-
21 remark
1. IIremark in some manner as the author of this book rightly /justly/ remarks как справедливо отмечает автор этой книги2. XIbe remarked it may be remarked that... можно заметить, что...; be remarked somewhere as remarked above как отмечено /сказано, упомянуто/ выше; be remarked at some time this point has often been remarked upon на этом вопросе часто сосредотачивали внимание3. XVIremark (up)on smth. remark (up)on an event (on smb.'s behaviour, on their similarity, etc.) делать замечание о каком-л. событии и т.д.; he remarked on her appearance он сделал замечание по поводу ее наружности; I remarked upon it to my neighbour я сказал об этом своему соседу; you remember that I remarked upon it помните, я говорил об этом4. XXVremark that... remark that it was getting late (that it had suddenly grown cold, that she needed a wash, that it looked strange, etc.) отмечать /замечать/, что уже поздно и т.д.; he remarked that he would be absent the next day он заметил, что его завтра не будет; I remarked before that opinions differ on this point я уже указывал раньше, что по этому вопросу мнения расходятся; allow me (I should like, etc.) to remark that... позвольте мне и т.д. заметить, что... abs "I thought you had gone" ("I shall be there", "There are many of them", etc.), he remarked calmly (casually, wittily, laughingly, etc.) "Я думал, что вы уже ушли" и т.д., remark спокойно и т.д. заметил /сказал/ он; "Never mind", my friend remarked drily "He стоит беспокоиться",- сухо сказал мой друг -
22 simulacrum
подобие имя существительное: -
23 simulacra
симулякры имя существительное: -
24 difference
1. n разница; различие, несходство, отличиеdifference of opinion — расхождение во мнениях, разногласия
the difference between two versions of the same text — различие между двумя редакциями одного и того же текста, разночтение
with the difference that … — с той разницей, что …
2. n разногласие; спор; ссораwe sometimes have our differences — у нас бывают разногласия, нам случается не соглашаться друг с другом
3. n геральд. отличительный знак4. n мат. разность5. v книжн. различать; отличать6. v книжн. мат. вычислять разностьСинонимический ряд:1. argument (noun) argument; disagreement; dispute; quarrel2. discord (noun) conflict; contention; disaccord; discord; disharmony; dispeace; dissension; dissent; dissidence; dissonance; disunion; disunity; inharmony; mischief; strife; unpeace3. dissimilarity (noun) alterity; deviation; discrepancy; disparity; dissemblance; dissimilarity; dissimilitude; distance; divarication; divergence; divergency; gap; incongruity; inconsistency; otherness; unlikeness4. distinction (noun) dash; discrimination; distinction; idiosyncrasy; tone5. variance (noun) contrariety; division; feud; misunderstanding; opposition; variance6. variation (noun) contrast; variation7. know (verb) differentiate; discern; discrepate; discriminate; distinguish; extricate; know; separate; sever; severalizeАнтонимический ряд:agreement; amity; assent; community; concurrence; congruity; consent; consonance; harmony; identity; likeness; similarity; sympathy -
25 likeness
1. n сходство; подобие2. n портрет; фотографияspeaking likeness — живой портрет ;
3. n арх. поэт. видимость, вид, образСинонимический ряд:1. affinity (noun) affinity; alikeness; analogy; comparison; congruence; correspondence; resemblance; similarity; simile; similitude2. image (noun) copy; image; replica3. representation (noun) effigy; facsimile; picture; portrait; representation4. semblance (noun) appearance; guise; semblanceАнтонимический ряд:contrast; original -
26 of
of [əv, stressed ɒv](a) (after nouns expressing quantity, number, amount) de;∎ a pound of onions une livre d'oignons;∎ a loaf of bread un pain;∎ a piece of cake un morceau de gâteau;∎ a bottle of wine une bouteille de vin;∎ a pair of trousers un pantalon;∎ there are six of us nous sommes six;∎ thousands of mosquitos des milliers de moustiques;∎ some/many/few of us were present quelques-uns/beaucoup/peu d'entre nous étaient présents;∎ half of them failed la moitié d'entre eux ont échoué;∎ how much of it do you want? combien en voulez-vous?(b) (indicating age) de;∎ a boy/a girl of three un garçon/une fille de trois ans;∎ at the age of nineteen à dix-neuf ans, à l'âge de dix-neuf ans;∎ his wife of twenty years la femme avec qui il est marié depuis vingt ans(c) (indicating composition, content) de;∎ a photo of Lily une photo de Lily;∎ a map of Spain une carte d'Espagne;∎ a report of events in Parliament un compte rendu de ce qui se passe au Parlement;∎ a rise of 25 percent une augmentation de 25 pour cent;∎ a team of cricketers une équipe de cricket;∎ a city of 120,000 une ville de 120 000 habitants;∎ a series of programmes on Italy une série d'émissions sur l'Italie(d) (created by) de;∎ the poems of Byron les poèmes de Byron∎ I'm ashamed of it j'en ai honte;∎ I'm proud of it j'en suis fier;∎ familiar I'm sick of it j'en ai assez;∎ I'm afraid of the dark j'ai peur du noir;∎ she dreamt of one day becoming Prime Minister elle rêvait de devenir Premier ministre un jour;∎ I have no intention of leaving je n'ai aucune intention de partir;∎ the fear of God la crainte de Dieu(f) (indicating possession, relationship) de;∎ he's a friend of mine c'est un ami à moi;∎ a friend of mine saw me un de mes amis m'a vu;∎ I'd like a home of my own j'aimerais avoir mon chez-moi;∎ the corner of the street le coin de la rue;∎ the subject of the lecture le sujet du cours;∎ cancer of the bowel cancer des intestins;∎ the love of a mother l'amour d'une mère;∎ the rights of man les droits de l'homme;∎ she's head of department elle est chef de service;∎ doctor of medicine docteur en médecine∎ it was kind/mean of him c'était gentil/méchant de sa part;∎ how clever of her comme c'est intelligent de sa part∎ the city of New York la ville de New York;∎ the people of Chile le peuple ou les habitants du Chili;∎ the University of Cambridge l'université de Cambridge;∎ the village of Carlton le village de Carlton∎ the arrival/departure of Flight 556 l'arrivée/le départ du vol 556;∎ we need the approval of the committee nous devons obtenir l'autorisation du comité;∎ a lover of fine wine un amateur de bons vins;∎ the success of the meeting le succès de la réunion;∎ an outbreak of cholera une épidémie de choléra∎ a feeling of relief un sentiment de soulagement;∎ she has the gift of mimicry elle a un talent d'imitatrice;∎ a man of courage un homme de courage;∎ people of foreign appearance gens à l'air étranger;∎ a coat of many colours un manteau multicolore;∎ a sort or kind or type of tree un type d'arbre;∎ formal to be of sound mind être sain d'esprit;∎ to be of a nervous disposition avoir une prédisposition à la nervosité;∎ that fool of a sergeant cet imbécile de sergent∎ a ring of solid gold une bague en or massif;∎ a heart of stone un cœur de pierre;∎ made of wood fait de ou en bois(l) (after nouns of size, measurement etc) de;∎ a width/length of sixty feet une largeur/longueur de soixante pieds;∎ they reach a height of ten feet ils atteignent une hauteur de dix pieds(m) (indicating cause, origin, source) de;∎ the consequence/the effects of the explosion la conséquence/les effets de l'explosion;∎ to die of cancer mourir du ou d'un cancer;∎ of royal descent de lignée royale;∎ of which/whom dont(n) (indicating likeness, similarity) de;∎ the colour of blood/of grass la couleur du sang/de l'herbe;∎ the size of a tennis ball de la taille d'une balle de tennis;∎ he reminds me of John Wayne il me rappelle John Wayne;∎ it smells of coffee ça sent le café;∎ a giant of a man un homme très grand;∎ a huge barn of a house une énorme bâtisse∎ the 3rd of May le 3 mai;∎ in the middle of August à la mi-août;∎ the crash of 1929 le krach de 1929;∎ the day of our wedding le jour de notre mariage;∎ it was the high point of the week ça a été le point culminant de la semaine;∎ American a quarter of nine neuf heures moins le quart;∎ in the middle of the road au milieu de la chaussée;∎ at the far end of the room à l'autre bout de la pièce;∎ south of au sud de;∎ within a mile of à moins d'un mil(l)e de∎ a lack of food un manque de nourriture;∎ to get rid of sth se débarrasser de qch;∎ to be cured of sth être guéri de qch;∎ to rob sb of sth voler qch à qn∎ I've never heard of him je n'ai jamais entendu parler de lui;∎ to learn of sth apprendre qch;∎ her knowledge of French sa connaissance du français;∎ of President Nixon it was said that… il a été dit du président Nixon que…∎ the best/the worst of all le meilleur/le pire de tout;∎ today of all days! il fallait que ça arrive aujourd'hui!;∎ he, of all men or people lui entre tous;∎ you, of all people, should know… toi, plus que quiconque, devrais savoir que…∎ or humorous I like to listen to the radio of a morning/an evening j'aime écouter la radio le matin/le soir -
27 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
similarity — noun ADJECTIVE ▪ close, considerable, great, remarkable, strong ▪ the close similarity in our ages ▪ clear, marked … Collocations dictionary
similarity — I (New American Roget s College Thesaurus) Resemblance Nouns 1. similarity, resemblance, likeness, similitude, semblance; affinity, approximation, parallelism; agreement; analogy; family likeness; alliteration, rhyme, pun. See imitation, nearness … English dictionary for students
similarity — similar ► ADJECTIVE 1) of the same kind in appearance, character, or quantity, without being identical. 2) (of geometrical figures) having the same angles and proportions, though of different sizes. DERIVATIVES similarity noun similarly adverb.… … English terms dictionary
similarity — noun a) Closeness of appearance to something else. b) The relation of sharing properties. Syn: resemblance See Also: similar … Wiktionary
Substantial similarity — Intellectual property law Primary rights Copyright · authors rights … Wikipedia
Cosine similarity — is a measure of similarity between two vectors by measuring the cosine of the angle between them. The cosine of 0 is 1, and less than 1 for any other angle. The cosine of the angle between two vectors thus determines whether two vectors are… … Wikipedia
self-similarity — noun Date: 1967 the quality or state of having an appearance that is invariant upon being scaled larger or smaller < magnify the fractal and you can see the self similarity of its edge > • self similar adjective … New Collegiate Dictionary
mimicry — similarity of appearance between two species, the mimic gaining protection from resembling a dangerous organism such as a predator or poisonous organism (Batesian mimicry) or where both species are protected against predators by being distasteful … Dictionary of ichthyology
evolution — evolutional, adj. evolutionally, adv. /ev euh looh sheuhn/ or, esp. Brit., /ee veuh /, n. 1. any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane. 2. a product of such development; something… … Universalium
mimicry — /mim ik ree/, n., pl. mimicries. 1. the act, practice, or art of mimicking. 2. Biol. the close external resemblance of an organism, the mimic, to some different organism, the model, such that the mimic benefits from the mistaken identity, as… … Universalium
likeness — likeness, similarity, resemblance, similitude, analogy, affinity are comparable when they denote agreement or correspondence or an instance of agreement or correspondence in details (as of appearance, structure, or qualities) brought out by a… … New Dictionary of Synonyms