей на льду)
- относительный прогиб
- отклонение стрелки
- отклонение (стрелки)
- деформация шины под нагрузкой
- деформация авиационного средства пакетирования
деформация авиационного средства пакетирования
Изменение формы авиационного средства пакетирования или элемента его конструкции в результате воздействия нагрузки.
[ ГОСТ Р 53428-2009]Тематики
EN
деформация шины под нагрузкой
деформация под нагрузкой
Разность между свободным и статическим радиусами шины.
[ ГОСТ 22374-77]Тематики
Обобщающие термины
Синонимы
EN
DE
FR
отклонение (стрелки)
склонение магнитной стрелки
деривация
—
[ http://slovarionline.ru/anglo_russkiy_slovar_neftegazovoy_promyishlennosti/]Тематики
Синонимы
EN
относительный прогиб
—
[ http://slovarionline.ru/anglo_russkiy_slovar_neftegazovoy_promyishlennosti/]Тематики
EN
отскок
рикошет
Отскок хоккейной шайбы от бортов или любого другого объекта, что приводит к изменению ее направления.
[Департамент лингвистических услуг Оргкомитета «Сочи 2014». Глоссарий терминов]EN
carom
Rebound of the hockey puck off the boards or any other object, causing it to change direction.
[Департамент лингвистических услуг Оргкомитета «Сочи 2014». Глоссарий терминов]Тематики
Синонимы
EN
преломление (лучей)
—
[ http://slovarionline.ru/anglo_russkiy_slovar_neftegazovoy_promyishlennosti/]Тематики
EN
провес
Вертикальное отклонение конструкций типа гибких нитей и мембран от уровня их опор под действием собственного веса и нагрузки
[Терминологический словарь по строительству на 12 языках (ВНИИИС Госстроя СССР)]EN
DE
FR
прогиб
Вертикальное перемещение точки, лежащей на оси строительных конструкций, таких как балка, арка, рама и т.п., под действием силовых, температурных и других факторов
[Терминологический словарь по строительству на 12 языках (ВНИИИС Госстроя СССР)]Тематики
- строительная механика, сопротивление материалов
EN
DE
FR
3.3 прогиб (deflection) X: Вертикальный прогиб образца в середине пролета под действием силы FХ, измеренный в точке приложения силы.
3.3 прогиб (deflection) X: Вертикальный прогиб образца в середине пролета под действием силы Fx, измеренный в точке приложения силы.
Англо-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > deflection
-
77 tool
- инструмент (в информационыых технологиях)
- инструмент
- защита от доступа к опасным частям инструментом
защита от доступа к опасным частям инструментом
Щуп доступности диаметром 2,5 мм не должен проникать внутрь оболочки
[ ГОСТ 14254-96( МЭК 529-89)]
защита от доступа к опасным частям инструментом
-
[Интент]Тематики
EN
инструмент
Отвертка, монета или любой другой предмет, который можно использовать, чтобы привести в действие винт или подобные крепежные средства.
[ ГОСТ Р 52161. 1-2004 ( МЭК 60335-1: 2001)]
инструмент
Предмет, не входящий в состав оборудования (в том числе ключи и плоскогубцы), используемый персоналом при проведении механических работ.
[ ГОСТ Р 52319-2005( МЭК 61010-1: 2001)]
инструмент
Технологическая оснастка, предназначенная для воздействия на предмет труда с целью изменения его состояния.
Примечание
Состояние предмета труда определяется при помощи меры и (или) измерительного прибора
[ГОСТ 3.1109-82]EN
tool
screwdriver, coin or any other object that may be used to operate a screw or similar fixing means
[IEC 60335-1, ed. 4.0 (2001-05)]FR
outil
tournevis, pièce de monnaie ou autre objet quelconque pouvant être utilisé pour manœuvrer une vis ou un dispositif de fixation similaire
[IEC 60335-1, ed. 4.0 (2001-05)]Тематики
Обобщающие термины
EN
DE
FR
инструмент
Функция в графическом интерфейсе, отображаемая в виде значка в панели инструментов.
[ http://www.morepc.ru/dict/]Тематики
EN
1.2.7.4 инструмент (tool): Отвертка или любой другой предмет, который может быть использован для воздействия на винт, защелку или другое фиксирующее устройство.
Источник: ГОСТ Р МЭК 60950-1-2009: Оборудование информационных технологий. Требования безопасности. Часть 1. Общие требования оригинал документа
1.2.7.4 инструмент (tool): Отвертка или любой другой предмет, который может быть использован для воздействия на винт, защелку или другое фиксирующее устройство.
Источник: ГОСТ Р МЭК 60950-1-2005: Оборудование информационных технологий. Требования безопасности. Часть 1. Общие требования оригинал документа
3.6.5 инструмент (tool): Отвертка, монета или любой другой предмет, который можно использовать, чтобы привести в действие винт или подобные крепежные средства.
Источник: ГОСТ Р 52161.1-2004: Безопасность бытовых и аналогичных электрических приборов. Часть 1. Общие требования оригинал документа
1.2.85 инструмент (tool): Отвертка, монета или другой предмет, который можно использовать для завинчивания винтов или других крепежных средств.
Источник: ГОСТ Р МЭК 60598-1-2011: Светильники. Часть 1. Общие требования и методы испытаний оригинал документа
3.1.7 ИНСТРУМЕНТ (TOOL): Любое устройство (отвертка, ключ или монета), помогающее человеку выполнить механическое действие.
3.2.4 инструмент (tool): Сложный инструмент, как определено в ЕН 847-1, каким является ножевой вал (см. также примечание к 3.2.1).
Источник: ГОСТ Р ЕН 860-2010: Безопасность деревообрабатывающих станков. Станки рейсмусовые односторонние
96. Инструмент
D. Werkzeug
E. Tool
Источник: ГОСТ 3.1109-82: Единая система технологической документации. Термины и определения основных понятий оригинал документа
Англо-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > tool
-
78 carom
отскок
рикошет
Отскок хоккейной шайбы от бортов или любого другого объекта, что приводит к изменению ее направления.
[Департамент лингвистических услуг Оргкомитета «Сочи 2014». Глоссарий терминов]EN
carom
Rebound of the hockey puck off the boards or any other object, causing it to change direction.
[Департамент лингвистических услуг Оргкомитета «Сочи 2014». Глоссарий терминов]Тематики
Синонимы
EN
Англо-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > carom
-
79 HIM
[ forma debole ɪm] [ forma forte hɪm]1) (direct object) lo, lui2) (indirect object) gli, a lui3) (after preposition) lui4) colloq.••Note:Him can be translated in Italian by lo, gli and lui. - When used as a direct object pronoun, him is translated by lo (l' before h or a vowel). Note that the object pronoun normally comes before the verb in Italian: I know him = lo conosco; I've already seen him = l'ho già visto. In imperatives (and other non-finite forms), however, lo comes after the verb and is joined to it to form a single word: catch him! = prendilo! When the direct object pronoun is used in emphasis, him is translated by lui which comes after the verb: she loves him, not you = lei ama lui, non te. - When used as an indirect object pronoun, him is translated by gli, which comes before the verb: I've given him the book = gli ho dato il libro. In imperatives (and other non-finite forms), however, gli comes after the verb and is joined to it to form a single word: phone him! = telefonagli! Note that gli becomes glie when another pronoun is used as well: send it to him at once! = mandaglielo subito! we've given it to him = glielo abbiamo dato. - After prepositions, the translation is lui: I did it for him = l'ho fatto per lui; I told him, not her = l'ho detto a lui, non a lei. - Remember that a verb followed by a particle or a preposition in English may correspond to a verb followed by a direct object in Italian, and vice versa, e.g. to look at somebody vs guardare qualcuno and to distrust somebody vs dubitare di qualcuno: look at him! = guardalo! they distrust him = dubitano di lui. - When him is used after as or than in comparative clauses, it is translated by lui: you're as strong as him = tu sei forte come lui; she's younger than him = lei è più giovane di lui. - For particular expressions see below* * *HIMsigla* * *[ forma debole ɪm] [ forma forte hɪm]1) (direct object) lo, lui2) (indirect object) gli, a lui3) (after preposition) lui4) colloq.••Note:Him can be translated in Italian by lo, gli and lui. - When used as a direct object pronoun, him is translated by lo (l' before h or a vowel). Note that the object pronoun normally comes before the verb in Italian: I know him = lo conosco; I've already seen him = l'ho già visto. In imperatives (and other non-finite forms), however, lo comes after the verb and is joined to it to form a single word: catch him! = prendilo! When the direct object pronoun is used in emphasis, him is translated by lui which comes after the verb: she loves him, not you = lei ama lui, non te. - When used as an indirect object pronoun, him is translated by gli, which comes before the verb: I've given him the book = gli ho dato il libro. In imperatives (and other non-finite forms), however, gli comes after the verb and is joined to it to form a single word: phone him! = telefonagli! Note that gli becomes glie when another pronoun is used as well: send it to him at once! = mandaglielo subito! we've given it to him = glielo abbiamo dato. - After prepositions, the translation is lui: I did it for him = l'ho fatto per lui; I told him, not her = l'ho detto a lui, non a lei. - Remember that a verb followed by a particle or a preposition in English may correspond to a verb followed by a direct object in Italian, and vice versa, e.g. to look at somebody vs guardare qualcuno and to distrust somebody vs dubitare di qualcuno: look at him! = guardalo! they distrust him = dubitano di lui. - When him is used after as or than in comparative clauses, it is translated by lui: you're as strong as him = tu sei forte come lui; she's younger than him = lei è più giovane di lui. - For particular expressions see below -
80 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
См. также в других словарях:
Object-oriented ontology — (OOO) is a metaphysical movement that rejects the privileging of human existence over the existence of nonhuman objects.[1] Specifically, object oriented ontology opposes the anthropocentrism of Immanuel Kant s Copernican Revolution, whereby… … Wikipedia
Object Pascal — Paradigm(s) imperative, structured, object oriented, functional (Delphi dialect only) Appeared in 1986 (1986) Designed by Apple, Niklaus Wirth, Anders Hejlsberg … Wikipedia
Object manipulation — is a form of dexterity play or performance in which one or more artists physically interact with one or more objects. These can be special props made for the purpose of the manipulation itself such as balls, clubs, hoops, rings, poi, staff, devil … Wikipedia
Object-Z — is an object oriented extension to the Z notation developed at the University of Queensland, Australia. Object Z extends Z by the addition of language constructs resembling the object oriented paradigm, most notably, classes. Other object… … Wikipedia
Object Lisp — was a computer programming language, a dialect of the Lisp language. It was an object oriented extension for the Lisp dialect Lisp Machine Lisp, designed by Lisp Machines, Inc. Object Lisp was also an early example of prototype based programming … Wikipedia
Object-oriented design — OOD redirects here. OOD may also refer to Officer of the Deck, Officer of the day, or the Ood. Object oriented design is the process of planning a system of interacting objects for the purpose of solving a software problem. It is one approach to… … Wikipedia
Object Linking and Embedding — (OLE) is a technology developed by Microsoft that allows embedding and linking to documents and other objects. For developers, it brought OLE Control eXtension (OCX), a way to develop and use custom user interface elements. On a technical level,… … Wikipedia
Object Desktop — ObjectBar used with DesktopX to create a theme Developer(s) Stardock … Wikipedia
Object Manager (Windows) — Object Manager in Windows, categorized hierarchically using namespaces Object Manager (internally called Ob) is a subsystem implemented as part of the Windows Executive which manages Windows resources. Each resource, which are surfaced as logical … Wikipedia
Object-oriented analysis and design — (OOAD) is a software engineering approach that models a system as a group of interacting objects. Each object represents some entity of interest in the system being modeled, and is characterised by its class, its state (data elements), and its… … Wikipedia
Object Management Group — Formation 1989 Headquarters Needham, Massachusetts Website … Wikipedia