-
61 principale
1. adj main2. m boss* * *principale agg. principal, main, chief: la città principale, the principal town; i fiumi principali d'Italia, the chief rivers of Italy; i miei interessi principali, my chief interests; le opere principali di un autore, the main works of an author; il punto principale di un argomento, the main point of an argument; lo scopo principale, the main (o chief) object; il motivo principale, the main reason; la sede principale di una banca, the head office of a bank; passammo dall'ingresso principale, we went in through the main entrance; la strada principale di una città, the main street of a town // socio principale, senior partner // (gramm.) proposizione principale, principal (o main) clause // (ferr.) linea principale, main line // (teatr.) parte principale, leading role // (mat.) ( valore) principale, principal (value) // (comm.) prodotti principali, staples (o staple commodities)◆ s.m. ( datore di lavoro) employer; ( capo d'azienda) principal; ( direttore) manager; ( padrone) master, (fam.) boss.* * *[printʃi'pale]1. agg(strada, motivo) main, principal, (opera) majorproposizione principale Gramm — main clause
2. sm/ffam boss* * *[printʃi'pale] 1.1) main, principal, primary; [bisogno, fatto, tema] basic, principal; [ ruolo] central; [ ragione] principal, chief; [fattore, candidato, sospetto] primevia, entrata principale — main street, entrance
sede principale — head office, headquarters
2.ruolo principale — lead o leading role; teatr. title role, name part
sostantivo maschile e sostantivo femminile (capo) boss, head* * *principale/print∫i'pale/1 main, principal, primary; [bisogno, fatto, tema] basic, principal; [ ruolo] central; [ ragione] principal, chief; [fattore, candidato, sospetto] prime; via, entrata principale main street, entrance; sede principale head office, headquarters; ruolo principale lead o leading role; teatr. title role, name partII m. e f.(capo) boss, head. -
62 Главное значение аргумента комплексного числа
Русско-английский словарь по прикладной математике и механике > Главное значение аргумента комплексного числа
-
63 иск
сущ.action; claim; (civil) complaint; lawsuit; plea; suitвозбуждать (подавать, предъявлять) иск — to bring (commence, enter, file, lay, maintain, start) an action (a charge, suit) ( against); claim; institute (lodge, make, prosecute) a claim ( against); institute (take) a legal action (proceeding|s) ( against); lodge (make) a complaint ( against); prosecute; sue
возражать против иска (оспаривать иск) — to challenge (contest, dispute) a claim; ( no существу) to traverse an action (a claim)
отвечать по иску — to be sued; defend a suit; ( из гражданского правонарушения) to be liable (be sued) in tort; ( из противоправного удержания вещи) to be sued in detinue
отказать в иске (отклонить иск) — to deny (disallow, dismiss, reject) a case (a lawsuit)
отказываться от иска (отзывать иск) — to abandon (drop, forgo, give up, release, relinquish, renounce, waive, withdraw) an action (a claim, suit)
поддерживать иск — ( в суде) to hold an action; sustain a case (a claim)
предъявлять встречный иск — to counterclaim; countersue
предъявлять иск о диффамации — to file a defamation suit ( against); sue for defamation
предъявлять иск, основанный на деликте — to sue in tort
предъявлять иск, основанный на договоре — to sue in contract
удовлетворять иск — to accept (allow, comply with, meet) a claim; pronounce a judgement for the plaintiff; redress (satisfy) a claim
обоснование иска — argument in support of an action; foundation of an action
отказ в иске (отклонение иска —) condemnation; dismissal of an action (of a case / lawsuit)
отказ от иска (прекращение иска) — abandonment (abatement, renunciation, waiver, withdrawal) of an action (of a claim, suit)
предъявление иска — commencement (institution) of a legal action (proceeding|s) ( against); filing of a suit ( against)
признание иска — ( претензии) recognition of a claim
удовлетворение иска — allowance (redress, satisfaction) of a claim
иск из гражданского правонарушения — action (claim) in (of) tort; tort (tortious) action (claim)
иск на небольшую сумму, иск на незначительную сумму — small claim
иск о взыскании убытков, иск о возмещении убытков — action (claim) for damages; damages; legal action for recovery
иск о нарушении Конституции, иск о конституционных прав — constitutional action (claim, suit)
иск о нарушении патента, иск о патентных прав — пат claim for (of) infringement
иск о недобросовестной юридической практике — action (claim, suit) for (of) legal malpractice
иск о недобросовестном исполнении — (своих обязательств, обязанностей и т.п.) bad-faith action (claim, suit)
иск о несправедливом увольнении с работы — action (claim, suit) for (of) unfair dismissal
иск о неэффективности услуг адвоката — ineffectiveness of counsel action (claim, suit)
- иск за оскорбление действиемиск о причинении личного вреда, иск о причинении личного ущерба — personal injury action (claim, suit)
- иск из договора
- иск из нарушения владения
- иск об изменении правоотношений
- иск о возврате владения
- иск о дискриминации
- иск о диффамации
- иск о мошенничестве
- иск о нарушении договора
- иск о незаконном выселении
- иск о признании недействительным
- иск о признании прав
- иск о разводе
- иск о сексуальном домогательстве
- иск, основанный на законе
- вещный иск
- виндикационный иск
- встречный иск - имущественный иск
- ложный иск
- обязательственный иск
- посессорный иск
- раздельные иски
- регрессивный иск
- совместный иск
- судебный иск -
64 теоретический
1. speculative2. academic3. perfect4. theoretic5. theoreticalСинонимический ряд:абстрактный (прил.) абстрактный; метафизический; отвлеченный; спекулятивный; умозрительный -
65 Computers
The brain has been compared to a digital computer because the neuron, like a switch or valve, either does or does not complete a circuit. But at that point the similarity ends. The switch in the digital computer is constant in its effect, and its effect is large in proportion to the total output of the machine. The effect produced by the neuron varies with its recovery from [the] refractory phase and with its metabolic state. The number of neurons involved in any action runs into millions so that the influence of any one is negligible.... Any cell in the system can be dispensed with.... The brain is an analogical machine, not digital. Analysis of the integrative activities will probably have to be in statistical terms. (Lashley, quoted in Beach, Hebb, Morgan & Nissen, 1960, p. 539)It is essential to realize that a computer is not a mere "number cruncher," or supercalculating arithmetic machine, although this is how computers are commonly regarded by people having no familiarity with artificial intelligence. Computers do not crunch numbers; they manipulate symbols.... Digital computers originally developed with mathematical problems in mind, are in fact general purpose symbol manipulating machines....The terms "computer" and "computation" are themselves unfortunate, in view of their misleading arithmetical connotations. The definition of artificial intelligence previously cited-"the study of intelligence as computation"-does not imply that intelligence is really counting. Intelligence may be defined as the ability creatively to manipulate symbols, or process information, given the requirements of the task in hand. (Boden, 1981, pp. 15, 16-17)The task is to get computers to explain things to themselves, to ask questions about their experiences so as to cause those explanations to be forthcoming, and to be creative in coming up with explanations that have not been previously available. (Schank, 1986, p. 19)In What Computers Can't Do, written in 1969 (2nd edition, 1972), the main objection to AI was the impossibility of using rules to select only those facts about the real world that were relevant in a given situation. The "Introduction" to the paperback edition of the book, published by Harper & Row in 1979, pointed out further that no one had the slightest idea how to represent the common sense understanding possessed even by a four-year-old. (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1986, p. 102)A popular myth says that the invention of the computer diminishes our sense of ourselves, because it shows that rational thought is not special to human beings, but can be carried on by a mere machine. It is a short stop from there to the conclusion that intelligence is mechanical, which many people find to be an affront to all that is most precious and singular about their humanness.In fact, the computer, early in its career, was not an instrument of the philistines, but a humanizing influence. It helped to revive an idea that had fallen into disrepute: the idea that the mind is real, that it has an inner structure and a complex organization, and can be understood in scientific terms. For some three decades, until the 1940s, American psychology had lain in the grip of the ice age of behaviorism, which was antimental through and through. During these years, extreme behaviorists banished the study of thought from their agenda. Mind and consciousness, thinking, imagining, planning, solving problems, were dismissed as worthless for anything except speculation. Only the external aspects of behavior, the surface manifestations, were grist for the scientist's mill, because only they could be observed and measured....It is one of the surprising gifts of the computer in the history of ideas that it played a part in giving back to psychology what it had lost, which was nothing less than the mind itself. In particular, there was a revival of interest in how the mind represents the world internally to itself, by means of knowledge structures such as ideas, symbols, images, and inner narratives, all of which had been consigned to the realm of mysticism. (Campbell, 1989, p. 10)[Our artifacts] only have meaning because we give it to them; their intentionality, like that of smoke signals and writing, is essentially borrowed, hence derivative. To put it bluntly: computers themselves don't mean anything by their tokens (any more than books do)-they only mean what we say they do. Genuine understanding, on the other hand, is intentional "in its own right" and not derivatively from something else. (Haugeland, 1981a, pp. 32-33)he debate over the possibility of computer thought will never be won or lost; it will simply cease to be of interest, like the previous debate over man as a clockwork mechanism. (Bolter, 1984, p. 190)t takes us a long time to emotionally digest a new idea. The computer is too big a step, and too recently made, for us to quickly recover our balance and gauge its potential. It's an enormous accelerator, perhaps the greatest one since the plow, twelve thousand years ago. As an intelligence amplifier, it speeds up everything-including itself-and it continually improves because its heart is information or, more plainly, ideas. We can no more calculate its consequences than Babbage could have foreseen antibiotics, the Pill, or space stations.Further, the effects of those ideas are rapidly compounding, because a computer design is itself just a set of ideas. As we get better at manipulating ideas by building ever better computers, we get better at building even better computers-it's an ever-escalating upward spiral. The early nineteenth century, when the computer's story began, is already so far back that it may as well be the Stone Age. (Rawlins, 1997, p. 19)According to weak AI, the principle value of the computer in the study of the mind is that it gives us a very powerful tool. For example, it enables us to formulate and test hypotheses in a more rigorous and precise fashion than before. But according to strong AI the computer is not merely a tool in the study of the mind; rather the appropriately programmed computer really is a mind in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states. And according to strong AI, because the programmed computer has cognitive states, the programs are not mere tools that enable us to test psychological explanations; rather, the programs are themselves the explanations. (Searle, 1981b, p. 353)What makes people smarter than machines? They certainly are not quicker or more precise. Yet people are far better at perceiving objects in natural scenes and noting their relations, at understanding language and retrieving contextually appropriate information from memory, at making plans and carrying out contextually appropriate actions, and at a wide range of other natural cognitive tasks. People are also far better at learning to do these things more accurately and fluently through processing experience.What is the basis for these differences? One answer, perhaps the classic one we might expect from artificial intelligence, is "software." If we only had the right computer program, the argument goes, we might be able to capture the fluidity and adaptability of human information processing. Certainly this answer is partially correct. There have been great breakthroughs in our understanding of cognition as a result of the development of expressive high-level computer languages and powerful algorithms. However, we do not think that software is the whole story.In our view, people are smarter than today's computers because the brain employs a basic computational architecture that is more suited to deal with a central aspect of the natural information processing tasks that people are so good at.... hese tasks generally require the simultaneous consideration of many pieces of information or constraints. Each constraint may be imperfectly specified and ambiguous, yet each can play a potentially decisive role in determining the outcome of processing. (McClelland, Rumelhart & Hinton, 1986, pp. 3-4)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Computers
См. также в других словарях:
Argument — Ar gu*ment, n. [F. argument, L. argumentum, fr. arguere to argue.] 1. Proof; evidence. [Obs.] [1913 Webster] There is.. no more palpable and convincing argument of the existence of a Deity. Ray. [1913 Webster] Why, then, is it made a badge of wit … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Value theory — encompasses a range of approaches to understanding how, why and to what degree people should value things; whether the thing is a person, idea, object, or anything else. This investigation began in ancient philosophy, where it is called axiology… … Wikipedia
Value added — refers to the additional value of a commodity over the cost of commodities used to produce it from the previous stage of production. An example is the price of gasoline at the pump over the price of the oil in it. In national accounts used in… … Wikipedia
Value — Val ue, n. [OF. value, fr. valoir, p. p. valu, to be worth, fr. L. valere to be strong, to be worth. See {Valiant}.] 1. The property or aggregate properties of a thing by which it is rendered useful or desirable, or the degree of such property or … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Value received — Value Val ue, n. [OF. value, fr. valoir, p. p. valu, to be worth, fr. L. valere to be strong, to be worth. See {Valiant}.] 1. The property or aggregate properties of a thing by which it is rendered useful or desirable, or the degree of such… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
Value averaging — Value averaging, also known as dollar value averaging (DVA), is a technique of adding to an investment portfolio to provide greater return than similar methods such as dollar cost averaging and random investment. It was developed by former… … Wikipedia
Value Added Tax-free Exports from the Channel Islands — are exports of goods from the Channel Islands on which value added tax (VAT) is not levied. In recent years, companies in the United Kingdom have expressed concern at the competition thereby offered to their goods on which VAT is… … Wikipedia
Argument (complex analysis) — Arg (mathematics) redirects here. For argument of a function, see Argument of a function. Figure 1. This Argand diagram represents the complex numbers lying on a plane. For each point on the plane, arg is the function which returns the angle φ.… … Wikipedia
Argument — This article is about the subject as it is studied in logic and philosophy. For other uses, see Argument (disambiguation). In philosophy and logic, an argument is an attempt to persuade someone of something, by giving reasons or evidence for… … Wikipedia
Value criterion — In Lincoln Douglas Debate, the value criterion (criterion, VC, or standard) is the means of weighing the value premise. Unlike the value premise, the value criterion is often swayed to either the affirmative or negative side. It can be shortened… … Wikipedia
Argument from ignorance — The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ( appeal to ignorance [ [http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/ignorance.html Argumentum ad Ignorantiam ] ] ) or argument by lack of imagination, is a logical fallacy in which it… … Wikipedia