צריך

צָָרִיך

должно быть
вынужденный
должен
обязательный
нужный
нужно
надлежать
надо

צָרִיךְm., צְרִיכָה f. (צָרַךְ) needing; needed; he (she, it) must. Sabb.II, 7 שלשה … צ׳ אדם לומרוכ׳ a man must order three things B. Bath. 110a הנושא אשה צ׳ שיבדוקוכ׳ he who is about to marry a woman, should investigate the character of her brothers. Ber.13a צ׳ כונה must be read with the intention to comply with the law. Ib. 14a, a. fr. ואין צ׳ לומר (abbrev. ואצ״ל, or וא״צ לומר) and needless to say, of course. Yoma 83a חולה אומר צ׳ … אינו צ׳ if the patient says that he needs food (cannot fast), and the physician says, he does not need. Ib. צ׳ אני I must have food. Tosef.Ḥag.II, 11 צְרִיכֵנִיוכ׳ I must offer it Pes.5a, a. fr. אינו צ׳ this reference to a Biblical verse is unnecessary. Y.Ḥag.II, 78a top; Snh.46a, a. e. השעה צ׳ לכך the condition of the time required such a measure; a. v. fr. צריכה (sub. שאלה, בדיקה) is questionable, is undecided. Y.Ned.IV, beg.38c לקצור צ׳ ולבצור צ׳ (not צריכא) as to harvesting and grape-cutting, it is questionable (whether he may borrow tools of one from whom he has vowed not to derive any benefit, v. הֲנָאָה).צ׳ לנקביו, v. נֶקֶב, a. צָרַךְ.Pl. צְרִיכִים, צְרִיכִין; צְרִיכוֹת, Sabb.55b, a. e. אנו צ׳. v. מוֹדָֹעִי. Ber.13a, a. fr. מצות צ׳ כונה, v. כַּוָּנָה. Keth.21b אונן צ׳ להעדוכ׳ need not testify before court (to the identity of their signature); a. v. fr.צְרִיכֵי, Shek. IV, 7 Y. ed., v. צוֹרֶךְ.

צריךTarg. Ps. 38:1 some ed., v. צְרִירָא.

צְרִיךְ to need, v. צְרַךְ.

צְרִיךְm., צְרִיכָא I f. = h צָרִיךְ. Targ. 1 Chr. 28:12. Targ. O. Gen. 16:12. Targ. Is. 53:2; a. fr.Taan.20b כל מאן דצ׳וכ׳ whosoever is in need, let him come and eat. Ib. כל דצ׳ ליתיוכ׳ let whoever needs (to wash his hands) enter ; a. fr. צריכא a) (in Y.) it is doubtful, v. צָרִיךְ. Y.Gitt.IV, 46a, v. אפרכוריס. Y.Ned.V, end, 54b תמן צ׳ ליהוכ׳ there it was doubtful to him, and here, v. פְּשִׁיטָא; a. fr.b) ( it is) necessary to state it. Ber.21a sq. וצ׳ דאי אשמעינן אימא לא׃ צ׳ and it was necessary (to teach both cases), for, if we had been taught only the first case, we might have thought …, and if we had been taught only the second case, we might have thought …: hence it was necessary. Pes.21a למה לי למיתנא … צ׳ דאי … צ׳ why was it necessary to say ‘domestic animals and ‘beasts of chase? It was necessary, for if …: hence it was necessary.לא צריכא ד׳ (sub. אלא) it would not have been necessary but for. Taan.20b לא צ׳ דנפלווכ׳ it would not have been necessary to use the double expression ‘ruinous and ‘liable to fall, were it not for the sake of intimating a case like that of walls which have fallen in consequence of their height, or which stand on the edga of a river. Yoma 83b פשיטא לא צ׳ בשבת is it not self-evident? It was necessary to state it for the eventuality of its being on the Sabbath. B. Mets.30b לא צ׳ דהוהוכ׳ it means a case, when he saw the animal pasturing ; a. v. fr.Pl. צְרִיכִין, צְרִיכֵי; צְרִיכָן. Targ. Y. Lev. 23:42. Targ. 2 Sam. 21:4; a. fr.B. Mets.31a עומרין דצ׳ לארעא sheaves which need the ground (whereon they lie to ripen). Ib. צ׳ דאיוכ׳ all these three passages are necessary, for if Pes.23a וצ׳ and both clauses are necessary; a. fr.

должен