-
1 intuitions
-
2 intuitions
• intuice -
3 intuitions
-
4 intuitions
-
5 intuitions
nინტუიციები -
6 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
-
7 intuition
[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuition2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuition•* * *[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuition2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuition• -
8 intuition
nounIntuition, die* * *[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) die Intuition2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) die Intuition•- academic.ru/39079/intuitive">intuitive* * *in·tui·tion[ˌɪntjuˈɪʃən, AM -tuˈ-]n Intuition fmy own \intuition is that... aus dem Bauch heraus würde ich sagen, dass...I just had an \intuition that... ich hatte einfach die Eingebung, dass...to base one's judgement on \intuition intuitiv entscheiden▪ \intuitions pl [Vor]ahnungen pl* * *["Intjuː'ISən]nIntuition f; (of future events etc) (Vor)ahnung f (of von)* * *1. Intuition f:a) unmittelbares Erkennen oder Wahrnehmenb) (plötzliche) Eingebung oder Erkenntnis2. intuitives Wissen* * *nounIntuition, diehave an intuition that... — eine Eingebung haben od. intuitiv spüren, dass...
* * *n.Einfühlungsvermögen n.Eingebung f.Intuition f. -
9 intuition
intju'iʃən1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuición2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuición•intuition n intuicióntr[ɪntjʊː'ɪʃən]1 intuición nombre femeninointuition [.ɪntʊ'ɪʃən, -tjʊ-] n: intuición fn.• intuición s.f.'ɪntuː'ɪʃən, ˌɪntjuː'ɪʃənmass & count noun intuición ffemale o women's intuition — intuición femenina
[ˌɪntjuː'ɪʃǝn]N intuición f* * *['ɪntuː'ɪʃən, ˌɪntjuː'ɪʃən]mass & count noun intuición ffemale o women's intuition — intuición femenina
-
10 consult
1. intransitive verb 2. transitive verb(seek information from) konsultieren; befragen [Orakel]; fragen, konsultieren, zurate ziehen [Arzt, Fachmann]consult a list/book — in einer Liste/einem Buch nachsehen
consult one's watch — auf die Uhr sehen
consult a dictionary — in einem Wörterbuch nachschlagen
* * *1) (to seek advice or information from: Consult your doctor; He consulted his watch; He consulted with me about what we should do next.) befragen•- academic.ru/15553/consultant">consultant- consultation* * *con·sult[kənˈsʌlt]II. vt1. (ask)to \consult a doctor/lawyer/specialist einen Arzt/Anwalt/Spezialisten konsultieren geh [o zurate ziehen2. (look at)▪ to \consult sth etw heranziehen [o zurate ziehen]I'll \consult my diary ich seh mal in meinem Kalender nachto \consult a dictionary in einem Wörterbuch nachschlagento \consult a list/map in einer Liste/auf einer Karte nachsehento \consult the oracle das Orakel befragento \consult one's watch auf die Uhr sehen3. (consider)▪ to \consult sth etw prüfento \consult one's feelings/intuitions auf sein Gefühl/seine Intuition hörenI have to \consult my feelings before... ich muss erst mit mir zurate gehen, bevor...* * *[kən'sʌlt]1. vt1) (= ask) sich besprechen mit, konsultieren; lawyer, doctor etc konsultieren, zurate or zu Rate ziehen; dictionary nachschlagen in (+dat), konsultieren (geh); map nachsehen auf (+dat); oracle befragen; horoscope nachlesen; clock sehen auf (+acc)he might have consulted me — das hätte er auch mit mir besprechen können, er hätte mich auch konsultieren können
you don't have to consult me about every little detail — Sie brauchen mich nicht wegen jeder Kleinigkeit zu fragen
he did it without consulting anyone — er hat das getan, ohne jemanden zu fragen
2) (form: consider) bedenken2. vi(= confer) sich beraten, beratschlagento consult together ( over sth) — (etw) gemeinsam beraten
* * *consult [kənˈsʌlt]A v/t1. um Rat fragen, zurate ziehen, konsultieren ( alle:about wegen):consult one’s doctor seinen Arzt fragen;consult one’s watch auf die Uhr schauenconsult an author bei einem Autor nachschlagen3. berücksichtigen, in Erwägung ziehen, im Auge haben:B v/i1. (sich) beraten, beratschlagen ( beide:with mit;about über akk)* * *1. intransitive verbsich beraten ( with mit)2. transitive verb(seek information from) konsultieren; befragen [Orakel]; fragen, konsultieren, zurate ziehen [Arzt, Fachmann]consult a list/book — in einer Liste/einem Buch nachsehen
* * *v.befragen v.konsultieren v.um Rat fragen ausdr.zuziehen v. -
11 intuition
intju'iʃən1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuisjon2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) fornemmelse, anelse•intuisjonsubst. \/ˌɪntjʊˈɪʃ(ə)n\/1) intuisjon, instinktiv oppfatning, umiddelbar innsikt2) følelse -
12 intuition
[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) innsæi2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) innsæi• -
13 intuition
ösztönös megérzés, intuíció* * *[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) ösztönös megérzés2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuíció• -
14 intuition
[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuição2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuição•* * *in.tu.i.tion[intju'iʃən] n intuição, percepção. -
15 intuition
n. sezgi, sezi, önsezi* * *içine doğma* * *[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) önsezi, içe doğma2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) içe doğan his, sezilen şey• -
16 intuition
[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) nagon2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) slutnja•* * *[intjuíšən]nounintuicija, neposredna notranja spoznava -
17 intuition
• näkemys• intuitio• havainto• ennakkoaavistus• sisäinen näkemys• välitön taju* * *intju'iʃən1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuitio2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuitio• -
18 intuition
[English Word] intuition[English Plural] intuitions[Swahili Word] anga[Swahili Plural] maanga[Part of Speech] noun[Class] 5/6[Related Words] -angaa[Terminology] psychology------------------------------------------------------------ -
19 intuition
[ˌɪntjuː'ɪʃn] [AE -tuː-]* * *[intju'iʃən]1) (the power of understanding or ralizing something without thinking it out: She knew by intuition that he was telling her the truth.) intuizione2) (something understood or realized by this power: Her intuitions are always right.) intuizione•* * *intuition /ɪntju:ˈɪʃn/, ( USA) /ɪntu:ˈɪʃn/n.1 [u] (filos.) intuizione2 [u] intuizione; intuito3 intuizione; cosa intuita● to have great powers of intuition, avere un grande intuito □ woman's intuition, intuito femminileintuitionala.intuitivo: intuitional power, facoltà intuitiva.* * *[ˌɪntjuː'ɪʃn] [AE -tuː-] -
20 intuitional
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
Intuitions — (The Gift en anglais et Le Don au Québec) est un film américain réalisé par Sam Raimi, sorti en 2001. Sommaire 1 Synopsis 2 Fiche technique 3 Distribution … Wikipédia en Français
intuitions — in·tu·i·tion || ‚ɪntuË ÉªÊƒn / tju n. perception without conscious reasoning, sixth sense, presentiment, insight … English contemporary dictionary
Critique of Pure Reason — Part of a series on Immanuel … Wikipedia
INTUITION — Le terme d’intuition désigne la manière d’être d’une connaissance qui comprend directement son objet, par un contact sans médiats avec lui, et sans le secours des signes ou des procédés expérimentaux. À ces caractères d’immédiateté on relie en… … Encyclopédie Universelle
Immanuel Kant — Kant redirects here. For other uses, see Kant (disambiguation). See also: Kant (surname) Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant Full name Immanuel Kant Born 22 April 1724 … Wikipedia
Phenomenology (The beginnings of) — The beginnings of phenomenology Husserl and his predecessors Richard Cobb Stevens Edmund Husserl was the founder of phenomenology, one of the principal movements of twentieth century philosophy. His principal contribution to philosophy was his… … History of philosophy
Intuition (philosophy) — Intuition is the act by which the mind perceives the agreement or disagreement of two ideas. When using only intuition, the truth of the proposition is immediately known right then, the moment it is presented. [ AJ Giannini, J Daood,MC Giannini,… … Wikipedia
Kant’s Copernican revolution — Daniel Bonevac Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason was to transform the philosophical world, at once bringing the Enlightenment to its highest intellectual development and establishing a new set of problems that would dominate philosophy in… … History of philosophy
Schema (Kant) — In Kantian philosophy, a schema (plural: schemata ) is the procedural rule by which a category or pure, non empirical concept is associated with a mental image of an object. It is supposedly produced by the imagination through the pure form of… … Wikipedia
Experimental philosophy — is a form of philosophical inquiry that makes at least partial use of quantitative research especially opinion polling in order to address philosophical questions. This is in contrast with more traditional methods found in analytic philosophy,… … Wikipedia
metaphysics — /met euh fiz iks/, n. (used with a sing. v.) 1. the branch of philosophy that treats of first principles, includes ontology and cosmology, and is intimately connected with epistemology. 2. philosophy, esp. in its more abstruse branches. 3. the… … Universalium