-
1 scientific view of the world
Дипломатический термин: научное мировоззрениеУниверсальный англо-русский словарь > scientific view of the world
-
2 scientific view of the world
Politics english-russian dictionary > scientific view of the world
-
3 scientific view of the world
Англо-русский дипломатический словарь > scientific view of the world
-
4 scientific view of the world
English-russian dctionary of diplomacy > scientific view of the world
-
5 the scientific view of the world
Общая лексика: научное мировоззрениеУниверсальный англо-русский словарь > the scientific view of the world
-
6 view
1. nвзгляд, мнение, суждение; точка зренияto abandon one's view — отказываться от своего мнения
to acquaint oneself with the view of smb — знакомится с точкой зрения кого-л.
to be contrary to smb's views — противоречить чьим-л. взглядам
to be moderate in one's views — придерживаться умеренных взглядов
to be of the view — считать, полагать
to color smb's view of smth — характеризовать чью-л. точку зрения на...
to depart from one's views — отступать от своих взглядов
to endorse the view of smb — поддерживать чью-л. точку зрения
to enlarge on one's views — подробно излагать свои взгляды
to explore the views of smb — выяснять чьи-л. взгляды
to express the view — выражать мнение / точку зрения
to formulate / to give views on smth — формулировать / высказывать / излагать взгляды на что-л.
to go towards meeting smb's view — пойти навстречу чьему-л. мнению
to investigate smb's political views — расследовать чьи-л. политические взгляды
to present one's view — высказывать свое мнение
to present smb's point of view — представлять чью-л. точку зрения
to publicize one's views — рекламировать свои взгляды
to put forward views on smth — формулировать / высказывать / излагать взгляды на что-л.
to reassess one's view of smb — пересматривать свое мнение о ком-л.
to reflect views — отражать взгляды / точки зрения
to reinforce the widely held view that... — подтверждать широко распространенное мнение о том, что...
- aesthetic viewsto take a different view — придерживаться иного мнения / взгляда
- alien views
- backward views
- broad spectrum of views
- cautiously optimistic view
- clash of views
- community of views
- conflicting views
- consensus view
- conservative views
- constructive exchange of views
- controversial views
- critical view
- defeatist views
- delegations subscribing to the view in paragraph 1
- democratic views
- depressing view - dissenting view
- divergent views
- eclectic views
- erroneous views
- evolutionistic views - extreme views
- extremist views
- fallacy of a point of view
- healthy views
- heretical views
- idealistic views - independent view
- leftist views
- left-wing views
- liberal bourgeois views
- mainstream view
- mixed views
- nationalistic views
- old views
- opposing views
- opposite views
- optimistic view
- orthodox view
- pessimistic view
- philosophical views
- political views
- positivistic views
- predominant view
- progressive social views
- progressive views
- radical views
- reactionary views
- religions views
- retrospective view
- scientific view of the world
- scientific views
- sensible view
- sober view
- social view
- spirited defense of one's view
- strong political views
- tolerance of divergent political views
- traditional view
- unanimity of views
- unity of views
- view of things
- views on topical international problems 2. vобозревать; рассматривать; считатьto view smth in isolation from smth — рассматривать что-л. изолированно от чего-л.
-
7 view
1. n1) вид; вигляд; пейзаж; зображення; краєвид2) поле зору, кругозір, круговид; видимістьto be in view — бути видимим; передбачатися
we came in view of the bridge — ми побачили міст; нас стало видно з мосту
to the view — у всіх на виду, відкрито
to pass from smb.'s view — зникати з чиїхось очей
3) погляд, думка, точка зору; судженняin my view — на мій погляд, на мою думку
4) намір, мета; задум, планin view — з метою, з наміром
with the view of (to) — з наміром, з метою
5) огляд, переглядto have a view of — оглядати, обдивлятися
6) юр. огляд присяжними місця злочину7) аспект, сторона, вид8) резюме, огляд, висновок9) зовнішність, зовнішній виглядin view of — зважаючи на щось, через щось
with a view to preventing (to prevent) a catastrophe — щоб відвернути катастрофу
view day — попередній (закритий) перегляд (кінофільму, виставки тощо)
view slit — військ. оглядова щілина (в танку тощо)
2. v1) оглядати, обдивлятися; дивитисяto view the body — юр. зробити огляд трупа
2) поет. бачити, побачити3) розглядати; оцінювати; судити, мати судження4) дивитися (телевізор)* * *I [vjuː] n.1) вид, пейзаж, панорама; a room wіth a view of the mountaіns кімната з видом на гори2) вид, пейзаж, зображення (малюнок, картина, фотознімок); to do [to take] a view of smth. малювати [фотографувати] що-н.3) видимість, поле зору (тж. fіeld ofview); angle of view кут зору; out of view поза полем зору; out of human view недоступний людському оку; to the view відкрито, на очах, в усіх на очах; to rіse to view з’явитися, стати перед очима; to burst іnto /upon the/ view раптово з’явитися; to fade from view поступово зникнути, щезнути з очей; іn view на очах; у межах видимості [див. тж. 6]; to come іn view (of) побачити; потрапити в поле зору; he came іn view or the castle а) він побачив замок; його стало видно з замку; land іn view земля ( видно землю)!; he fell off the horse іn full view of hіs frіends він упав з коня на очах у друзів4) погляд, думка, судження; точка зору (тж. poіnt or view); exchange of view s обмін думками; іn my view по-моєму; на мій погляд; to state one’s views m /about/ smth. викласти /висловити/ свою думку /своє розуміння/ про що-н.; pl. погляди, переконання; tо hold extreme views іn polіtіcs дотримувати екстремістських політичних поглядів5) оцінка, судження, уявлення; the scіentіfіc view of the world науковий світогляд; to take a favourable view of smth. позитивно оцінити что-л.; to take a grave view of smth. строго засудити що-н., різко негативно поставитися до чого-н.; hіs view іs that we are wrong він вважає, що ми неправі6) ціль, намір; план, припущення, задум; іn view з метою, з наміром; do you have anythіng іn view for tomorrowº які у вас плани на завтраº; he dіd іt wіth a view to /wіth the view of/ savіng trouble він зробив це для того, щоб уникнути неприємностей; the law has two objects іn view закон має дві мети; у надії, з розрахунком; [див. тж. 3]; to have -s on a rіch man’s daughter мати плани щодо багатої нареченої; І have view s on a meal at the next town я розраховую пообідати в найближчому місті7) перспектива; майбутнє, що передбачається; to muster troops wіth a view to іmmіnent war мобілізувати війська в передбаченні неминучої війни; to keep /to have/ smth. іn view мати що-н. на увазі, розраховувати на що-н.; wіth no view of success ніякої перспективи на успіх; no alteratіons are іn view ніяких змін не передбачається; іn the long view у перспективі, у віддаленому майбутньому; іn the short view з точки зору найближчих результатів; to take the long view виявляти передбачливість /далекоглядність/, піклуватися про майбутнє; to take short views виявляти недалекоглядність, не думати про майбутнє, не загадувати на майбутнє8) огляд, перегляд, огляд; a prіvate view вернісаж; on view виставлений для огляду; the latest fashіons are now on view зараз демонструються останні моди; at fіrst view з першого погляду; the fіrst view would dіsplease many на перший погляд це багатьом, ймовірно, не сподобається; І should lіke to get a nearer view of іt я хотів би розглянути це ближче; the ruіn іs well worth our view ці руїни варто подивитися; юр. огляд присяжними місця злочину ; the jury had a view or the body присяжні зробили огляд тіла9) вид, аспект, сторона, план; перспектива; проекція; front view вид попереду; top view вид зверху; спец. вигляд у плані; dіstant view кіно далекий чи віддалений план ( пейзажу); sectіonal view вигляд у розрізі; general view спец. загальний план; perspectіve view спец. вигляд у перспективі, перспектива; close view зображення великим планом; exploded view тривимірне /стереоскопічне/ зображення; зображення якого-н. предмета в розібраному вигляді; he presented quіte a new view of the affaіr он презентував справу в зовсім новому світлі /плані, вигляді, аспекті/; він показав справу з зовсім іншої сторони10) резюме; огляд; the author gave abrіef view of hіs book автор дав резюме своєї книги; автор коротенько розповів зміст своєї книги11) військ. огляд; radar view зона огляду радіолокатора; aіr view огляд з повітря; all-round/panoramіc/ view круговий огляд; іn view of через (що-н.); беручи до уваги (що-н.); враховуючи (що-н.), з огляду на (що-н.); у зв’язку з (чим-н.); іn view of recent developments, we do not thіnk thіs step advіsable через останні події /з огляду на останні події/ ми вважаємо цей крок недоцільним; a bіrd’s-eye view (of smth.) а) вид із пташиного польоту /зверху/ (на що-н.); б) поверхневий, неглибокий погляд, уявлення ; a worm’s-eye view детальне, реалістичне уявлення (про що-н.)II [vjuː] v.1) оглядати, дивитися; to view a house and grounds оглянути будинок та ділянку; to view pіctures розглядати /дивитися/ картини; to view the body юр. зробити огляд тіла; order to view дозвіл на огляд (будинку, ділянки)2) розглядати у певному світлі, оцінювати, судити; the proposal іs viewed unfavourably пропозиція отримала негативну оцінку; he іs viewed unfavourably його вважають поганою людиною; the subject may be viewed іn dіfferent ways до цього питання можна підходити з різних сторін3) вивчати, розглядати; to view all sіdes of a questіon розглянути всі аспекти питання, розглянути питання у всіх аспектах4) бачити; поет. побачити; зріти5) дивитися (телевізор, кінофільм) -
8 view
1. [vju:] n1. вид, пейзаж, панорама2. вид, пейзаж, изображение (рисунок, картина, фотоснимок)to do [to take] a view of smth. - рисовать [фотографировать] что-л.
to do [to take] a view of smth. - рисовать [фотографировать] что-л.
3. видимость, поле зрения (тж. field of view)lost to /passed out of/ view - скрывшийся из виду /из поля зрения/
to the view - открыто, на виду, у всех на глазах
to rise to view - появиться, предстать перед глазами
to burst into /upon the/ view - внезапно появиться
to fade from view - постепенно исчезнуть, скрыться с глаз, растаять
in view - на виду; в пределах видимости [см. тж. 6]
to come in view (of) - а) увидеть; б) попасть в поле зрения
he came in view of the castle - а) он увидел замок; б) его стало видно из замка
land in view! - земля (видна)!
he fell off the horse in full view of his friends - он упал с лошади на глазах у друзей
the car came in /into/ view round the bend - автомобиль показался из-за поворота
4. 1) взгляд, мнение, суждение; точка зрения (тж. point of view)in my view - по-моему; по моему мнению, на мой взгляд
to state one's views on /about/ smth. - изложить /высказать/ своё мнение /свои соображения/ о чём-л.
2) pl взгляды, убеждения, воззренияto hold extreme views in politics - придерживаться экстремистских политических взглядов
5. оценка, суждение; представлениеto take a favourable view of smth. - положительно оценить что-л.
to take a grave view of smth. - строго осудить что-л., резко отрицательно отнестись к чему-л.
he takes a different view - он придерживается иного мнения, он смотрит на это иначе
his view is that we are wrong - он считает, что мы неправы
the lawyer hasn't yet formed a clear view of the case - адвокат ещё не составил себе чёткого представления о деле
6. цель, намерение; план, предположение, замыселin view - а) с целью, с намерением; he wants to find work, but he has nothing particular in view - он хочет найти работу, но у него нет никаких конкретных планов /он не имеет ничего конкретного/; do you have anything in view for tomorrow? - какие у вас планы на завтра?, что вы намерены делать завтра?; he did it with a view to /with the view of/ saving trouble - он сделал это с тем, чтобы избежать неприятностей; the law has two objects in view - закон преследует две цели; б) в надежде, с расчётом; [см. тж. 3]
I have views on a meal at the next town - я рассчитываю пообедать в ближайшем городе
7. перспектива; предвидимое будущееto muster troops with a view to imminent war - мобилизовать войска в предвидении неизбежной войны
to keep /to have/ smth. in view - иметь что-л. в виду, рассчитывать на что-л.
to have some pleasure in view - предвкушать что-л. приятное
in the long view - в перспективе, в отдалённом будущем
to take the long view - проявлять предусмотрительность /дальновидность/, заботиться о будущем
to take short views - проявлять недальновидность, не думать о будущем, не загадывать на будущее
8. 1) осмотр, просмотр, смотр, обозрениеthe latest fashions are now on view - сейчас демонстрируются последние моды
the first view would displease many - на первый взгляд это многим, вероятно, не понравится
I should like to get a nearer view of it - я хотел бы рассмотреть это поближе
2) юр. осмотр присяжными места преступления и т. п.9. вид, аспект, сторона, план; перспектива; проекцияtop view - а) вид сверху; б) спец. вид в плане
distant view - кино дальний или отдалённый план ( пейзажа)
general view - спец. общий план
perspective view - спец. вид в перспективе, перспектива
exploded view - а) трёхмерное /стереоскопическое/ изображение; б) изображение какого-л. предмета в разобранном виде
he presented quite a new view of the affair - он представил дело в совершенно новом свете /плане, виде, аспекте/; он показал дело с совершенно другой стороны
10. резюме; обзорthe author gave a brief view of his book - автор дал резюме своей книги; автор вкратце рассказал содержание своей книги
11. воен. обзорall-round /panoramic/ view - круговой обзор
♢
in view of - ввиду (чего-л.); принимая во внимание (что-л.); с учётом (чего-л.), учитывая (что-л.); в связи с (чем-л.)in view of recent developments, we do not think this step advisable - ввиду последних событий /учитывая последние события/ мы считаем этот шаг нецелесообразным
a bird's-eye view (of smth.) - а) вид с птичьего полёта /сверху/ (на что-л.); б) поверхностный, неглубокий взгляд, представление и т. п.
2. [vju:] va worm's-eye view - подробное, реалистичное представление (о чём-л.)
1. осматривать, смотретьto view pictures - рассматривать /смотреть/ картины
to view the body - юр. произвести осмотр тела
order to view - разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.)
2. рассматривать в определённом свете, оценивать, судитьthe proposal is viewed unfavourably - предложение получило отрицательную оценку
the subject may be viewed in different ways - к этому вопросу можно подходить с разных сторон
3. изучать, рассматриватьto view all sides of a question - рассмотреть все аспекты вопроса, рассмотреть вопрос во всех аспектах
4. 1) видеть2) поэт. узреть; зреть5. смотреть (телевизор, кинофильм и т. п.) -
9 view
1. n вид, пейзаж, панорама2. n вид, пейзаж, изображение3. n видимость, поле зренияto the view — открыто, на виду, у всех на глазах
to rise to view — появиться, предстать перед глазами
to fade from view — постепенно исчезнуть, скрыться с глаз, растаять
in view — на виду; в пределах видимости
4. n взгляд, мнение, суждение; точка зрения5. n взгляды, убеждения, воззрения6. n оценка, суждение; представлениеview of data — представление данных; разрез данных
7. n цель, намерение; план, предположение, замысел8. n перспектива; предвидимое будущееin the long view — в перспективе, в отдалённом будущем
worm's-eye view — "лягушачья " перспектива
9. n осмотр, просмотр, смотр, обозрениеthe first view would displease many — на первый взгляд это многим, вероятно, не понравится
10. n вид, аспект, сторона, план; перспектива; проекцияperspective view — вид в перспективе, перспектива
11. n воен. обзор12. v осматривать, смотреть13. v рассматривать в определённом свете, оценивать, судить14. v изучать, рассматриватьto view all sides of a question — рассмотреть все аспекты вопроса, рассмотреть вопрос во всех аспектах
15. v видетьto tiptoe to have a better view — подняться на цыпочки, чтобы лучше видеть
16. v поэт. узреть; зреть17. v смотретьto take a sunshine view of everything — смотреть бодро на всё, быть оптимистом
Синонимический ряд:1. account (noun) account; description2. angle (noun) angle; eyes; outlook; slant; standpoint; viewpoint3. belief (noun) assessment; belief; conception; estimation; judgment; notion; theory4. end (noun) aim; design; end; goal; intent; intention; meaning; object; objective; plan; point; purpose; reason; target5. examination (noun) analysis; audit; check-over; checkup; examination; inspection; perlustration; review; scan; scrutiny; survey6. look (noun) countenance; face; look; physiognomy; surface; visage7. opinion (noun) conviction; eye; feeling; idea; mind; opinion; persuasion; position; sentiment8. sight (noun) appearance; aspect; gaze; glimpse; outlook; panorama; perspective; picture; prospect; scene; show; sight; spectacle; vision; vista9. eye (verb) account; consider; contemplate; deem; esteem; eye; gaze; gaze upon; look; look at; look upon; reckon; regard10. scrutinize (verb) canvass; check; check over; check up; con; examine; go over; inspect; perlustrate; peruse; scrutinise; scrutinize; study; survey; vet; witness11. see (verb) behold; descry; discern; distinguish; espy; mark; mind; note; notice; observe; perceive; remark; see; twigАнтонимический ряд:delusion; disregard; error; ignore; misestimate; misjudge; overlook -
10 view
1. n1) pl взгляды, убеждения, воззрения2) оценка, суждение- state one's view on smth.- fall in with smb.'s views- form a clear view of smth.- get a cursory view of smth.- take a correct view of smth.- take a different view of smth.- take a favourable view of smth.3) цель, намерение, план- have other views for smth.- meet smb.'s views4) юр. осмотр присяжными места преступления и т.п.5)- have smth. in view•2. v1) осматривать, смотреть2) рассматривать, оценивать, судить- view smth. in a different light -
11 view
I n1. погляд, думка, точка зору; судження; pl погляди, переконання2. намір, мета; задум, план3. аспект, сторона, вид4. резюме, огляд, висновок- common views загальні погляди; погляди, які поділяють обоє партнерів, сторін- conservative views консервативні погляди, переконання- differing views відмінні погляди- diverging views відмінні погляди- extreme views крайні погляди- opposite views протилежні погляди- predominant views переважаючі погляди, переважаюча думка- progressive views прогресивні/ передові погляди- reactionary views реакційні погляди/ переконання- religious views релігійні погляди/ переконання- scientific view of the world науковий світогляд- exchange of views обмін думками- in view з метою, з наміром- in view of зважаючи на щось, через щось- in view of recent developments у зв'язку з останніми подіями- negotiation with a view to an alliance переговори з метою укладення договору- to advance a view висловити думку/ погляд- to be in view передбачатися- to form a clear view of smth. скласти чітке/ ясне уявлення про щось- to have other views for smth. мати інші плани стосовно чогось- to have smth. in view мати щось на увазі, розраховувати на щось- to have views on smth. розраховувати на щось- to hold extreme views in politics притримуватися крайніх політичних поглядів- to meet smbd.'s views виконати побажання, задовільнити прохання- to state one's views on smth. висловити свою думку/ позицію стосовно якогось питання- to take a correct view of smth. вірно оцінити щось- to take a different view of smth. по-іншому дивитися на щось, мати свою думку про щось- to take a favourable view of smth. позитивно оцінити щось- to take long views проявити передбачливість/ далекоглядність, піклуватися про майбутнє- to take short views проявити недалекоглядність, не думати про майбутнє, не загадувати з позиції далекого прицілу- on a long view з позиції далекого прицілу- on a short view беручи до уваги найближчі/ безпосередні результати- will this meet your views? чи відповідає це вашим намірам?- with this in view з цією метою- with a view to imminent war у зв'язку з неминучістю війни- with the (a) view of/ to з наміром, з метою- with a view to preventing (to prevent) a catastrophe щоб відвернути катастрофуII v розглядати; оцінювати; судити, мати судження- he views the matter in a different light він інакше дивиться на це- to view a proposal favourably позитивно оцінити пропозицію -
12 scientific
1. a научныйscientific community — научная общественность; научные круги
2. a спорт. высокого класса, техничный3. a спорт. хорошо натренированный, ловкийСинонимический ряд:1. actual (adj.) actual; external; extraneous; extrinsic; material; measurable; sure2. objective (adj.) controlled; exact; explicit; methodical; meticulous; objective; ordered; systematic; thorough -
13 world
wə:ld
1. сущ.
1) мир, свет;
вселенная around, round the world ≈ вокруг света to travel around the world ≈ путешествовать вокруг света, путешествовать по миру to bring into the world ≈ произвести на свет, родить to see the world ≈ повидать мир New World ≈ Новый свет, Америка Old World ≈ Старый свет world over ≈ во всем мире, в целом мире, по всему миру outside world ≈ внешний мир next world ≈ потусторонний мир worlds apart ≈ очень далеко world at large, whole world, entire world ≈ весь мир
2) общество great world ≈ светское общество
3) определенная сфера деятельности, мир the world of letters ≈ литературный мир the world of music ≈ мир музыки the world of sport ≈ спортивный мир financial world ≈ деловой мир scientific world ≈ научный мир
4) мир, царство the animal world ≈ животный мир the vegetable world ≈ растительный мир
5) период истории There are many problems in the modern world. ≈ В современном мире очень много проблем. ancient world ≈ древний мир medieval world ≈ средневековье modern world ≈ современность
6) кругозор, мир His world is a very narrow one. ≈ Его кругозор очень узок.
7) куча, множество He has had a world of troubles. ≈ У него была пропасть хлопот.
8) служит для усиления a world too ≈ слишком What in the world does he mean? ≈ Что, наконец, он хочет сказать? ∙ to come down in the world ≈ опуститься, утратить былое положение to come up in the world, to rise in the world ≈ сделать карьеру to think the world (of smb.) ≈ быть очень высокого мнения о ком-л. he would give the world to know ≈ он бы все отдал, только бы узнать all the world and his wife ≈ все без исключения;
все светское общество for all the world like ≈ похожий во всех отношениях for all the world as if ≈ точно так, как если бы how goes the world with you? ≈ как ваши дела?
2. прил.
1) всемирный, мировой;
охватывающий весь мир world championship ≈ первенство мира world line-up ≈ расстановка сил в мире world market ≈ мировой рынок world outlook, view ≈ мировоззрение, миропонимание world peace ≈ мир во всем мире world problems ≈ мировые проблемы world trade ≈ международная торговля
2) известный во всем мире world scientist ≈ ученый с мировым именем мир, свет, земля, земной шар - the whole /entire/ * весь мир - to bring into the * произвести на свет, родить - to come into the * появиться на свет, родиться - a citizen of the * гражданин мира, космополит - the * over, all over the * во всем мире, по всему миру - a journey round the * кругосветное путешествие - *'s fair всемирная выставка планета - are there any other inhabited *s? есть ли еще обитаемые миры, кроме нашего? мир, вселенная часть земного шара - the Third W. countries страны "третьего мира" - the Old W. Старый Свет - the New W. Новый Свет население земного шара, человечество сфера, область - the * of books мир книг - the scientific * научный мир - the * of commerce мир коммерции мир, царство - the animal * животный мир период истории - the ancient * древний мир жизнь( человека) - to begin the * вступить в жизнь - to begin the * anew начать новую жизнь - to have the * before one иметь перед собой всю жизнь;
у него все впереди - to take the * as it is /as one finds it/ приспосабливаться к жизни;
воспринимать мир таким, каков он есть - to let the * slide не стараться переделать жизнь /мир/, не идти против течения;
пренебрегать условностями - to know the * иметь опыт, знать жизнь - to come up /to rise, to make one's way/ in the * сделать карьеру, преуспеть в жизни - to come /to go/ down in the * утратить прежнее положение в обществе - how is the * using you?, how goes the * with you? (разговорное) как дела?, как живете? - the * goes very well with me( разговорное) у меня все в порядке, я живу хорошо - so goes /wags/ the * (разговорное) такова жизнь окружающая среда;
мир, мирок;
круг (знакомых и т. п.) - her middle-class * ее мещанский мирок, ее мелкобуржуазное окружение - I do not move in his * я не принадлежу к его кругу общество - the great *, the * of fashion высший свет - all the * and his wife "весь свет" - he lives out of the * он редко бывает в обществе - what will the * say? какова будет реакция общественности? - all the * knows that... всем известно, что... (разговорное) множество, масса, уйма - a * of faults уйма недостатков - a * of waters необозримая водная гладь /ширь/ - a * of money бешеные деньги - to bring upon oneself a * of trouble навлечь на себя массу неприятностей - to think the * of smb. быть чрезвычайно высокого мнения о ком-л. - the holiday did me a * /worlds/ of good отпуск принес мне огромную пользу - it makes a * of difference это совсем иное дело - they are *s apart между ними лежит пропасть (религия) мир, свет - to forsake the * отказаться /уйти/ от мира;
постричься в монахи - to go to a better * уйти в лучший мир /на тот свет/ - the other /the next/ *, the * to come тот свет, загробная жизнь - this * этот свет, этот (бренный) мир (в противоп. потустороннему миру) - in this * and the next на этом и на том свете - he is not long for this * он не жилец на этом свете - the lower /the nether/ * преисподняя, ад;
земля (в противоп. небесам) ;
этот свет в эмоц.-усил. значении: - what in the * did he mean? что же он хотел сказать? - who in the * is that fellow? кто бы это мог быть? - I do not know what in the * to do with it ума не приложу, что с этим делать - for all the * like похожий во всех отношениях - for all the * as if точно так, как если бы - to the * крайне, чрезвычайно - tired to the * устал до смерти - drunk to the * мертвецки пьян > on top of the * на вершине счастья;
вне себя от радости и т. п. > out of this * необычайный, изумительный, замечательный > her voice is simply out of this * у нее великолепный голос > she had a figure which was out of this * такой фигуры, как у нее, свет не видывал > * without end (церковное) во веки веков > not for the * ни в коем случае;
ни за что на свете > he would give the * to know that он отдал бы все на свете, чтобы узнать это;
ему страстно хочется узнать об этом > to make the best of both *s иметь и то, и другое (без необходимости выбора) > to carry the * before one преуспеть в жизни;
добиться быстрого и полного успеха > dead to the * ничего не замечающий;
не реагирующий на окружающее( о спящем, пьяном и т. п.) > the * is his oyster перед ним открыты все двери > it's a small * мир тесен относящийся ко всему миру, всемирный, мировой - a * championship первенство мира охватывающий весь мир - * peace мир во всем мире известный во всем мире - * scientist ученый с мировым именем ~ мир, царство;
the animal (vegetable) world животный (растительный) мир ~ outlook (или view) мировоззрение, миропонимание;
to begin the world вступать в новую жизнь;
not for the world ни за что на свете ~ мир, свет;
вселенная;
to bring into the world произвести на свет, родить;
the Old World Старый свет;
the New World Новый свет business ~ деловой мир to come up( или to rise) in the ~ сделать карьеру;
out of this world разг. великолепный corporate ~ деловой мир developing ~ развивающиеся страны the lower ~ преисподняя, ад;
to the world sl. крайне, совершенно;
drunk to the world = мертвецки пьян financial ~ финансовые круги for all the ~ as if точно так, как если бы;
how goes the world with you? как ваши дела?;
to know the world иметь опыт all the ~ and his wife все светское общество;
for all the world like похожий во всех отношениях fourth ~ страны с крайне низким уровнем жизни fourth ~ четвертый мир ~ общество;
the great world светское общество ~ множество, куча;
he has had a world of troubles у него была пропасть хлопот not of this ~ = не от мира сего;
he would give the world to know он бы все отдал, только бы узнать world мир, кругозор;
his world is a very narrow one его кругозор (или мирок) очень узок for all the ~ as if точно так, как если бы;
how goes the world with you? как ваши дела?;
to know the world иметь опыт for all the ~ as if точно так, как если бы;
how goes the world with you? как ваши дела?;
to know the world иметь опыт the lower ~ преисподняя, ад;
to the world sl. крайне, совершенно;
drunk to the world = мертвецки пьян not of this ~ = не от мира сего;
he would give the world to know он бы все отдал, только бы узнать to come up (или to rise) in the ~ сделать карьеру;
out of this world разг. великолепный so goes (или wags) the ~ такова жизнь;
to come down in the world опуститься, утратить былое положение to think the ~ (of smb.) быть очень высокого мнения (о ком-л.) ;
world without end на веки вечные third ~ развивающиеся страны third ~ третий мир the lower ~ преисподняя, ад;
to the world sl. крайне, совершенно;
drunk to the world = мертвецки пьян western ~ западный мир ~ служит для усиления: what in the world does he mean? что, наконец, он хочет сказать?;
a world too слишком world мир, кругозор;
his world is a very narrow one его кругозор (или мирок) очень узок ~ мир, царство;
the animal (vegetable) world животный (растительный) мир ~ мир, свет;
вселенная;
to bring into the world произвести на свет, родить;
the Old World Старый свет;
the New World Новый свет ~ мир ~ множество, куча;
he has had a world of troubles у него была пропасть хлопот ~ общество;
the great world светское общество ~ определенная сфера деятельности, мир;
the world of letters (of sport) литературный (спортивный) мир ~ служит для усиления: what in the world does he mean? что, наконец, он хочет сказать?;
a world too слишком the ~ at large весь мир;
the world over во всем мире, в целом мире ~ attr. мировой, всемирный;
world problems мировые проблемы;
world peace мир во всем мире ~ line-up расстановка сил в мире;
world market мировой рынок;
world trade международная торговля ~ определенная сфера деятельности, мир;
the world of letters (of sport) литературный (спортивный) мир ~ outlook (или view) мировоззрение, миропонимание;
to begin the world вступать в новую жизнь;
not for the world ни за что на свете the ~ at large весь мир;
the world over во всем мире, в целом мире ~ attr. мировой, всемирный;
world problems мировые проблемы;
world peace мир во всем мире ~ attr. мировой, всемирный;
world problems мировые проблемы;
world peace мир во всем мире ~ служит для усиления: what in the world does he mean? что, наконец, он хочет сказать?;
a world too слишком to think the ~ (of smb.) быть очень высокого мнения (о ком-л.) ;
world without end на веки вечные WorldBanking World "Банковский мир" (журнал, издаваемый в Великобритании) -
14 world
1. сущ.1)а) общ. мир, свет; вселеннаяthe whole [entire\] world — весь мир
to travel around the world — путешествовать вокруг света, путешествовать по миру
б) общ. население земного шара, человечествов) общ. планета; мирAre there any other inhabited worlds? — Есть ли еще обитаемые миры, кроме нашего?
2) общ. (группа стран, регион; часть земного шара)See:3) общ. сфера, область ( деятельности)the world of sport, the sports world — спортивный мир
4) общ. мир, царствоthe animal [the vegetable\] world — животный [растительный\] мир
5) общ. период историиthe ancient [the medieval\] world — древний [средневековый\] мир
6)а) общ. жизнь ( отдельного человека)to know the world — иметь опыт, знать жизнь
to come up [to rise, to make one's way\] in the world — сделать карьеру, преуспеть в жизни
б) общ. мир, мирок; круг (знакомых и т. п.); окружающая среда7) общ. общество8) общ. множество, масса, уйма2. прил.1) общ. всемирный, мировой; относящийся ко всему мируworld championship — первенство [чемпионат\] мира
See:world commerce, world economy, world experience, world government, World Island, world market, world marketing, world money, World Ocean, world organization, world outlook, world output, world price, world shop, world trade, world view, world water balance, World Development Indicators, World Economic Climate, World Economic Outlook, World Economic Survey, World Equity Benchmark Shares, World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, World Trade Agreement, World Association of Opinion and Marketing Research Professionals, World Association of Public Opinion Research, World Bank, World Confederation of Labour, World Congresses of Accounting Historians, World Court, World Customs Organization, World Federation, World Federation of Scientific Workers, World Federation of Trade Unions, World Food Programme, World Gold Council, World Health Organization, World Intellectual Property Organization, World Meteorological Organization, World Tourism Organization, World Trade Club, World Trade Organization, World Zionist Conference2) общ. известный во всем мире; распространенный во всем миреSyn:See: -
15 view
vju:
1. сущ.
1) вид;
пейзаж (тж. картина)
2) поле зрения, кругозор to burst, come into view ≈ внезапно появиться to have/keep in view ≈ не терять из виду;
иметь в виду out of view be in view to the view in view of
3) точка зрения to express, present, put forward, voice a view ≈ высказать мнение по какому-л. вопросу in my view ≈ по моему мнению short views ≈ недальновидность Syn: opinion
4) осмотр to have/take a view of smth. ≈ осмотреть что-л. on view ≈ выставленный для обозрения on the view ≈ во время осмотра, при осмотре at first view ≈ при беглом осмотре upon a closer view ≈ при внимательном рассмотрении
5) намерение Will this meet your views? ≈ Не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям? with the view of with a view to
2. гл.
1) обозревать, оглядывать, осматривать
2) оценивать, судить( о чем-л.) He views the matter in a different light. ≈ Он иначе смотрит на это. She was viewed as a serious threat to the party leadership. ≈ Она рассматривалась как серьезная угроза партийному руководству.
3) смотреть (напр., фильм) вид, пейзаж, панорама - a room with a * of the mountains комната с видом на горы вид, пейзаж, изображение (рисунок, картина, фотоснимок) - to do a * of smth. рисовать что-л. - postcards with *s of Paris открытки с видами Парижа - to do a * of smth. рисовать что-л. видимость, поле зрения (тж. field of *) - angle of * угол зрения - lost to /passed out of/ * скрывшийся из виду /из поля зрения/ - out of * вне поля зрения - out of human * недоступный глазу человека - to the * открыто, на виду, у всех на глазах - to rise to * появиться, предстать перед глазами - to burst into /upon the/ * внезапно появиться - to fade from * постепенно исчезнуть, скрыться с глаз, растаять - in * на виду;
в пределах видимости - to come in * (of) увидеть;
попасть в поле зрения - he came in * of the castle он увидел замок;
его стало видно из замка - land in *! земля (видна) ! - not a person in * никого не видно - he fell off the horse in full * of his friends он упал с лошади на глазах у друзей - the car came in /into/ * round the bend автомобиль показался из-за поворота взгляд, мнение, суждение;
точка зрения (тж. point of *) - exchange of *s обмен мнениями - in my * по-моему;
по моему мнению, на мой взгляд - to state one's *s on /about/ smth. изложить /высказать/ свое мнение /свои соображения/ о чем-л. pl взгляды, убеждения, воззрения - to hold extreme *s in politics придерживаться экстремистских политических взглядов оценка, суждение;
представление - the scientific * of the world научное мировоззрение - to take a favourable * of smth. положительно оценить что-л. - to take a grave * of smth. строго осудить что-л., резко отрицательно отнестись к чему-л. - he takes a different * он придерживается иного мнения, он смотрит на это иначе - his * is that we are wrong он считает, что мы неправы - the lawyer hasn't yet formed a clear * of the case адвокат еще не составил себе четкого представления о деле - this poet's depressing * of life мрачное мироощущение этого поэта цель, намерение;
план, предположение, замысел - in * с целью, с намерением;
в надежде, с расчетом - he wants to find work, but he has nothing particular in * он хочет найти работу, но у него нет никаких конкретных планов /он не имеет ничего конкретного/ - do you have anything in * for tomorrow? какие у вас планы на завтра?, что вы намерены делать завтра? - he did it with a * to /with the * of/ saving trouble он сделал это с тем, чтобы избежать неприятностей - the law has two objects in * закон преследует две цели - to have *s on a rich man's daughter иметь виды на богатую невесту - I have *s on a meal at the next town я рассчитываю пообедать в ближайшем городе перспектива;
предвидимое будущее - to muster troops with a * to imminent war мобилизовать войска в предвидении неизбежной войны - to keep /to have/ smth. in * иметь что-л. в виду, рассчитывать на что-л. - to have some pleasure in * предвкушать что-л. приятное - with no * of success никакой перспективы на успех - no hope in * пока никакой надежды - no alterations are in * никаких изменений не предвидится - in the long * в перспективе, в отдаленном будущем - in the short * с точки зрения ближайших результатов - to take the long * проявлять предусмотрительность /дальновидность/, заботиться о будущем - to take short *s проявлять недальновидность, не думать о будущем, не загадывать на будущее осмотр, просмотр, смотр, обозрение - a private * вернисаж - on * выставленный для обозрения - the latest fashions are now on * сейчас демонстрируются последние моды - at first * с первого взгляда - the first * would displease many на первый взгляд это многим, вероятно, не понравится - upon a closer * при ближайшем рассмотрении - I should like to get a nearer * of it я хотел бы рассмотреть это поближе - the ruin is well worth our * эти развалины стоит посмотреть (юридическое) осмотр присяжными места преступления и т. п. - the jury had a * of the body присяжные произвели осмотр тела вид, аспект, сторона, план;
перспектива;
проекция - front * вид спереди - top * вид сверху;
(специальное) вид в плане - distant * (кинематографический) дальний или отдаленный план (пейзажа) - sectional * вид в разрезе - general * (специальное) общий план - perspective * (специальное) вид в перспективе, перспектива - close * изображение крупным планом - exploded * трехмерное /стереоскопическое/ изображение;
изображение какого-л. предмета в разобранном виде - he presented quite a new * of the affair он представил дело в совершенно новом свете /плане, виде, аспекте/;
он показал дело с совершенно другой стороны резюме;
обзор - the author gave a brief * of his book автор дал резюме своей книги;
автор вкратце рассказал содержание своей книги (военное) обзор - radar * зона обзора радиолокатора - air * обзор с воздуха - all-round /panoramic/ * круговой обзор > in * of ввиду( чего-л.) ;
принимая во внимание( что-л.) ;
с учетом( чего-л.), учитывая( что-л.) ;
в связи( с чем-л.) > in * of recent developments, we do not think this step advisable ввиду последних событий /учитывая последние события/ мы считаем этот шаг нецелесообразным > a bird's-eye * (of smth.) вид с птичьего полета /сверху/ (на что-л.) ;
поверхностный, неглубокий взгляд, представление и т. п. > a worm's-eye * подробное, реалистичное представление (о чем-л.) осматривать, смотреть - to * a house and grounds осмотреть дом и участок - to * pictures рассматривать /смотреть/ картины - to * the body (юридическое) произвести осмотр тела - order to * разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) рассматривать в определенном свете, оценивать, судить - the proposal is *ed unfavourably предложение получило отрицательную оценку - he is *ed unfavourably его считают плохим человеком - the subject may be *ed in different ways к этому вопросу можно подходить с разных сторон изучать, рассматривать - to * all sides of a question рассмотреть все аспекты вопроса, рассмотреть вопрос во всех аспектах видеть узреть;
зреть смотреть (телевизор, кинофильм и т. п.) ~ осматривать;
an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) at first ~ при беглом осмотре;
upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении to be in ~ быть видимым to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду biased ~ необъективная оценка bird's eye ~ вид с птичьего полета bird's eye ~ общая перспектива we came in ~ of the bridge нас стало видно с моста;
to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду conceptual ~ вчт. концептуальное представление differing ~ особое мнение to exchange views (on smth.) обменяться взглядами или мнениями (по поводу чего-л.) view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) ~ рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.) ;
he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это to hold extreme views in politics придерживаться крайних взглядов в политике ~ вид;
пейзаж;
a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море to be in ~ предвидеться;
certain modifications may come in view предвидятся некоторые изменения;
in full view of everybody у всех на виду view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание legal ~ рассмотрение с правовых позиций private ~ выставка или просмотр картин (частной коллекции) ;
on the view во время осмотра, при осмотре ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения to pass from( smb.'s) ~ скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения;
out of view вне поля зрения to pass from (smb.'s) ~ скрыться из (чьего-л.) поля зрения;
out of view вне поля зрения short ~s недальновидность;
to take a rose-coloured view (of smth.) смотреть сквозь розовые очки (на что-л.) to the ~ (of) открыто, на виду;
to have (или to keep) in view не терять из виду;
иметь в виду;
in view of ввиду;
принимая во внимание at first ~ при беглом осмотре;
upon a closer view при внимательном рассмотрении view взгляд, мнение, точка зрения;
in my view по моему мнению;
to form a clear view of the situation составить себе ясное представление о положении дел ~ взгляд, мнение, точка зрения ~ вид;
пейзаж;
a house with a view of the sea дом видом на море ~ вид ~ вчт. визуализация ~ замысел ~ изображение ~ картина (особ. пейзаж) ~ мнение ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) ~ намерение ~ обзор ~ осматривать;
an order to view разрешение на осмотр (дома, участка и т. п.) ~ осматривать ~ осмотр;
to have (или to take) a view (of smth.) осмотреть (что-л.) ;
on view выставленный для обозрения ~ осмотр присяжными места преступления ~ оценивать ~ оценка ~ перспектива ~ поле зрения, кругозор ~ поле зрения ~ представление ~ вчт. представление ~ вчт. просматривать ~ просмотр ~ вчт. просмотр ~ рассматривать, оценивать, судить (о чем-л.) ;
he views the matter in a different light он иначе смотрит на это ~ рассматривать ~ смотреть (кинофильм, телепередачу и т. п.) ~ смотреть ~ суждение ~ точка зрения ~ поэт. узреть ~ цель ~ of data вчт. представление данных we came in ~ of the bridge мы увидели мост we came in ~ of the bridge нас стало видно с моста;
to burst (или to come) into view внезапно появиться ~ намерение;
will this meet your views? не противоречит ли это вашим намерениям?;
to have views (on smth.) иметь виды (на что-л.) with the ~ of, with a ~ to с намерением;
с целью with the ~ of, with a ~ to с намерением;
с целью worm's-eye ~ предельно ограниченное поле зрения;
неспособность видеть дальше своего носа -
16 world
n1) світ, всесвітall the world over, all over the world — в усьому світі, по всьому світу
2) сфера, галузь; колаthe world of commerce — комерційні кола, торговельний світ
3) період історії4) життя (людини)how goes the world with you? — як поживаєте?, як ваші справи?
so goes the world — розм. отаке життя
5) світ, царство6) світ, кругозір7) товариство, середовище, суспільство8) розм. безліч, багато; купа, сила-силеннаW. Bank — Міжнародний (Світовий) банк
world sadness — філос. світова скорбота
world series — спорт. щорічний чемпіонат з бейсболу (у США)
world spirit — філос. світовий дух
out of this world — божественний, чудовий, прекрасний
to come into the world — народитися, з'явитися на світ
what in the world does he mean? — що він, власне, хоче сказати?
world without end — на віки вічні; навіки-віків
* * *I n1) світ, земля, земна куляto come into the world — з'явитися на світ, народитися
a citizen of the world — громадянин світу, космополіт
the world over, all over the world — по всьому світу
world's fair — всесвітня виставка; планета; світ, всесвіт; частина земної кулі
the Third World countries — країни "третього світу"
the New World — Новий Світ; населення земної кулі, людство
2) сфера, галузьthe world of books [of art, of music] — світ книг [мистецтва, музики]
3) світ, царствоthe animal [the vegetable] world — тваринний [рослинний]світ
the ancient [the medieval] world — древній [середньовічний]світ
to have the world before one — мати перед собою все життя; = у нього все попереду
to take the world as it is /as one finds it/ — пристосовуватися до життя; сприймати світ таким, який він є
to let the world slide — не намагатися переробити життя /світ/, не йти проти течії; нехтувати умовностями
to know the world — мати досвід, знати життя
to come up /to rise, to make one's way/ in the world — зробити кар'єру
to come /to go/ down in the world — втратити колишнє положення в суспільстві
how is the world using you є, how goes the world with you — є як справиє, як живетеє
so goes /wags/ the world — таке життя; навколишнє середовище; світ, світок; коло ( знайомих)
her middle-class world — її міщанський світок, її мілко-буржуазне оточення
6) суспільствоthe great world, the world or fashion — вищий світ
all the world and his wife — "весь світ"
all the world knows that... — усім відомо, що...
7) безліч, масаto think the world of smb — бути надзвичайно високої думки про кого-н.
the holiday did me a world /worlds/ of good — відпустка принесла мені багато користі
8) peл. світto forsake the world — відмовитися /піти/ від світу; постригтися в монахи
to go to a better world — піти у кращий світ /на той світ/; the other /the next/ world, the world to come той світ, загробне життя
this world — цей світ, цей тлінний світ(в протист. потойбічному світу)
in this world and the next — на цьому, на тому світі
the lower /the nether/ world — пекло; земля (в протист. небесам); цей світ
9) емоц.- підсил.what in the world did he mean — що ж він хотів сказатиє
I do not know what in the world to do with it — не можу збагнути, що з цим робити
for all the world as if — точно так, якби
to the world — вкрай, надзвичайно
on top of the world — на вершині щастя; не в собі від радощів
out of this world — незвичайний, чудовий
she had a figure which was out of this world — такої фігури, як у неї, світ не ще бачив
world without end — цepк. на віка віків
not for the world — ни в якому разі; ні за що в світі
he would give the world to know that — він віддав би все на світі, щоб дізнатися про це
to make the best of both worlds — мати е те, інше ( без необхідності вибору)
II adead to the world — що нічого не помічає; що не реагує на оточення (про сплячого, п'яного)
1) що відноситься до всього світу, всесвітній, світовий -
17 Philosophy
And what I believe to be more important here is that I find in myself an infinity of ideas of certain things which cannot be assumed to be pure nothingness, even though they may have perhaps no existence outside of my thought. These things are not figments of my imagination, even though it is within my power to think of them or not to think of them; on the contrary, they have their own true and immutable natures. Thus, for example, when I imagine a triangle, even though there may perhaps be no such figure anywhere in the world outside of my thought, nor ever have been, nevertheless the figure cannot help having a certain determinate nature... or essence, which is immutable and eternal, which I have not invented and which does not in any way depend upon my mind. (Descartes, 1951, p. 61)Let us console ourselves for not knowing the possible connections between a spider and the rings of Saturn, and continue to examine what is within our reach. (Voltaire, 1961, p. 144)As modern physics started with the Newtonian revolution, so modern philosophy starts with what one might call the Cartesian Catastrophe. The catastrophe consisted in the splitting up of the world into the realms of matter and mind, and the identification of "mind" with conscious thinking. The result of this identification was the shallow rationalism of l'esprit Cartesien, and an impoverishment of psychology which it took three centuries to remedy even in part. (Koestler, 1964, p. 148)It has been made of late a reproach against natural philosophy that it has struck out on a path of its own, and has separated itself more and more widely from the other sciences which are united by common philological and historical studies. The opposition has, in fact, been long apparent, and seems to me to have grown up mainly under the influence of the Hegelian philosophy, or, at any rate, to have been brought out into more distinct relief by that philosophy.... The sole object of Kant's "Critical Philosophy" was to test the sources and the authority of our knowledge, and to fix a definite scope and standard for the researches of philosophy, as compared with other sciences.... [But Hegel's] "Philosophy of Identity" was bolder. It started with the hypothesis that not only spiritual phenomena, but even the actual world-nature, that is, and man-were the result of an act of thought on the part of a creative mind, similar, it was supposed, in kind to the human mind.... The philosophers accused the scientific men of narrowness; the scientific men retorted that the philosophers were crazy. And so it came about that men of science began to lay some stress on the banishment of all philosophic influences from their work; while some of them, including men of the greatest acuteness, went so far as to condemn philosophy altogether, not merely as useless, but as mischievous dreaming. Thus, it must be confessed, not only were the illegitimate pretensions of the Hegelian system to subordinate to itself all other studies rejected, but no regard was paid to the rightful claims of philosophy, that is, the criticism of the sources of cognition, and the definition of the functions of the intellect. (Helmholz, quoted in Dampier, 1966, pp. 291-292)Philosophy remains true to its classical tradition by renouncing it. (Habermas, 1972, p. 317)I have not attempted... to put forward any grand view of the nature of philosophy; nor do I have any such grand view to put forth if I would. It will be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the history of "howlers" and progress in philosophy as the debunking of howlers. It will also be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the enterprise of putting forward a priori truths about the world.... I see philosophy as a field which has certain central questions, for example, the relation between thought and reality.... It seems obvious that in dealing with these questions philosophers have formulated rival research programs, that they have put forward general hypotheses, and that philosophers within each major research program have modified their hypotheses by trial and error, even if they sometimes refuse to admit that that is what they are doing. To that extent philosophy is a "science." To argue about whether philosophy is a science in any more serious sense seems to me to be hardly a useful occupation.... It does not seem to me important to decide whether science is philosophy or philosophy is science as long as one has a conception of both that makes both essential to a responsible view of the world and of man's place in it. (Putnam, 1975, p. xvii)What can philosophy contribute to solving the problem of the relation [of] mind to body? Twenty years ago, many English-speaking philosophers would have answered: "Nothing beyond an analysis of the various mental concepts." If we seek knowledge of things, they thought, it is to science that we must turn. Philosophy can only cast light upon our concepts of those things.This retreat from things to concepts was not undertaken lightly. Ever since the seventeenth century, the great intellectual fact of our culture has been the incredible expansion of knowledge both in the natural and in the rational sciences (mathematics, logic).The success of science created a crisis in philosophy. What was there for philosophy to do? Hume had already perceived the problem in some degree, and so surely did Kant, but it was not until the twentieth century, with the Vienna Circle and with Wittgenstein, that the difficulty began to weigh heavily. Wittgenstein took the view that philosophy could do no more than strive to undo the intellectual knots it itself had tied, so achieving intellectual release, and even a certain illumination, but no knowledge. A little later, and more optimistically, Ryle saw a positive, if reduced role, for philosophy in mapping the "logical geography" of our concepts: how they stood to each other and how they were to be analyzed....Since that time, however, philosophers in the "analytic" tradition have swung back from Wittgensteinian and even Rylean pessimism to a more traditional conception of the proper role and tasks of philosophy. Many analytic philosophers now would accept the view that the central task of philosophy is to give an account, or at least play a part in giving an account, of the most general nature of things and of man. (Armstrong, 1990, pp. 37-38)8) Philosophy's Evolving Engagement with Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive ScienceIn the beginning, the nature of philosophy's engagement with artificial intelligence and cognitive science was clear enough. The new sciences of the mind were to provide the long-awaited vindication of the most potent dreams of naturalism and materialism. Mind would at last be located firmly within the natural order. We would see in detail how the most perplexing features of the mental realm could be supported by the operations of solely physical laws upon solely physical stuff. Mental causation (the power of, e.g., a belief to cause an action) would emerge as just another species of physical causation. Reasoning would be understood as a kind of automated theorem proving. And the key to both was to be the depiction of the brain as the implementation of multiple higher level programs whose task was to manipulate and transform symbols or representations: inner items with one foot in the physical (they were realized as brain states) and one in the mental (they were bearers of contents, and their physical gymnastics were cleverly designed to respect semantic relationships such as truth preservation). (A. Clark, 1996, p. 1)Socrates of Athens famously declared that "the unexamined life is not worth living," and his motto aptly explains the impulse to philosophize. Taking nothing for granted, philosophy probes and questions the fundamental presuppositions of every area of human inquiry.... [P]art of the job of the philosopher is to keep at a certain critical distance from current doctrines, whether in the sciences or the arts, and to examine instead how the various elements in our world-view clash, or fit together. Some philosophers have tried to incorporate the results of these inquiries into a grand synoptic view of the nature of reality and our human relationship to it. Others have mistrusted system-building, and seen their primary role as one of clarifications, or the removal of obstacles along the road to truth. But all have shared the Socratic vision of using the human intellect to challenge comfortable preconceptions, insisting that every aspect of human theory and practice be subjected to continuing critical scrutiny....Philosophy is, of course, part of a continuing tradition, and there is much to be gained from seeing how that tradition originated and developed. But the principal object of studying the materials in this book is not to pay homage to past genius, but to enrich one's understanding of central problems that are as pressing today as they have always been-problems about knowledge, truth and reality, the nature of the mind, the basis of right action, and the best way to live. These questions help to mark out the territory of philosophy as an academic discipline, but in a wider sense they define the human predicament itself; they will surely continue to be with us for as long as humanity endures. (Cottingham, 1996, pp. xxi-xxii)10) The Distinction between Dionysian Man and Apollonian Man, between Art and Creativity and Reason and Self- ControlIn his study of ancient Greek culture, The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche drew what would become a famous distinction, between the Dionysian spirit, the untamed spirit of art and creativity, and the Apollonian, that of reason and self-control. The story of Greek civilization, and all civilizations, Nietzsche implied, was the gradual victory of Apollonian man, with his desire for control over nature and himself, over Dionysian man, who survives only in myth, poetry, music, and drama. Socrates and Plato had attacked the illusions of art as unreal, and had overturned the delicate cultural balance by valuing only man's critical, rational, and controlling consciousness while denigrating his vital life instincts as irrational and base. The result of this division is "Alexandrian man," the civilized and accomplished Greek citizen of the later ancient world, who is "equipped with the greatest forces of knowledge" but in whom the wellsprings of creativity have dried up. (Herman, 1997, pp. 95-96)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Philosophy
-
18 Bibliography
■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reflections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
-
19 Clarke, Arthur Charles
[br]b. 16 December 1917 Minehead, Somerset, England[br]English writer of science fiction who correctly predicted the use of geo-stationary earth satellites for worldwide communications.[br]Whilst still at Huish's Grammar School, Taunton, Clarke became interested in both space science and science fiction. Unable to afford a scientific education at the time (he later obtained a BSc at King's College, London), he pursued both interests in his spare time while working in the Government Exchequer and Audit Department between 1936 and 1941. He was a founder member of the British Interplanetary Society, subsequently serving as its Chairman in 1946–7 and 1950–3. From 1941 to 1945 he served in the Royal Air Force, becoming a technical officer in the first GCA (Ground Controlled Approach) radar unit. There he began to produce the first of many science-fiction stories. In 1949–50 he was an assistant editor of Science Abstracts at the Institution of Electrical Engineers.As a result of his two interests, he realized during the Second World War that an artificial earth satellite in an equatorial orbital with a radius of 35,000 km (22,000 miles) would appear to be stationary, and that three such geo-stationary, or synchronous, satellites could be used for worldwide broadcast or communications. He described these ideas in a paper published in Wireless World in 1945. Initially there was little response, but within a few years the idea was taken up by the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration and in 1965 the first synchronous satellite, Early Bird, was launched into orbit.In the 1950s he moved to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to pursue an interest in underwater exploration, but he continued to write science fiction, being known in particular for his contribution to the making of the classic Stanley Kubrick science-fiction film 2001: A Space Odyssey, based on his book of the same title.[br]Principal Honours and DistinctionsClarke received many honours for both his scientific and science-fiction writings. For his satellite communication ideas his awards include the Franklin Institute Gold Medal 1963 and Honorary Fellowship of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1976. For his science-fiction writing he received the UNESCO Kalinga Prize (1961) and many others. In 1979 he became Chancellor of Moratuwa University in Sri Lanka and in 1980 Vikran Scrabhai Professor at the Physical Research Laboratory of the University of Ahmedabad.Bibliography1945. "Extra-terrestrial relays: can rocket stations give world wide coverage?", Wireless World L1: 305 (puts forward his ideas for geo-stationary communication satellites).1946. "Astronomical radar: some future possibilities", Wireless World 52:321.1948, "Electronics and space flight", Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 7:49. Other publications, mainly science-fiction novels, include: 1955, Earthlight, 1956, TheCoast of Coral; 1958, Voice Across the Sea; 1961, Fall of Moondust; 1965, Voicesfrom the Sky, 1977, The View from Serendip; 1979, Fountain of Paradise; 1984, Ascent to Orbit: A Scientific Autobiography, and 1984, 2010: Odyssey Two (a sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey that was also made into a film).Further Reading1986, Encyclopaedia Britannica.1991, Who's Who, London: A. \& C.Black.See also: Pierce, John RobinsonKF -
20 Psychology
We come therefore now to that knowledge whereunto the ancient oracle directeth us, which is the knowledge of ourselves; which deserveth the more accurate handling, by how much it toucheth us more nearly. This knowledge, as it is the end and term of natural philosophy in the intention of man, so notwithstanding it is but a portion of natural philosophy in the continent of nature.... [W]e proceed to human philosophy or Humanity, which hath two parts: the one considereth man segregate, or distributively; the other congregate, or in society. So as Human philosophy is either Simple and Particular, or Conjugate and Civil. Humanity Particular consisteth of the same parts whereof man consisteth; that is, of knowledges which respect the Body, and of knowledges that respect the Mind... how the one discloseth the other and how the one worketh upon the other... [:] the one is honored with the inquiry of Aristotle, and the other of Hippocrates. (Bacon, 1878, pp. 236-237)The claims of Psychology to rank as a distinct science are... not smaller but greater than those of any other science. If its phenomena are contemplated objectively, merely as nervo-muscular adjustments by which the higher organisms from moment to moment adapt their actions to environing co-existences and sequences, its degree of specialty, even then, entitles it to a separate place. The moment the element of feeling, or consciousness, is used to interpret nervo-muscular adjustments as thus exhibited in the living beings around, objective Psychology acquires an additional, and quite exceptional, distinction. (Spencer, 1896, p. 141)Kant once declared that psychology was incapable of ever raising itself to the rank of an exact natural science. The reasons that he gives... have often been repeated in later times. In the first place, Kant says, psychology cannot become an exact science because mathematics is inapplicable to the phenomena of the internal sense; the pure internal perception, in which mental phenomena must be constructed,-time,-has but one dimension. In the second place, however, it cannot even become an experimental science, because in it the manifold of internal observation cannot be arbitrarily varied,-still less, another thinking subject be submitted to one's experiments, comformably to the end in view; moreover, the very fact of observation means alteration of the observed object. (Wundt, 1904, p. 6)It is [Gustav] Fechner's service to have found and followed the true way; to have shown us how a "mathematical psychology" may, within certain limits, be realized in practice.... He was the first to show how Herbart's idea of an "exact psychology" might be turned to practical account. (Wundt, 1904, pp. 6-7)"Mind," "intellect," "reason," "understanding," etc. are concepts... that existed before the advent of any scientific psychology. The fact that the naive consciousness always and everywhere points to internal experience as a special source of knowledge, may, therefore, be accepted for the moment as sufficient testimony to the rights of psychology as science.... "Mind," will accordingly be the subject, to which we attribute all the separate facts of internal observation as predicates. The subject itself is determined p. 17) wholly and exclusively by its predicates. (Wundt, 1904,The study of animal psychology may be approached from two different points of view. We may set out from the notion of a kind of comparative physiology of mind, a universal history of the development of mental life in the organic world. Or we may make human psychology the principal object of investigation. Then, the expressions of mental life in animals will be taken into account only so far as they throw light upon the evolution of consciousness in man.... Human psychology... may confine itself altogether to man, and generally has done so to far too great an extent. There are plenty of psychological text-books from which you would hardly gather that there was any other conscious life than the human. (Wundt, 1907, pp. 340-341)The Behaviorist began his own formulation of the problem of psychology by sweeping aside all medieval conceptions. He dropped from his scientific vocabulary all subjective terms such as sensation, perception, image, desire, purpose, and even thinking and emotion as they were subjectively defined. (Watson, 1930, pp. 5-6)According to the medieval classification of the sciences, psychology is merely a chapter of special physics, although the most important chapter; for man is a microcosm; he is the central figure of the universe. (deWulf, 1956, p. 125)At the beginning of this century the prevailing thesis in psychology was Associationism.... Behavior proceeded by the stream of associations: each association produced its successors, and acquired new attachments with the sensations arriving from the environment.In the first decade of the century a reaction developed to this doctrine through the work of the Wurzburg school. Rejecting the notion of a completely self-determining stream of associations, it introduced the task ( Aufgabe) as a necessary factor in describing the process of thinking. The task gave direction to thought. A noteworthy innovation of the Wurzburg school was the use of systematic introspection to shed light on the thinking process and the contents of consciousness. The result was a blend of mechanics and phenomenalism, which gave rise in turn to two divergent antitheses, Behaviorism and the Gestalt movement. The behavioristic reaction insisted that introspection was a highly unstable, subjective procedure.... Behaviorism reformulated the task of psychology as one of explaining the response of organisms as a function of the stimuli impinging upon them and measuring both objectively. However, Behaviorism accepted, and indeed reinforced, the mechanistic assumption that the connections between stimulus and response were formed and maintained as simple, determinate functions of the environment.The Gestalt reaction took an opposite turn. It rejected the mechanistic nature of the associationist doctrine but maintained the value of phenomenal observation. In many ways it continued the Wurzburg school's insistence that thinking was more than association-thinking has direction given to it by the task or by the set of the subject. Gestalt psychology elaborated this doctrine in genuinely new ways in terms of holistic principles of organization.Today psychology lives in a state of relatively stable tension between the poles of Behaviorism and Gestalt psychology.... (Newell & Simon, 1963, pp. 279-280)As I examine the fate of our oppositions, looking at those already in existence as guide to how they fare and shape the course of science, it seems to me that clarity is never achieved. Matters simply become muddier and muddier as we go down through time. Thus, far from providing the rungs of a ladder by which psychology gradually climbs to clarity, this form of conceptual structure leads rather to an ever increasing pile of issues, which we weary of or become diverted from, but never really settle. (Newell, 1973b, pp. 288-289)The subject matter of psychology is as old as reflection. Its broad practical aims are as dated as human societies. Human beings, in any period, have not been indifferent to the validity of their knowledge, unconcerned with the causes of their behavior or that of their prey and predators. Our distant ancestors, no less than we, wrestled with the problems of social organization, child rearing, competition, authority, individual differences, personal safety. Solving these problems required insights-no matter how untutored-into the psychological dimensions of life. Thus, if we are to follow the convention of treating psychology as a young discipline, we must have in mind something other than its subject matter. We must mean that it is young in the sense that physics was young at the time of Archimedes or in the sense that geometry was "founded" by Euclid and "fathered" by Thales. Sailing vessels were launched long before Archimedes discovered the laws of bouyancy [ sic], and pillars of identical circumference were constructed before anyone knew that C IID. We do not consider the ship builders and stone cutters of antiquity physicists and geometers. Nor were the ancient cave dwellers psychologists merely because they rewarded the good conduct of their children. The archives of folk wisdom contain a remarkable collection of achievements, but craft-no matter how perfected-is not science, nor is a litany of successful accidents a discipline. If psychology is young, it is young as a scientific discipline but it is far from clear that psychology has attained this status. (Robinson, 1986, p. 12)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Psychology
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
The Map that Changed the World — is a book by Simon Winchester. It tells the story of geologist William Smith and his great achievement, the first geologic map of England and Wales, the first geologic map in the worldFact|date=July 2008. Smith s pivotal insights were that each… … Wikipedia
The Primary Classical Language of the World — is a 1966 book by Devaneya Pavanar.In this book, Pavanar in the English language details his claim that Tamil is a superior and more divine language than Sanskrit. In his view the Tamil language originated in Lemuria ( ta. இலெமூரியா… … Wikipedia
The Outstanding Young Persons of the World (TOYP) — program serves to formally recognize young people who excel in their chosen fields and exemplify the best attributes of the world s young people. The program is sponsored by Junior Chamber International (JCI). [ [http://www.jci.cc/ Welcome to JCI … Wikipedia
The World Without Us — Infobox Book name = The World Without Us author = Alan Weisman country = United States language = English genre = Non fiction publisher = St. Martin s Thomas Dunne Books release date = July 10, 2007 media type = Print (Hardback Paperback) and… … Wikipedia
Islamic economics in the world — This is a sub article of Islamic economic jurisprudence and Muslim world.Islamic economics in practice, or economic policies supported by self identified Islamic groups, has varied throughout its long history.Early Islamic economicsEarly reforms… … Wikipedia
History of the world — The history of the world [Williams, H. S. (1904). The historians history of the world; a comprehensive narrative of the rise and development of nations as recorded by over two thousand of the great writers of all ages. New York: The Outlook… … Wikipedia
Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center — The controlled demolition hypothesis is a 9/11 conspiracy theory that claims the complete structural failure of the World Trade Center towers was not caused by the plane crash damage that occurred as part of the September 11, 2001 attacks, nor by … Wikipedia
The Botanic Garden — (1791) is a set of two poems, The Economy of Vegetation and The Loves of the Plants , by the British poet and naturalist Erasmus Darwin. The Economy of Vegetation celebrates technological innovation, scientific discovery and offers theories… … Wikipedia
Scientific realism — is, at the most general level, the view that the world described by science is the real world, as it is, independent of what we might take it to be. Within philosophy of science, it is often framed as an answer to the question what does the… … Wikipedia
New7Wonders of the World — This article is about the New 7 Wonders Foundation list. For other uses, see Wonders of the World. New7Wonders of the World (2001 2007) was an initiative started in 2001 by the Swiss corporation New7Wonders Foundation to choose Wonders of the… … Wikipedia
Collapse of the World Trade Center — Coordinates: 40°42′41.12″N 74°00′44.00″W / … Wikipedia