Перевод: со всех языков на английский

с английского на все языки

mechanical+power

  • 101 Stephenson, George

    [br]
    b. 9 June 1781 Wylam, Northumberland, England
    d. 12 August 1848 Tapton House, Chesterfield, England
    [br]
    English engineer, "the father of railways".
    [br]
    George Stephenson was the son of the fireman of the pumping engine at Wylam colliery, and horses drew wagons of coal along the wooden rails of the Wylam wagonway past the house in which he was born and spent his earliest childhood. While still a child he worked as a cowherd, but soon moved to working at coal pits. At 17 years of age he showed sufficient mechanical talent to be placed in charge of a new pumping engine, and had already achieved a job more responsible than that of his father. Despite his position he was still illiterate, although he subsequently learned to read and write. He was largely self-educated.
    In 1801 he was appointed Brakesman of the winding engine at Black Callerton pit, with responsibility for lowering the miners safely to their work. Then, about two years later, he became Brakesman of a new winding engine erected by Robert Hawthorn at Willington Quay on the Tyne. Returning collier brigs discharged ballast into wagons and the engine drew the wagons up an inclined plane to the top of "Ballast Hill" for their contents to be tipped; this was one of the earliest applications of steam power to transport, other than experimentally.
    In 1804 Stephenson moved to West Moor pit, Killingworth, again as Brakesman. In 1811 he demonstrated his mechanical skill by successfully modifying a new and unsatisfactory atmospheric engine, a task that had defeated the efforts of others, to enable it to pump a drowned pit clear of water. The following year he was appointed Enginewright at Killingworth, in charge of the machinery in all the collieries of the "Grand Allies", the prominent coal-owning families of Wortley, Liddell and Bowes, with authorization also to work for others. He built many stationary engines and he closely examined locomotives of John Blenkinsop's type on the Kenton \& Coxlodge wagonway, as well as those of William Hedley at Wylam.
    It was in 1813 that Sir Thomas Liddell requested George Stephenson to build a steam locomotive for the Killingworth wagonway: Blucher made its first trial run on 25 July 1814 and was based on Blenkinsop's locomotives, although it lacked their rack-and-pinion drive. George Stephenson is credited with building the first locomotive both to run on edge rails and be driven by adhesion, an arrangement that has been the conventional one ever since. Yet Blucher was far from perfect and over the next few years, while other engineers ignored the steam locomotive, Stephenson built a succession of them, each an improvement on the last.
    During this period many lives were lost in coalmines from explosions of gas ignited by miners' lamps. By observation and experiment (sometimes at great personal risk) Stephenson invented a satisfactory safety lamp, working independently of the noted scientist Sir Humphry Davy who also invented such a lamp around the same time.
    In 1817 George Stephenson designed his first locomotive for an outside customer, the Kilmarnock \& Troon Railway, and in 1819 he laid out the Hetton Colliery Railway in County Durham, for which his brother Robert was Resident Engineer. This was the first railway to be worked entirely without animal traction: it used inclined planes with stationary engines, self-acting inclined planes powered by gravity, and locomotives.
    On 19 April 1821 Stephenson was introduced to Edward Pease, one of the main promoters of the Stockton \& Darlington Railway (S \& DR), which by coincidence received its Act of Parliament the same day. George Stephenson carried out a further survey, to improve the proposed line, and in this he was assisted by his 18-year-old son, Robert Stephenson, whom he had ensured received the theoretical education which he himself lacked. It is doubtful whether either could have succeeded without the other; together they were to make the steam railway practicable.
    At George Stephenson's instance, much of the S \& DR was laid with wrought-iron rails recently developed by John Birkinshaw at Bedlington Ironworks, Morpeth. These were longer than cast-iron rails and were not brittle: they made a track well suited for locomotives. In June 1823 George and Robert Stephenson, with other partners, founded a firm in Newcastle upon Tyne to build locomotives and rolling stock and to do general engineering work: after its Managing Partner, the firm was called Robert Stephenson \& Co.
    In 1824 the promoters of the Liverpool \& Manchester Railway (L \& MR) invited George Stephenson to resurvey their proposed line in order to reduce opposition to it. William James, a wealthy land agent who had become a visionary protagonist of a national railway network and had seen Stephenson's locomotives at Killingworth, had promoted the L \& MR with some merchants of Liverpool and had carried out the first survey; however, he overreached himself in business and, shortly after the invitation to Stephenson, became bankrupt. In his own survey, however, George Stephenson lacked the assistance of his son Robert, who had left for South America, and he delegated much of the detailed work to incompetent assistants. During a devastating Parliamentary examination in the spring of 1825, much of his survey was shown to be seriously inaccurate and the L \& MR's application for an Act of Parliament was refused. The railway's promoters discharged Stephenson and had their line surveyed yet again, by C.B. Vignoles.
    The Stockton \& Darlington Railway was, however, triumphantly opened in the presence of vast crowds in September 1825, with Stephenson himself driving the locomotive Locomotion, which had been built at Robert Stephenson \& Co.'s Newcastle works. Once the railway was at work, horse-drawn and gravity-powered traffic shared the line with locomotives: in 1828 Stephenson invented the horse dandy, a wagon at the back of a train in which a horse could travel over the gravity-operated stretches, instead of trotting behind.
    Meanwhile, in May 1826, the Liverpool \& Manchester Railway had successfully obtained its Act of Parliament. Stephenson was appointed Engineer in June, and since he and Vignoles proved incompatible the latter left early in 1827. The railway was built by Stephenson and his staff, using direct labour. A considerable controversy arose c. 1828 over the motive power to be used: the traffic anticipated was too great for horses, but the performance of the reciprocal system of cable haulage developed by Benjamin Thompson appeared in many respects superior to that of contemporary locomotives. The company instituted a prize competition for a better locomotive and the Rainhill Trials were held in October 1829.
    Robert Stephenson had been working on improved locomotive designs since his return from America in 1827, but it was the L \& MR's Treasurer, Henry Booth, who suggested the multi-tubular boiler to George Stephenson. This was incorporated into a locomotive built by Robert Stephenson for the trials: Rocket was entered by the three men in partnership. The other principal entrants were Novelty, entered by John Braithwaite and John Ericsson, and Sans Pareil, entered by Timothy Hackworth, but only Rocket, driven by George Stephenson, met all the organizers' demands; indeed, it far surpassed them and demonstrated the practicability of the long-distance steam railway. With the opening of the Liverpool \& Manchester Railway in 1830, the age of railways began.
    Stephenson was active in many aspects. He advised on the construction of the Belgian State Railway, of which the Brussels-Malines section, opened in 1835, was the first all-steam railway on the European continent. In England, proposals to link the L \& MR with the Midlands had culminated in an Act of Parliament for the Grand Junction Railway in 1833: this was to run from Warrington, which was already linked to the L \& MR, to Birmingham. George Stephenson had been in charge of the surveys, and for the railway's construction he and J.U. Rastrick were initially Principal Engineers, with Stephenson's former pupil Joseph Locke under them; by 1835 both Stephenson and Rastrick had withdrawn and Locke was Engineer-in-Chief. Stephenson remained much in demand elsewhere: he was particularly associated with the construction of the North Midland Railway (Derby to Leeds) and related lines. He was active in many other places and carried out, for instance, preliminary surveys for the Chester \& Holyhead and Newcastle \& Berwick Railways, which were important links in the lines of communication between London and, respectively, Dublin and Edinburgh.
    He eventually retired to Tapton House, Chesterfield, overlooking the North Midland. A man who was self-made (with great success) against colossal odds, he was ever reluctant, regrettably, to give others their due credit, although in retirement, immensely wealthy and full of honour, he was still able to mingle with people of all ranks.
    [br]
    Principal Honours and Distinctions
    President, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, on its formation in 1847. Order of Leopold (Belgium) 1835. Stephenson refused both a knighthood and Fellowship of the Royal Society.
    Bibliography
    1815, jointly with Ralph Dodd, British patent no. 3,887 (locomotive drive by connecting rods directly to the wheels).
    1817, jointly with William Losh, British patent no. 4,067 (steam springs for locomotives, and improvements to track).
    Further Reading
    L.T.C.Rolt, 1960, George and Robert Stephenson, Longman (the best modern biography; includes a bibliography).
    S.Smiles, 1874, The Lives of George and Robert Stephenson, rev. edn, London (although sycophantic, this is probably the best nineteenthcentury biography).
    PJGR

    Biographical history of technology > Stephenson, George

  • 102 механическая подача

    1) Engineering: power-operated feed
    2) Railway term: worm feeder
    4) Mechanics: power traverse
    5) Coolers: mechanical feed
    6) Drilling: positive feed

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > механическая подача

  • 103 pala mecánica

    f.
    power shovel, spader, mechanical shovel, steam shovel.
    * * *
    * * *
    * * *
    mechanical shovel

    Spanish-English dictionary > pala mecánica

  • 104 энергия

    energy, power
    * * *
    эне́ргия ж.
    1. energy
    выводи́ть эне́ргию (из ла́зера) диффракцио́нным ме́тодом — couple out the laser output by diffraction
    выделя́ть [высвобожда́ть] эне́ргию — give off [give out, liberate, release] energy
    нака́пливать эне́ргию — accumulate [store] energy
    отбира́ть эне́ргию — extract energy
    передава́ть эне́ргию ( от одного тела к другому) — transfer energy (from one body to another)
    поглоща́ть эне́ргию — absorb energy
    подводи́ть эне́ргию к … — deliver energy to …
    превраща́ть эне́ргию ( из одного вида в другой) — convert energy (from one to another)
    приобрета́ть эне́ргию — acquire energy
    сообща́ть эне́ргию — energize
    2. (нестрогое или прикладное словоупотребление, особ. в народном хозяйстве) power
    выраба́тывать [производи́ть] эне́ргию — generate [produce] power
    запаса́ть эне́ргию — accumulate [store] power
    передава́ть эне́ргию (особ. электрическую) на расстоя́ние — transmit power (especially electric) over a distance
    преобразо́вывать эне́ргию — convert power
    распредели́ть эне́ргию — distribute power
    снабжа́ть эне́ргией — supply power
    эне́ргия адсо́рбции — adsorption energy
    эне́ргия актива́ции — activation energy
    а́томная эне́ргия
    1. atomic energy
    2. nuclear power
    взаи́мная эне́ргия — mutual energy
    эне́ргия взаимоде́йствия ( частиц) — interaction energy
    эне́ргия взаимообме́на — exchange energy
    вну́тренняя эне́ргия — internal energy
    внутрия́дерная эне́ргия — nuclear [atomic] energy
    во́дная эне́ргия — water [hydroelectric] power
    эне́ргия возбужде́ния ( атомов) — excitation energy
    эне́ргия враще́ния — rotation energy
    гидравли́ческая эне́ргия — hydraulic power
    гравитацио́нная эне́ргия — gravitational energy
    эне́ргия деле́ния ( ядра) — fission energy
    эне́ргия деформа́ции — strain energy
    эне́ргия дисперсио́нного взаимоде́йствия — dispersion energy
    эне́ргия диссоциа́ции — dissociation energy
    звукова́я эне́ргия — acoustic [sound] energy
    избы́точная эне́ргия — excess [extra] energy
    излуча́емая эне́ргия — radiant energy
    эне́ргия иониза́ции — ionization energy
    кинети́ческая эне́ргия — kinetic energy
    кинети́ческая эне́ргия враще́ния — angular kinetic energy
    кинети́ческая, уде́льная эне́ргия пото́ка — kinetic energy of the fluid flow per unit volume
    эне́ргия колеба́ний — vibrational [vibratory] energy
    корреляцио́нная эне́ргия — correlation energy
    косми́ческая эне́ргия — cosmic energy
    крити́ческая эне́ргия — critical energy
    эне́ргия куло́новского взаимоде́йствия — Coloumb energy
    лучи́стая эне́ргия — radiant energy
    магни́тная эне́ргия — magnetic field energy
    эне́ргия магни́тного по́ля — magnetic field energy
    магнитоупру́гая эне́ргия — magnetoelastic energy
    эне́ргия межмолекуля́рного взаимоде́йствия — intermolecular [molecular interaction] energy
    механи́ческая эне́ргия — mechanical energy
    нулева́я эне́ргия — zero-point energy
    эне́ргия нулево́й то́чки — zero-point energy
    обме́нная эне́ргия — exchange energy
    эне́ргия обме́нного взаимоде́йствия — exchange energy
    орбита́льная эне́ргия — orbital energy
    оста́точная эне́ргия — residual energy
    эне́ргия отда́чи — recoil energy
    эне́ргия отта́лкивания — repulsive [repulsion] energy
    эне́ргия перехо́да — transition energy
    пове́рхностная эне́ргия — surface energy
    пове́рхностная эне́ргия разруше́ния рез.fracture surface energy
    эне́ргия пове́рхностного натяже́ния — capillary energy
    эне́ргия поко́я ( частицы) — rest energy
    эне́ргия по́ля анизотропи́и — anisotropy energy
    поро́говая эне́ргия — threshold energy
    эне́ргия поступа́тельного движе́ния — translational [translatory] energy
    потенциа́льная эне́ргия — potential energy
    потенциа́льная эне́ргия деформа́ции — strain energy
    потребля́емая эне́ргия
    1. energy input
    2. power consumption
    эне́ргия притяже́ния — attraction energy
    промежу́точная эне́ргия — intermediate energy
    эне́ргия пучка́ — beam energy
    эне́ргия радиоизлуче́ния — radio(-frequency) energy
    эне́ргия разруше́ния горн.crushing energy
    эне́ргия разруше́ния уде́льная горн.specific crushing energy
    эне́ргия разры́ва, уста́лостная — fatigue tensile energy
    эне́ргия распа́да — decay [disintegration] energy
    резона́нсная эне́ргия — resonance [resonant] energy
    эне́ргия ро́ста — growing capacity
    светова́я эне́ргия — luminous [light] energy
    свобо́дная эне́ргия — free [available] energy
    свя́занная эне́ргия — bound [unavailable] energy
    эне́ргия свя́зи — binding energy
    скры́тая эне́ргия — latent energy
    эне́ргия смеше́ния — energy of mixing
    со́бственная эне́ргия — self-energy
    со́лнечная эне́ргия
    1. solar energy
    2. solar power
    эне́ргия состоя́ния — energy of state
    эне́ргия столкнове́ний — collision(al) energy
    теплова́я эне́ргия
    1. heat [thermal] energy
    2. thermal power
    эне́ргия теплово́го движе́ния — thermal-motion energy
    термоя́дерная эне́ргия — thermonuclear power
    эне́ргия уда́ра — impact energy
    уде́льная эне́ргия — specific energy
    упру́гая эне́ргия — elastic (strain) energy
    эне́ргия упру́гой деформа́ции — strain energy
    эне́ргия фото́на — photon energy
    хими́ческая эне́ргия — chemical energy
    электри́ческая эне́ргия
    1. electric energy
    2. electric power
    эне́ргия электри́ческого по́ля — electrical field energy
    электромагни́тная эне́ргия — electromagnetic energy
    эне́ргия электромагни́тного по́ля — electromagnetic energy
    электростати́ческая эне́ргия — electrostatic energy
    эне́ргия электростати́ческого взаимоде́йствия — electrostatic energy
    я́дерная эне́ргия — nuclear power

    Русско-английский политехнический словарь > энергия

  • 105 moto-

    moto- pref. di formazione moderna, che è abbreviazione di motore; indica
    1 macchine, veicoli azionati da un motore; ingl. motor (-), power, powered, engine-driven: motoaliante, power glider; motobarca, motorboat; motocarrello, power truck; motocisterna, motor tanker; motozappa, engine-driven cultivator
    2 impiego di veicoli a motore o mezzi meccanici; ingl. motor, motorized, mechanical: motocolonna, motorized column; motocoltura, mechanical farming; mototrazione, motor traction.

    Dizionario Italiano-Inglese > moto-

  • 106 модульный центр обработки данных (ЦОД)

    1. modular data center

     

    модульный центр обработки данных (ЦОД)
    -
    [Интент]

    Параллельные тексты EN-RU

    [ http://loosebolts.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/our-vision-for-generation-4-modular-data-centers-one-way-of-getting-it-just-right/]

    [ http://dcnt.ru/?p=9299#more-9299]

    Data Centers are a hot topic these days. No matter where you look, this once obscure aspect of infrastructure is getting a lot of attention. For years, there have been cost pressures on IT operations and this, when the need for modern capacity is greater than ever, has thrust data centers into the spotlight. Server and rack density continues to rise, placing DC professionals and businesses in tighter and tougher situations while they struggle to manage their IT environments. And now hyper-scale cloud infrastructure is taking traditional technologies to limits never explored before and focusing the imagination of the IT industry on new possibilities.

    В настоящее время центры обработки данных являются широко обсуждаемой темой. Куда ни посмотришь, этот некогда малоизвестный аспект инфраструктуры привлекает все больше внимания. Годами ИТ-отделы испытывали нехватку средств и это выдвинуло ЦОДы в центр внимания, в то время, когда необходимость в современных ЦОДах стала как никогда высокой. Плотность серверов и стоек продолжают расти, все больше усложняя ситуацию для специалистов в области охлаждения и организаций в их попытках управлять своими ИТ-средами. И теперь гипермасштабируемая облачная инфраструктура подвергает традиционные технологии невиданным ранее нагрузкам, и заставляет ИТ-индустрию искать новые возможности.

    At Microsoft, we have focused a lot of thought and research around how to best operate and maintain our global infrastructure and we want to share those learnings. While obviously there are some aspects that we keep to ourselves, we have shared how we operate facilities daily, our technologies and methodologies, and, most importantly, how we monitor and manage our facilities. Whether it’s speaking at industry events, inviting customers to our “Microsoft data center conferences” held in our data centers, or through other media like blogging and white papers, we believe sharing best practices is paramount and will drive the industry forward. So in that vein, we have some interesting news to share.

    В компании MicroSoft уделяют большое внимание изучению наилучших методов эксплуатации и технического обслуживания своей глобальной инфраструктуры и делятся результатами своих исследований. И хотя мы, конечно, не раскрываем некоторые аспекты своих исследований, мы делимся повседневным опытом эксплуатации дата-центров, своими технологиями и методологиями и, что важнее всего, методами контроля и управления своими объектами. Будь то доклады на отраслевых событиях, приглашение клиентов на наши конференции, которые посвящены центрам обработки данных MicroSoft, и проводятся в этих самых дата-центрах, или использование других средств, например, блоги и спецификации, мы уверены, что обмен передовым опытом имеет первостепенное значение и будет продвигать отрасль вперед.

    Today we are sharing our Generation 4 Modular Data Center plan. This is our vision and will be the foundation of our cloud data center infrastructure in the next five years. We believe it is one of the most revolutionary changes to happen to data centers in the last 30 years. Joining me, in writing this blog are Daniel Costello, my director of Data Center Research and Engineering and Christian Belady, principal power and cooling architect. I feel their voices will add significant value to driving understanding around the many benefits included in this new design paradigm.

    Сейчас мы хотим поделиться своим планом модульного дата-центра четвертого поколения. Это наше видение и оно будет основанием для инфраструктуры наших облачных дата-центров в ближайшие пять лет. Мы считаем, что это одно из самых революционных изменений в дата-центрах за последние 30 лет. Вместе со мной в написании этого блога участвовали Дэниел Костелло, директор по исследованиям и инжинирингу дата-центров, и Кристиан Белади, главный архитектор систем энергоснабжения и охлаждения. Мне кажется, что их авторитет придаст больше веса большому количеству преимуществ, включенных в эту новую парадигму проектирования.

    Our “Gen 4” modular data centers will take the flexibility of containerized servers—like those in our Chicago data center—and apply it across the entire facility. So what do we mean by modular? Think of it like “building blocks”, where the data center will be composed of modular units of prefabricated mechanical, electrical, security components, etc., in addition to containerized servers.

    Was there a key driver for the Generation 4 Data Center?

    Наши модульные дата-центры “Gen 4” будут гибкими с контейнерами серверов – как серверы в нашем чикагском дата-центре. И гибкость будет применяться ко всему ЦОД. Итак, что мы подразумеваем под модульностью? Мы думаем о ней как о “строительных блоках”, где дата-центр будет состоять из модульных блоков изготовленных в заводских условиях электрических систем и систем охлаждения, а также систем безопасности и т.п., в дополнение к контейнеризованным серверам.
    Был ли ключевой стимул для разработки дата-центра четвертого поколения?


    If we were to summarize the promise of our Gen 4 design into a single sentence it would be something like this: “A highly modular, scalable, efficient, just-in-time data center capacity program that can be delivered anywhere in the world very quickly and cheaply, while allowing for continued growth as required.” Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? Well, keep in mind that these concepts have been in initial development and prototyping for over a year and are based on cumulative knowledge of previous facility generations and the advances we have made since we began our investments in earnest on this new design.

    Если бы нам нужно было обобщить достоинства нашего проекта Gen 4 в одном предложении, это выглядело бы следующим образом: “Центр обработки данных с высоким уровнем модульности, расширяемости, и энергетической эффективности, а также возможностью постоянного расширения, в случае необходимости, который можно очень быстро и дешево развертывать в любом месте мира”. Звучит слишком хорошо для того чтобы быть правдой, не так ли? Ну, не забывайте, что эти концепции находились в процессе начальной разработки и создания опытного образца в течение более одного года и основываются на опыте, накопленном в ходе развития предыдущих поколений ЦОД, а также успехах, сделанных нами со времени, когда мы начали вкладывать серьезные средства в этот новый проект.

    One of the biggest challenges we’ve had at Microsoft is something Mike likes to call the ‘Goldilock’s Problem’. In a nutshell, the problem can be stated as:

    The worst thing we can do in delivering facilities for the business is not have enough capacity online, thus limiting the growth of our products and services.

    Одну из самых больших проблем, с которыми приходилось сталкиваться Майкрософт, Майк любит называть ‘Проблемой Лютика’. Вкратце, эту проблему можно выразить следующим образом:

    Самое худшее, что может быть при строительстве ЦОД для бизнеса, это не располагать достаточными производственными мощностями, и тем самым ограничивать рост наших продуктов и сервисов.

    The second worst thing we can do in delivering facilities for the business is to have too much capacity online.

    А вторым самым худшим моментом в этой сфере может слишком большое количество производственных мощностей.

    This has led to a focus on smart, intelligent growth for the business — refining our overall demand picture. It can’t be too hot. It can’t be too cold. It has to be ‘Just Right!’ The capital dollars of investment are too large to make without long term planning. As we struggled to master these interesting challenges, we had to ensure that our technological plan also included solutions for the business and operational challenges we faced as well.
    So let’s take a high level look at our Generation 4 design

    Это заставило нас сосредоточиваться на интеллектуальном росте для бизнеса — refining our overall demand picture. Это не должно быть слишком горячим. И это не должно быть слишком холодным. Это должно быть ‘как раз, таким как надо!’ Нельзя делать такие большие капиталовложения без долгосрочного планирования. Пока мы старались решить эти интересные проблемы, мы должны были гарантировать, что наш технологический план будет также включать решения для коммерческих и эксплуатационных проблем, с которыми нам также приходилось сталкиваться.
    Давайте рассмотрим наш проект дата-центра четвертого поколения

    Are you ready for some great visuals? Check out this video at Soapbox. Click here for the Microsoft 4th Gen Video.

    It’s a concept video that came out of my Data Center Research and Engineering team, under Daniel Costello, that will give you a view into what we think is the future.

    From a configuration, construct-ability and time to market perspective, our primary goals and objectives are to modularize the whole data center. Not just the server side (like the Chicago facility), but the mechanical and electrical space as well. This means using the same kind of parts in pre-manufactured modules, the ability to use containers, skids, or rack-based deployments and the ability to tailor the Redundancy and Reliability requirements to the application at a very specific level.


    Посмотрите это видео, перейдите по ссылке для просмотра видео о Microsoft 4th Gen:

    Это концептуальное видео, созданное командой отдела Data Center Research and Engineering, возглавляемого Дэниелом Костелло, которое даст вам наше представление о будущем.

    С точки зрения конфигурации, строительной технологичности и времени вывода на рынок, нашими главными целями и задачами агрегатирование всего дата-центра. Не только серверную часть, как дата-центр в Чикаго, но также системы охлаждения и электрические системы. Это означает применение деталей одного типа в сборных модулях, возможность использования контейнеров, салазок, или стоечных систем, а также возможность подстраивать требования избыточности и надежности для данного приложения на очень специфичном уровне.

    Our goals from a cost perspective were simple in concept but tough to deliver. First and foremost, we had to reduce the capital cost per critical Mega Watt by the class of use. Some applications can run with N-level redundancy in the infrastructure, others require a little more infrastructure for support. These different classes of infrastructure requirements meant that optimizing for all cost classes was paramount. At Microsoft, we are not a one trick pony and have many Online products and services (240+) that require different levels of operational support. We understand that and ensured that we addressed it in our design which will allow us to reduce capital costs by 20%-40% or greater depending upon class.


    Нашими целями в области затрат были концептуально простыми, но трудно реализуемыми. В первую очередь мы должны были снизить капитальные затраты в пересчете на один мегаватт, в зависимости от класса резервирования. Некоторые приложения могут вполне работать на базе инфраструктуры с резервированием на уровне N, то есть без резервирования, а для работы других приложений требуется больше инфраструктуры. Эти разные классы требований инфраструктуры подразумевали, что оптимизация всех классов затрат имеет преобладающее значение. В Майкрософт мы не ограничиваемся одним решением и располагаем большим количеством интерактивных продуктов и сервисов (240+), которым требуются разные уровни эксплуатационной поддержки. Мы понимаем это, и учитываем это в своем проекте, который позволит нам сокращать капитальные затраты на 20%-40% или более в зависимости от класса.

    For example, non-critical or geo redundant applications have low hardware reliability requirements on a location basis. As a result, Gen 4 can be configured to provide stripped down, low-cost infrastructure with little or no redundancy and/or temperature control. Let’s say an Online service team decides that due to the dramatically lower cost, they will simply use uncontrolled outside air with temperatures ranging 10-35 C and 20-80% RH. The reality is we are already spec-ing this for all of our servers today and working with server vendors to broaden that range even further as Gen 4 becomes a reality. For this class of infrastructure, we eliminate generators, chillers, UPSs, and possibly lower costs relative to traditional infrastructure.

    Например, некритичные или гео-избыточные системы имеют низкие требования к аппаратной надежности на основе местоположения. В результате этого, Gen 4 можно конфигурировать для упрощенной, недорогой инфраструктуры с низким уровнем (или вообще без резервирования) резервирования и / или температурного контроля. Скажем, команда интерактивного сервиса решает, что, в связи с намного меньшими затратами, они будут просто использовать некондиционированный наружный воздух с температурой 10-35°C и влажностью 20-80% RH. В реальности мы уже сегодня предъявляем эти требования к своим серверам и работаем с поставщиками серверов над еще большим расширением диапазона температур, так как наш модуль и подход Gen 4 становится реальностью. Для подобного класса инфраструктуры мы удаляем генераторы, чиллеры, ИБП, и, возможно, будем предлагать более низкие затраты, по сравнению с традиционной инфраструктурой.

    Applications that demand higher level of redundancy or temperature control will use configurations of Gen 4 to meet those needs, however, they will also cost more (but still less than traditional data centers). We see this cost difference driving engineering behavioral change in that we predict more applications will drive towards Geo redundancy to lower costs.

    Системы, которым требуется более высокий уровень резервирования или температурного контроля, будут использовать конфигурации Gen 4, отвечающие этим требованиям, однако, они будут также стоить больше. Но все равно они будут стоить меньше, чем традиционные дата-центры. Мы предвидим, что эти различия в затратах будут вызывать изменения в методах инжиниринга, и по нашим прогнозам, это будет выражаться в переходе все большего числа систем на гео-избыточность и меньшие затраты.

    Another cool thing about Gen 4 is that it allows us to deploy capacity when our demand dictates it. Once finalized, we will no longer need to make large upfront investments. Imagine driving capital costs more closely in-line with actual demand, thus greatly reducing time-to-market and adding the capacity Online inherent in the design. Also reduced is the amount of construction labor required to put these “building blocks” together. Since the entire platform requires pre-manufacture of its core components, on-site construction costs are lowered. This allows us to maximize our return on invested capital.

    Еще одно достоинство Gen 4 состоит в том, что он позволяет нам разворачивать дополнительные мощности, когда нам это необходимо. Как только мы закончим проект, нам больше не нужно будет делать большие начальные капиталовложения. Представьте себе возможность более точного согласования капитальных затрат с реальными требованиями, и тем самым значительного снижения времени вывода на рынок и интерактивного добавления мощностей, предусматриваемого проектом. Также снижен объем строительных работ, требуемых для сборки этих “строительных блоков”. Поскольку вся платформа требует предварительного изготовления ее базовых компонентов, затраты на сборку также снижены. Это позволит нам увеличить до максимума окупаемость своих капиталовложений.
    Мы все подвергаем сомнению

    In our design process, we questioned everything. You may notice there is no roof and some might be uncomfortable with this. We explored the need of one and throughout our research we got some surprising (positive) results that showed one wasn’t needed.

    В своем процессе проектирования мы все подвергаем сомнению. Вы, наверное, обратили внимание на отсутствие крыши, и некоторым специалистам это могло не понравиться. Мы изучили необходимость в крыше и в ходе своих исследований получили удивительные результаты, которые показали, что крыша не нужна.
    Серийное производство дата центров


    In short, we are striving to bring Henry Ford’s Model T factory to the data center. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford#Model_T. Gen 4 will move data centers from a custom design and build model to a commoditized manufacturing approach. We intend to have our components built in factories and then assemble them in one location (the data center site) very quickly. Think about how a computer, car or plane is built today. Components are manufactured by different companies all over the world to a predefined spec and then integrated in one location based on demands and feature requirements. And just like Henry Ford’s assembly line drove the cost of building and the time-to-market down dramatically for the automobile industry, we expect Gen 4 to do the same for data centers. Everything will be pre-manufactured and assembled on the pad.

    Мы хотим применить модель автомобильной фабрики Генри Форда к дата-центру. Проект Gen 4 будет способствовать переходу от модели специализированного проектирования и строительства к товарно-производственному, серийному подходу. Мы намерены изготавливать свои компоненты на заводах, а затем очень быстро собирать их в одном месте, в месте строительства дата-центра. Подумайте о том, как сегодня изготавливается компьютер, автомобиль или самолет. Компоненты изготавливаются по заранее определенным спецификациям разными компаниями во всем мире, затем собираются в одном месте на основе спроса и требуемых характеристик. И точно так же как сборочный конвейер Генри Форда привел к значительному уменьшению затрат на производство и времени вывода на рынок в автомобильной промышленности, мы надеемся, что Gen 4 сделает то же самое для дата-центров. Все будет предварительно изготавливаться и собираться на месте.
    Невероятно энергоэффективный ЦОД


    And did we mention that this platform will be, overall, incredibly energy efficient? From a total energy perspective not only will we have remarkable PUE values, but the total cost of energy going into the facility will be greatly reduced as well. How much energy goes into making concrete? Will we need as much of it? How much energy goes into the fuel of the construction vehicles? This will also be greatly reduced! A key driver is our goal to achieve an average PUE at or below 1.125 by 2012 across our data centers. More than that, we are on a mission to reduce the overall amount of copper and water used in these facilities. We believe these will be the next areas of industry attention when and if the energy problem is solved. So we are asking today…“how can we build a data center with less building”?

    А мы упоминали, что эта платформа будет, в общем, невероятно энергоэффективной? С точки зрения общей энергии, мы получим не только поразительные значения PUE, но общая стоимость энергии, затраченной на объект будет также значительно снижена. Сколько энергии идет на производство бетона? Нам нужно будет столько энергии? Сколько энергии идет на питание инженерных строительных машин? Это тоже будет значительно снижено! Главным стимулом является достижение среднего PUE не больше 1.125 для всех наших дата-центров к 2012 году. Более того, у нас есть задача сокращения общего количества меди и воды в дата-центрах. Мы думаем, что эти задачи станут следующей заботой отрасли после того как будет решена энергетическая проблема. Итак, сегодня мы спрашиваем себя…“как можно построить дата-центр с меньшим объемом строительных работ”?
    Строительство дата центров без чиллеров

    We have talked openly and publicly about building chiller-less data centers and running our facilities using aggressive outside economization. Our sincerest hope is that Gen 4 will completely eliminate the use of water. Today’s data centers use massive amounts of water and we see water as the next scarce resource and have decided to take a proactive stance on making water conservation part of our plan.

    Мы открыто и публично говорили о строительстве дата-центров без чиллеров и активном использовании в наших центрах обработки данных технологий свободного охлаждения или фрикулинга. Мы искренне надеемся, что Gen 4 позволит полностью отказаться от использования воды. Современные дата-центры расходуют большие объемы воды и так как мы считаем воду следующим редким ресурсом, мы решили принять упреждающие меры и включить экономию воды в свой план.

    By sharing this with the industry, we believe everyone can benefit from our methodology. While this concept and approach may be intimidating (or downright frightening) to some in the industry, disclosure ultimately is better for all of us.

    Делясь этим опытом с отраслью, мы считаем, что каждый сможет извлечь выгоду из нашей методологией. Хотя эта концепция и подход могут показаться пугающими (или откровенно страшными) для некоторых отраслевых специалистов, раскрывая свои планы мы, в конечном счете, делаем лучше для всех нас.

    Gen 4 design (even more than just containers), could reduce the ‘religious’ debates in our industry. With the central spine infrastructure in place, containers or pre-manufactured server halls can be either AC or DC, air-side economized or water-side economized, or not economized at all (though the sanity of that might be questioned). Gen 4 will allow us to decommission, repair and upgrade quickly because everything is modular. No longer will we be governed by the initial decisions made when constructing the facility. We will have almost unlimited use and re-use of the facility and site. We will also be able to use power in an ultra-fluid fashion moving load from critical to non-critical as use and capacity requirements dictate.

    Проект Gen 4 позволит уменьшить ‘религиозные’ споры в нашей отрасли. Располагая базовой инфраструктурой, контейнеры или сборные серверные могут оборудоваться системами переменного или постоянного тока, воздушными или водяными экономайзерами, или вообще не использовать экономайзеры. Хотя можно подвергать сомнению разумность такого решения. Gen 4 позволит нам быстро выполнять работы по выводу из эксплуатации, ремонту и модернизации, поскольку все будет модульным. Мы больше не будем руководствоваться начальными решениями, принятыми во время строительства дата-центра. Мы сможем использовать этот дата-центр и инфраструктуру в течение почти неограниченного периода времени. Мы также сможем применять сверхгибкие методы использования электрической энергии, переводя оборудование в режимы критической или некритической нагрузки в соответствии с требуемой мощностью.
    Gen 4 – это стандартная платформа

    Finally, we believe this is a big game changer. Gen 4 will provide a standard platform that our industry can innovate around. For example, all modules in our Gen 4 will have common interfaces clearly defined by our specs and any vendor that meets these specifications will be able to plug into our infrastructure. Whether you are a computer vendor, UPS vendor, generator vendor, etc., you will be able to plug and play into our infrastructure. This means we can also source anyone, anywhere on the globe to minimize costs and maximize performance. We want to help motivate the industry to further innovate—with innovations from which everyone can reap the benefits.

    Наконец, мы уверены, что это будет фактором, который значительно изменит ситуацию. Gen 4 будет представлять собой стандартную платформу, которую отрасль сможет обновлять. Например, все модули в нашем Gen 4 будут иметь общепринятые интерфейсы, четко определяемые нашими спецификациями, и оборудование любого поставщика, которое отвечает этим спецификациям можно будет включать в нашу инфраструктуру. Независимо от того производите вы компьютеры, ИБП, генераторы и т.п., вы сможете включать свое оборудование нашу инфраструктуру. Это означает, что мы также сможем обеспечивать всех, в любом месте земного шара, тем самым сводя до минимума затраты и максимальной увеличивая производительность. Мы хотим создать в отрасли мотивацию для дальнейших инноваций – инноваций, от которых каждый сможет получать выгоду.
    Главные характеристики дата-центров четвертого поколения Gen4

    To summarize, the key characteristics of our Generation 4 data centers are:

    Scalable
    Plug-and-play spine infrastructure
    Factory pre-assembled: Pre-Assembled Containers (PACs) & Pre-Manufactured Buildings (PMBs)
    Rapid deployment
    De-mountable
    Reduce TTM
    Reduced construction
    Sustainable measures

    Ниже приведены главные характеристики дата-центров четвертого поколения Gen 4:

    Расширяемость;
    Готовая к использованию базовая инфраструктура;
    Изготовление в заводских условиях: сборные контейнеры (PAC) и сборные здания (PMB);
    Быстрота развертывания;
    Возможность демонтажа;
    Снижение времени вывода на рынок (TTM);
    Сокращение сроков строительства;
    Экологичность;

    Map applications to DC Class

    We hope you join us on this incredible journey of change and innovation!

    Long hours of research and engineering time are invested into this process. There are still some long days and nights ahead, but the vision is clear. Rest assured however, that we as refine Generation 4, the team will soon be looking to Generation 5 (even if it is a bit farther out). There is always room to get better.


    Использование систем электропитания постоянного тока.

    Мы надеемся, что вы присоединитесь к нам в этом невероятном путешествии по миру изменений и инноваций!

    На этот проект уже потрачены долгие часы исследований и проектирования. И еще предстоит потратить много дней и ночей, но мы имеем четкое представление о конечной цели. Однако будьте уверены, что как только мы доведем до конца проект модульного дата-центра четвертого поколения, мы вскоре начнем думать о проекте дата-центра пятого поколения. Всегда есть возможность для улучшений.

    So if you happen to come across Goldilocks in the forest, and you are curious as to why she is smiling you will know that she feels very good about getting very close to ‘JUST RIGHT’.

    Generations of Evolution – some background on our data center designs

    Так что, если вы встретите в лесу девочку по имени Лютик, и вам станет любопытно, почему она улыбается, вы будете знать, что она очень довольна тем, что очень близко подошла к ‘ОПИМАЛЬНОМУ РЕШЕНИЮ’.
    Поколения эволюции – история развития наших дата-центров

    We thought you might be interested in understanding what happened in the first three generations of our data center designs. When Ray Ozzie wrote his Software plus Services memo it posed a very interesting challenge to us. The winds of change were at ‘tornado’ proportions. That “plus Services” tag had some significant (and unstated) challenges inherent to it. The first was that Microsoft was going to evolve even further into an operations company. While we had been running large scale Internet services since 1995, this development lead us to an entirely new level. Additionally, these “services” would span across both Internet and Enterprise businesses. To those of you who have to operate “stuff”, you know that these are two very different worlds in operational models and challenges. It also meant that, to achieve the same level of reliability and performance required our infrastructure was going to have to scale globally and in a significant way.

    Мы подумали, что может быть вам будет интересно узнать историю первых трех поколений наших центров обработки данных. Когда Рэй Оззи написал свою памятную записку Software plus Services, он поставил перед нами очень интересную задачу. Ветра перемен двигались с ураганной скоростью. Это окончание “plus Services” скрывало в себе какие-то значительные и неопределенные задачи. Первая заключалась в том, что Майкрософт собиралась в еще большей степени стать операционной компанией. Несмотря на то, что мы управляли большими интернет-сервисами, начиная с 1995 г., эта разработка подняла нас на абсолютно новый уровень. Кроме того, эти “сервисы” охватывали интернет-компании и корпорации. Тем, кому приходится всем этим управлять, известно, что есть два очень разных мира в области операционных моделей и задач. Это также означало, что для достижения такого же уровня надежности и производительности требовалось, чтобы наша инфраструктура располагала значительными возможностями расширения в глобальных масштабах.

    It was that intense atmosphere of change that we first started re-evaluating data center technology and processes in general and our ideas began to reach farther than what was accepted by the industry at large. This was the era of Generation 1. As we look at where most of the world’s data centers are today (and where our facilities were), it represented all the known learning and design requirements that had been in place since IBM built the first purpose-built computer room. These facilities focused more around uptime, reliability and redundancy. Big infrastructure was held accountable to solve all potential environmental shortfalls. This is where the majority of infrastructure in the industry still is today.

    Именно в этой атмосфере серьезных изменений мы впервые начали переоценку ЦОД-технологий и технологий вообще, и наши идеи начали выходить за пределы общепринятых в отрасли представлений. Это была эпоха ЦОД первого поколения. Когда мы узнали, где сегодня располагается большинство мировых дата-центров и где находятся наши предприятия, это представляло весь опыт и навыки проектирования, накопленные со времени, когда IBM построила первую серверную. В этих ЦОД больше внимания уделялось бесперебойной работе, надежности и резервированию. Большая инфраструктура была призвана решать все потенциальные экологические проблемы. Сегодня большая часть инфраструктуры все еще находится на этом этапе своего развития.

    We soon realized that traditional data centers were quickly becoming outdated. They were not keeping up with the demands of what was happening technologically and environmentally. That’s when we kicked off our Generation 2 design. Gen 2 facilities started taking into account sustainability, energy efficiency, and really looking at the total cost of energy and operations.

    Очень быстро мы поняли, что стандартные дата-центры очень быстро становятся устаревшими. Они не поспевали за темпами изменений технологических и экологических требований. Именно тогда мы стали разрабатывать ЦОД второго поколения. В этих дата-центрах Gen 2 стали принимать во внимание такие факторы как устойчивое развитие, энергетическая эффективность, а также общие энергетические и эксплуатационные.

    No longer did we view data centers just for the upfront capital costs, but we took a hard look at the facility over the course of its life. Our Quincy, Washington and San Antonio, Texas facilities are examples of our Gen 2 data centers where we explored and implemented new ways to lessen the impact on the environment. These facilities are considered two leading industry examples, based on their energy efficiency and ability to run and operate at new levels of scale and performance by leveraging clean hydro power (Quincy) and recycled waste water (San Antonio) to cool the facility during peak cooling months.

    Мы больше не рассматривали дата-центры только с точки зрения начальных капитальных затрат, а внимательно следили за работой ЦОД на протяжении его срока службы. Наши объекты в Куинси, Вашингтоне, и Сан-Антонио, Техас, являются образцами наших ЦОД второго поколения, в которых мы изучали и применяли на практике новые способы снижения воздействия на окружающую среду. Эти объекты считаются двумя ведущими отраслевыми примерами, исходя из их энергетической эффективности и способности работать на новых уровнях производительности, основанных на использовании чистой энергии воды (Куинси) и рециклирования отработанной воды (Сан-Антонио) для охлаждения объекта в самых жарких месяцах.

    As we were delivering our Gen 2 facilities into steel and concrete, our Generation 3 facilities were rapidly driving the evolution of the program. The key concepts for our Gen 3 design are increased modularity and greater concentration around energy efficiency and scale. The Gen 3 facility will be best represented by the Chicago, Illinois facility currently under construction. This facility will seem very foreign compared to the traditional data center concepts most of the industry is comfortable with. In fact, if you ever sit around in our container hanger in Chicago it will look incredibly different from a traditional raised-floor data center. We anticipate this modularization will drive huge efficiencies in terms of cost and operations for our business. We will also introduce significant changes in the environmental systems used to run our facilities. These concepts and processes (where applicable) will help us gain even greater efficiencies in our existing footprint, allowing us to further maximize infrastructure investments.

    Так как наши ЦОД второго поколения строились из стали и бетона, наши центры обработки данных третьего поколения начали их быстро вытеснять. Главными концептуальными особенностями ЦОД третьего поколения Gen 3 являются повышенная модульность и большее внимание к энергетической эффективности и масштабированию. Дата-центры третьего поколения лучше всего представлены объектом, который в настоящее время строится в Чикаго, Иллинойс. Этот ЦОД будет выглядеть очень необычно, по сравнению с общепринятыми в отрасли представлениями о дата-центре. Действительно, если вам когда-либо удастся побывать в нашем контейнерном ангаре в Чикаго, он покажется вам совершенно непохожим на обычный дата-центр с фальшполом. Мы предполагаем, что этот модульный подход будет способствовать значительному повышению эффективности нашего бизнеса в отношении затрат и операций. Мы также внесем существенные изменения в климатические системы, используемые в наших ЦОД. Эти концепции и технологии, если применимо, позволят нам добиться еще большей эффективности наших существующих дата-центров, и тем самым еще больше увеличивать капиталовложения в инфраструктуру.

    This is definitely a journey, not a destination industry. In fact, our Generation 4 design has been under heavy engineering for viability and cost for over a year. While the demand of our commercial growth required us to make investments as we grew, we treated each step in the learning as a process for further innovation in data centers. The design for our future Gen 4 facilities enabled us to make visionary advances that addressed the challenges of building, running, and operating facilities all in one concerted effort.

    Это определенно путешествие, а не конечный пункт назначения. На самом деле, наш проект ЦОД четвертого поколения подвергался серьезным испытаниям на жизнеспособность и затраты на протяжении целого года. Хотя необходимость в коммерческом росте требовала от нас постоянных капиталовложений, мы рассматривали каждый этап своего развития как шаг к будущим инновациям в области дата-центров. Проект наших будущих ЦОД четвертого поколения Gen 4 позволил нам делать фантастические предположения, которые касались задач строительства, управления и эксплуатации объектов как единого упорядоченного процесса.


    Тематики

    Синонимы

    EN

    Русско-английский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > модульный центр обработки данных (ЦОД)

  • 107 механическая очистка

    3) Forestry: mechanical refining
    4) Food industry: mechanical peeling
    5) Ecology: primary treatment
    6) Oil&Gas technology mechanical cleaning
    7) Electrochemistry: tool cleaning

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > механическая очистка

  • 108 Smeaton, John

    [br]
    b. 8 June 1724 Austhorpe, near Leeds, Yorkshire, England
    d. 28 October 1792 Austhorpe, near Leeds, Yorkshire, England
    [br]
    English mechanical and civil engineer.
    [br]
    As a boy, Smeaton showed mechanical ability, making for himself a number of tools and models. This practical skill was backed by a sound education, probably at Leeds Grammar School. At the age of 16 he entered his father's office; he seemed set to follow his father's profession in the law. In 1742 he went to London to continue his legal studies, but he preferred instead, with his father's reluctant permission, to set up as a scientific instrument maker and dealer and opened a shop of his own in 1748. About this time he began attending meetings of the Royal Society and presented several papers on instruments and mechanical subjects, being elected a Fellow in 1753. His interests were turning towards engineering but were informed by scientific principles grounded in careful and accurate observation.
    In 1755 the second Eddystone lighthouse, on a reef some 14 miles (23 km) off the English coast at Plymouth, was destroyed by fire. The President of the Royal Society was consulted as to a suitable engineer to undertake the task of constructing a new one, and he unhesitatingly suggested Smeaton. Work began in 1756 and was completed in three years to produce the first great wave-swept stone lighthouse. It was constructed of Portland stone blocks, shaped and pegged both together and to the base rock, and bonded by hydraulic cement, scientifically developed by Smeaton. It withstood the storms of the English Channel for over a century, but by 1876 erosion of the rock had weakened the structure and a replacement had to be built. The upper portion of Smeaton's lighthouse was re-erected on a suitable base on Plymouth Hoe, leaving the original base portion on the reef as a memorial to the engineer.
    The Eddystone lighthouse made Smeaton's reputation and from then on he was constantly in demand as a consultant in all kinds of engineering projects. He carried out a number himself, notably the 38 mile (61 km) long Forth and Clyde canal with thirty-nine locks, begun in 1768 but for financial reasons not completed until 1790. In 1774 he took charge of the Ramsgate Harbour works.
    On the mechanical side, Smeaton undertook a systematic study of water-and windmills, to determine the design and construction to achieve the greatest power output. This work issued forth as the paper "An experimental enquiry concerning the natural powers of water and wind to turn mills" and exerted a considerable influence on mill design during the early part of the Industrial Revolution. Between 1753 and 1790 Smeaton constructed no fewer than forty-four mills.
    Meanwhile, in 1756 he had returned to Austhorpe, which continued to be his home base for the rest of his life. In 1767, as a result of the disappointing performance of an engine he had been involved with at New River Head, Islington, London, Smeaton began his important study of the steam-engine. Smeaton was the first to apply scientific principles to the steam-engine and achieved the most notable improvements in its efficiency since its invention by Newcomen, until its radical overhaul by James Watt. To compare the performance of engines quantitatively, he introduced the concept of "duty", i.e. the weight of water that could be raised 1 ft (30 cm) while burning one bushel (84 lb or 38 kg) of coal. The first engine to embody his improvements was erected at Long Benton colliery in Northumberland in 1772, with a duty of 9.45 million pounds, compared to the best figure obtained previously of 7.44 million pounds. One source of heat loss he attributed to inaccurate boring of the cylinder, which he was able to improve through his close association with Carron Ironworks near Falkirk, Scotland.
    [br]
    Principal Honours and Distinctions
    FRS 1753.
    Bibliography
    1759, "An experimental enquiry concerning the natural powers of water and wind to turn mills", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.
    Towards the end of his life, Smeaton intended to write accounts of his many works but only completed A Narrative of the Eddystone Lighthouse, 1791, London.
    Further Reading
    S.Smiles, 1874, Lives of the Engineers: Smeaton and Rennie, London. A.W.Skempton, (ed.), 1981, John Smeaton FRS, London: Thomas Telford. L.T.C.Rolt and J.S.Allen, 1977, The Steam Engine of Thomas Newcomen, 2nd edn, Hartington: Moorland Publishing, esp. pp. 108–18 (gives a good description of his work on the steam-engine).
    LRD

    Biographical history of technology > Smeaton, John

  • 109 Cartwright, Revd Edmund

    [br]
    b. 24 April 1743 Marnham, Nottingham, England
    d. 30 October 1823 Hastings, Sussex, England
    [br]
    English inventor of the power loom, a combing machine and machines for making ropes, bread and bricks as well as agricultural improvements.
    [br]
    Edmund Cartwright, the fourth son of William Cartwright, was educated at Wakefield Grammar School, and went to University College, Oxford, at the age of 14. By special act of convocation in 1764, he was elected Fellow of Magdalen College. He married Alice Whitaker in 1772 and soon after was given the ecclesiastical living of Brampton in Derbyshire. In 1779 he was presented with the living of Goadby, Marwood, Leicestershire, where he wrote poems, reviewed new works, and began agricultural experiments. A visit to Matlock in the summer of 1784 introduced him to the inventions of Richard Arkwright and he asked why weaving could not be mechanized in a similar manner to spinning. This began a remarkable career of inventions.
    Cartwright returned home and built a loom which required two strong men to operate it. This was the first attempt in England to develop a power loom. It had a vertical warp, the reed fell with the weight of at least half a hundredweight and, to quote Gartwright's own words, "the springs which threw the shuttle were strong enough to throw a Congreive [sic] rocket" (Strickland 19.71:8—for background to the "rocket" comparison, see Congreve, Sir William). Nevertheless, it had the same three basics of weaving that still remain today in modern power looms: shedding or dividing the warp; picking or projecting the shuttle with the weft; and beating that pick of weft into place with a reed. This loom he proudly patented in 1785, and then he went to look at hand looms and was surprised to see how simply they operated. Further improvements to his own loom, covered by two more patents in 1786 and 1787, produced a machine with the more conventional horizontal layout that showed promise; however, the Manchester merchants whom he visited were not interested. He patented more improvements in 1788 as a result of the experience gained in 1786 through establishing a factory at Doncaster with power looms worked by a bull that were the ancestors of modern ones. Twenty-four looms driven by steam-power were installed in Manchester in 1791, but the mill was burned down and no one repeated the experiment. The Doncaster mill was sold in 1793, Cartwright having lost £30,000, However, in 1809 Parliament voted him £10,000 because his looms were then coming into general use.
    In 1789 he began working on a wool-combing machine which he patented in 1790, with further improvements in 1792. This seems to have been the earliest instance of mechanized combing. It used a circular revolving comb from which the long fibres or "top" were. carried off into a can, and a smaller cylinder-comb for teasing out short fibres or "noils", which were taken off by hand. Its output equalled that of twenty hand combers, but it was only relatively successful. It was employed in various Leicestershire and Yorkshire mills, but infringements were frequent and costly to resist. The patent was prolonged for fourteen years after 1801, but even then Cartwright did not make any profit. His 1792 patent also included a machine to make ropes with the outstanding and basic invention of the "cordelier" which he communicated to his friends, including Robert Fulton, but again it brought little financial benefit. As a result of these problems and the lack of remuneration for his inventions, Cartwright moved to London in 1796 and for a time lived in a house built with geometrical bricks of his own design.
    Other inventions followed fast, including a tread-wheel for cranes, metallic packing for pistons in steam-engines, and bread-making and brick-making machines, to mention but a few. He had already returned to agricultural improvements and he put forward suggestions in 1793 for a reaping machine. In 1801 he received a prize from the Board of Agriculture for an essay on husbandry, which was followed in 1803 by a silver medal for the invention of a three-furrow plough and in 1805 by a gold medal for his essay on manures. From 1801 to 1807 he ran an experimental farm on the Duke of Bedford's estates at Woburn.
    From 1786 until his death he was a prebendary of Lincoln. In about 1810 he bought a small farm at Hollanden near Sevenoaks, Kent, where he continued his inventions, both agricultural and general. Inventing to the last, he died at Hastings and was buried in Battle church.
    [br]
    Principal Honours and Distinctions
    Board of Agriculture Prize 1801 (for an essay on agriculture). Society of Arts, Silver Medal 1803 (for his three-furrow plough); Gold Medal 1805 (for an essay on agricultural improvements).
    Bibliography
    1785. British patent no. 1,270 (power loom).
    1786. British patent no. 1,565 (improved power loom). 1787. British patent no. 1,616 (improved power loom).
    1788. British patent no. 1,676 (improved power loom). 1790, British patent no. 1,747 (wool-combing machine).
    1790, British patent no. 1,787 (wool-combing machine).
    1792, British patent no. 1,876 (improved wool-combing machine and rope-making machine with cordelier).
    Further Reading
    M.Strickland, 1843, A Memoir of the Life, Writings and Mechanical Inventions of Edmund Cartwright, D.D., F.R.S., London (remains the fullest biography of Cartwright).
    Dictionary of National Biography (a good summary of Cartwright's life). For discussions of Cartwright's weaving inventions, see: A.Barlow, 1878, The History and Principles of Weaving by Hand and by Power, London; R.L. Hills, 1970, Power in the Industrial Revolution, Manchester. F.Nasmith, 1925–6, "Fathers of machine cotton manufacture", Transactions of the
    Newcomen Society 6.
    H.W.Dickinson, 1942–3, "A condensed history of rope-making", Transactions of the Newcomen Society 23.
    W.English, 1969, The Textile Industry, London (covers both his power loom and his wool -combing machine).
    RLH

    Biographical history of technology > Cartwright, Revd Edmund

  • 110 с механическим приводом

    1) General subject: power actuated
    2) Military: power-operated
    4) Construction: mechanically operated, powered
    5) Railway term: direct operation, gear-driven
    6) Automobile industry: power-drawn
    7) Mining: operate by power
    10) General subject: mechanically actuated

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > с механическим приводом

  • 111 Gresley, Sir Herbert Nigel

    [br]
    b. 19 June 1876 Edinburgh, Scotland
    d. 5 April 1941 Hertford, England
    [br]
    English mechanical engineer, designer of the A4-class 4–6–2 locomotive holding the world speed record for steam traction.
    [br]
    Gresley was the son of the Rector of Netherseale, Derbyshire; he was educated at Marlborough and by the age of 13 was skilled at making sketches of locomotives. In 1893 he became a pupil of F.W. Webb at Crewe works, London \& North Western Railway, and in 1898 he moved to Horwich works, Lancashire \& Yorkshire Railway, to gain drawing-office experience under J.A.F.Aspinall, subsequently becoming Foreman of the locomotive running sheds at Blackpool. In 1900 he transferred to the carriage and wagon department, and in 1904 he had risen to become its Assistant Superintendent. In 1905 he moved to the Great Northern Railway, becoming Superintendent of its carriage and wagon department at Doncaster under H.A. Ivatt. In 1906 he designed and produced a bogie luggage van with steel underframe, teak body, elliptical roof, bowed ends and buckeye couplings: this became the prototype for East Coast main-line coaches built over the next thirty-five years. In 1911 Gresley succeeded Ivatt as Locomotive, Carriage \& Wagon Superintendent. His first locomotive was a mixed-traffic 2–6–0, his next a 2–8–0 for freight. From 1915 he worked on the design of a 4–6–2 locomotive for express passenger traffic: as with Ivatt's 4 4 2s, the trailing axle would allow the wide firebox needed for Yorkshire coal. He also devised a means by which two sets of valve gear could operate the valves on a three-cylinder locomotive and applied it for the first time on a 2–8–0 built in 1918. The system was complex, but a later simplified form was used on all subsequent Gresley three-cylinder locomotives, including his first 4–6–2 which appeared in 1922. In 1921, Gresley introduced the first British restaurant car with electric cooking facilities.
    With the grouping of 1923, the Great Northern Railway was absorbed into the London \& North Eastern Railway and Gresley was appointed Chief Mechanical Engineer. More 4–6– 2s were built, the first British class of such wheel arrangement. Modifications to their valve gear, along lines developed by G.J. Churchward, reduced their coal consumption sufficiently to enable them to run non-stop between London and Edinburgh. So that enginemen might change over en route, some of the locomotives were equipped with corridor tenders from 1928. The design was steadily improved in detail, and by comparison an experimental 4–6–4 with a watertube boiler that Gresley produced in 1929 showed no overall benefit. A successful high-powered 2–8–2 was built in 1934, following the introduction of third-class sleeping cars, to haul 500-ton passenger trains between Edinburgh and Aberdeen.
    In 1932 the need to meet increasing road competition had resulted in the end of a long-standing agreement between East Coast and West Coast railways, that train journeys between London and Edinburgh by either route should be scheduled to take 8 1/4 hours. Seeking to accelerate train services, Gresley studied high-speed, diesel-electric railcars in Germany and petrol-electric railcars in France. He considered them for the London \& North Eastern Railway, but a test run by a train hauled by one of his 4–6–2s in 1934, which reached 108 mph (174 km/h), suggested that a steam train could better the railcar proposals while its accommodation would be more comfortable. To celebrate the Silver Jubilee of King George V, a high-speed, streamlined train between London and Newcastle upon Tyne was proposed, the first such train in Britain. An improved 4–6–2, the A4 class, was designed with modifications to ensure free running and an ample reserve of power up hill. Its streamlined outline included a wedge-shaped front which reduced wind resistance and helped to lift the exhaust dear of the cab windows at speed. The first locomotive of the class, named Silver Link, ran at an average speed of 100 mph (161 km/h) for 43 miles (69 km), with a maximum speed of 112 1/2 mph (181 km/h), on a seven-coach test train on 27 September 1935: the locomotive went into service hauling the Silver Jubilee express single-handed (since others of the class had still to be completed) for the first three weeks, a round trip of 536 miles (863 km) daily, much of it at 90 mph (145 km/h), without any mechanical troubles at all. Coaches for the Silver Jubilee had teak-framed, steel-panelled bodies on all-steel, welded underframes; windows were double glazed; and there was a pressure ventilation/heating system. Comparable trains were introduced between London Kings Cross and Edinburgh in 1937 and to Leeds in 1938.
    Gresley did not hesitate to incorporate outstanding features from elsewhere into his locomotive designs and was well aware of the work of André Chapelon in France. Four A4s built in 1938 were equipped with Kylchap twin blast-pipes and double chimneys to improve performance still further. The first of these to be completed, no. 4468, Mallard, on 3 July 1938 ran a test train at over 120 mph (193 km/h) for 2 miles (3.2 km) and momentarily achieved 126 mph (203 km/h), the world speed record for steam traction. J.Duddington was the driver and T.Bray the fireman. The use of high-speed trains came to an end with the Second World War. The A4s were then demonstrated to be powerful as well as fast: one was noted hauling a 730-ton, 22-coach train at an average speed exceeding 75 mph (120 km/h) over 30 miles (48 km). The war also halted electrification of the Manchester-Sheffield line, on the 1,500 volt DC overhead system; however, anticipating eventual resumption, Gresley had a prototype main-line Bo-Bo electric locomotive built in 1941. Sadly, Gresley died from a heart attack while still in office.
    [br]
    Principal Honours and Distinctions
    Knighted 1936. President, Institution of Locomotive Engineers 1927 and 1934. President, Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1936.
    Further Reading
    F.A.S.Brown, 1961, Nigel Gresley, Locomotive Engineer, Ian Allan (full-length biography).
    John Bellwood and David Jenkinson, Gresley and Stanier. A Centenary Tribute (a good comparative account).
    PJGR

    Biographical history of technology > Gresley, Sir Herbert Nigel

  • 112 Stanier, Sir William Arthur

    [br]
    b. 27 May 1876 Swindon, England
    d. 27 September 1965 London, England
    [br]
    English Chief Mechanical Engineer of the London Midland \& Scottish Railway, the locomotive stock of which he modernized most effectively.
    [br]
    Stanier's career started when he was Office Boy at the Great Western Railway's Swindon works. He was taken on as a pupil in 1892 and steady promotion elevated him to Works Manager in 1920, under Chief Mechanical Engineer George Churchward. In 1923 he became Principal Assistant to Churchward's successor, C.B.Collett. In 1932, at the age of 56 and after some forty years' service with the Great Western Railway (GWR), W.A.Stanier was appointed Chief Mechanical Engineer of the London Midland \& Scottish Railway (LMS). This, the largest British railway, had been formed by the amalgamation in 1923 of several long-established railways, including the London \& North Western and the Midland, that had strong and disparate traditions in locomotive design. A coherent and comprehensive policy had still to emerge; Stanier did, however, inherit a policy of reducing the number of types of locomotives, in the interest of economy, by the withdrawal and replacement of small classes, which had originated with constituent companies.
    Initially as replacements, Stanier brought in to the LMS a series of highly successful standard locomotives; this practice may be considered a development of that of G.J.Churchward on the GWR. Notably, these new locomotives included: the class 5, mixed-traffic 4–6–0; the 8F heavy-freight 2–8–0; and the "Duchess" 4–6–2 for express passenger trains. Stanier also built, in 1935, a steam-turbine-driven 4–6–2, which became the only steam-turbine locomotive in Britain to have an extended career in regular service, although the economies it provided were insufficient for more of the type to be built. From 1932–3 onwards, and initially as part of a programme to economize on shunting costs by producing a single-manned locomotive, the LMS started to develop diesel shunting locomotives. Stanier delegated much of the responsibility for these to C.E.Fairburn. From 1939 diesel-electric shunting locomotives were being built in quantity for the LMS: this was the first instance of adoption of diesel power on a large scale by a British main-line railway. In a remarkably short time, Stanier transformed LMS locomotive stock, formerly the most backward of the principal British railways, to the point at which it was second to none. He was seconded to the Government as Scientific Advisor to the Ministry of Production in 1942, and retired two years later.
    [br]
    Principal Honours and Distinctions
    Knighted 1943. FRS 1944. President, Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1941.
    Bibliography
    1955, "George Jackson Churchward", Transactions of the Newcomen Society 30 (Stanier provides a unique view of the life and work of his former chief).
    Further Reading
    O.S.Nock, 1964, Sir William Stanier, An Engineering Biography, Shepperton: Ian Allan (a full-length biography).
    John Bellwood and David Jenkinson, 1976, Oresley and Stanier. A Centenary Tribute, London: HMSO (a comparative account).
    C.Hamilton Ellis, 1970, London Midland \& Scottish, Shepperton: Ian Allan.
    PJGR

    Biographical history of technology > Stanier, Sir William Arthur

  • 113 Villard de Honnecourt

    [br]
    b. c. 1200 Honnecourt-sur-Escaut, near Cambrai, France
    d. mid-13th century (?) France
    [br]
    French architect-engineer.
    [br]
    Villard was one of the thirteenth-century architect-engineers who were responsible for the design and construction of the great Gothic cathedrals and other churches of the time. Their responsibilities covered all aspects of the work, including (in the spirit of the Roman architect Vitruvius) the invention and construction of mechanical devices. In their time, these men were highly esteemed and richly rewarded, although few of the inscriptions paying tribute to their achievements have survived. Villard stands out among them because a substantial part of his sketchbook has survived, in the form of thirty-three parchment sheets of drawings and notes, now kept in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. Villard's professional career lasted roughly from 1225 to 1250. As a boy, he went to work on the building of the Cistercian monastery at Vaucelles, not far from Honnecourt, and afterwards he was apprenticed to the masons' lodge at Cambrai Cathedral, where he began copying the drawings and layouts on the tracing-house floor. All his drawings are, therefore, of the plans, elevations and sections of cathedrals. These buildings have long since been destroyed, but his drawings, perhaps among his earliest, bear witness to their architecture. He travelled widely in France and recorded features of the great works at Reims, Laon and Chartres. These include the complex system of passageways built into the fabric of a great cathedral; Villard comments that one of their purposes was "to allow circulation in case of fire".
    Villard was invited to Hungary and reached there c. 1235. He may have been responsible for the edifice dedicated to St Elizabeth of Hungary, canonized in 1235, at Kassa (now Košice, Slovakia). Villard probably returned to France c. 1240, at least before the Tartar invasion of Hungary in 1241.
    His sketchbook, which dates to c. 1235, stands as a memorial to Villard's skill as a draughtsman, a student of perspective and a mechanical engineer. He took his sketchbook with him on his travels, and used ideas from it in his work abroad. It contains architectural designs, geometrical constructions for use in building, surveying exercises and drawings for various kinds of mechanical devices, for civil or military use. He was transmitting details from the highly developed French Gothic masons to the relatively underdeveloped eastern countries. The notebooks were annotated for the use of pupils and other master masons, and the notes on geometry were obviously intended for pupils. The prize examples are the pages in the book, clearly Villard's own work, related to mechanical devices. Whilst he, like many others of the period and after, played with designs for perpetual-motion machines, he concentrated on useful devices. These included the first Western representation of a perpetualmotion machine, which at least displays a concern to derive a source of energy: this was a water-powered sawmill, with automatic feed of the timber into the mill. This has been described as the first industrial automatic power-machine to involve two motions, for it not only converts the rotary motion of the water-wheel to the reciprocating motion of the saw, but incorporates a means of keeping the log pressed against the saw. His other designs included water-wheels, watermills, the Archimedean screw and other curious devices.
    [br]
    Bibliography
    Of several facsimile reprints with notes there are Album de Villard de Honnecourt, 1858, ed. J.B.Lassus, Paris (repr. 1968, Paris: Laget), and The Sketchbook of Villard de Honnecourt, 1959, ed. T.Bowie, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Further Reading
    J.Gimpel, 1977, "Villard de Honnecourt: architect and engineer", The Medieval Machine, London: Victor Gollancz, ch. 6, pp. 114–46.
    ——1988, The Medieval Machine, the Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages, London.
    R.Pernord, J.Gimpel and R.Delatouche, 1986, Le Moyen age pour quoi fayre, Paris.
    KM / LRD

    Biographical history of technology > Villard de Honnecourt

  • 114 атомная энергия

    1. atomic energy
    2. nuclear power

    водная энергия, гидроэнергияwater power

    Русско-английский большой базовый словарь > атомная энергия

  • 115 двигатель



    - (газотурбинный, поршневой, тепловой) — engine
    - (гидравлический, пневматический, электрический) — motor
    -, авиационный — aircraft engine
    двигатель, используемый или предназначенный к использованию в авиации для перемещения и (или) поддержания ла, на котором он установлен, в воздухе (рис. 46). — an engine that is used or intended to be used in propelting or lifting aircraft.
    - аналогичной конструкцииengine of identical design and сonstruction
    - без наддува (ид)unsupercharged engine
    -, безредукторный — direct-drive engine
    -, безредукторный винто-вентиляторный (незакопоченный) — unducted fan engine (udf)
    винтовентиляторы вращаются непосредственно силовой (свободной) турбиной с противоположным вращением рабочих колес. — fans are driven directly by a counter-rotating turbine, eliminating complexity of a reduction gearbox.
    -, бензиновый — gasoline engine
    -, боковой (рис. 13) — side engine
    - в подвесной мотогондолеpod engine
    -, вентиляторный, с противоположным вращением вентиляторов — contrafan engine
    - вертикальной наводки, приводной (стрелкового вооружения) — (gun) elevation drive motor
    -, винто-вентиляторный (тввд) — prop-fan engine
    -, включенный (работающий) — operating/running/engine
    -, внешний (по отношению к фюзеляжу) (рис. 44) — outboard engine
    - внутреннего сгоранияinternal-combustion engine
    -, внутренний (по отношению к наружному двигателю) (рис. 44) — inboard engine
    - воздушного охлаждения (пд)air-cooled engine
    двигатель, у которого отвод тепла от цилиндров производится воздухом, непосредственно обдувающим их. — an engine whose running temperature is controlled by means of air cooled cylinders.
    -, вспомогательный (всу) — auxiliary power unit (apu)
    -, выключенный — shutdown engine
    -, выключенный (неработающий) — inoperative engine
    -, высокооборотный — high-speed engine
    -, высотный — high-altitude engine
    -, газотурбинный (гтд) — turbine engine
    -, газотурбинный (вертолетныи) — helicopter turboshaft engine
    -,газотурбинный-энергоузел (стартер-энергоузел) — turbine-starter - auxiliary power unit, starter - apu
    - (-) генераторmotor-generator
    устройство для преобразования одного вида эл. энергии в другую (напр., переменный ток в постоянный). — а motor-generator combination for converting one kind of electric power to another (e.g. ас to dc)
    - горизонтальной наводки, приводной (стрелкового вооружения) — (gun) azimuth drive motor
    - двухвальной схемы (турбовальный)two-shaft turbine engine
    -, двухвальный турбовинтовой — two-shaft turboprop engine
    -, двухвальный турбореактивный — two-shaft /-rotor, -spool/turbojet engine
    -, двухкаскадный — two-rotor /-shaft, -spool/ engine, twin-spool engine
    двухвальный турбореактивный двигатель называется также двухроторным или двухкаскадным двигателем. — а two-rotor engine is a twoshaft or two-spool engine with lp and hp compressors and hp and lp turbines.
    -, двухкаскадный, двухконтурный, (турбореактивный) — two-rotor /twin-spool/ by-pass turbo-jet engine
    -, двухкаскадный, турбовальный, газотурбинный, со свободной турбиной — two-rotor /twin-spool/ turboshaft engine with free-power turbine
    -, двухкаскадный, турбовентиляторвый с устройством отклонения направления тяги — two-rotor /twin-spool/ turbofan engine with thrust deflector system
    -, двухконтурный — by-pass /bypass/ engine
    гтд, в котором, помимо основного внутреннего (первого) контура, имеется наружный (второй) контур, представляющий собой канал кольцевого сечения, оканчивающийся у реактивного сопла. — in а by-pass engine, a part of the air leaving the lp cornpressor is dueted through the by-pass duct around the engine main duct to the exhaust unit to be exhausted to the atmosphere.
    -, двухконтурный с дожиганиem во втором контуре — duct-burning by-pass engine
    -, двухконтурный со смешиванием потоков наружного и и внутренного контуров — by-pass exhaust mixing engine
    -, двухроторный — two-rotor engine
    - двухрядная звезда (пд)double-row radial engine
    двигатель, у которого цнлиндры расположены двумя рядами радиально относительнo одного oбщего коленчатоro вала. — an engine having two rows of cylinders arranged radially around а common crankshaft. the corresponding front and rear cylinders may or may not be in line.
    -, двухтактный (пд) — two-cycle engine
    -, дозвуковой — subsonic engine
    -, доработанный по модификации (1705) — engine incorporating mod. (1705), post-mod. (1705) engine
    -, звездообразный — radial engine
    поршневой двигатель с радиальным расположением цилиндров, оси которых лежат в одной, двух или нескольких плоскостях, перпендикулярных к оси коленчатого вала — an engine having stationary cylinders arranged radially around а commom crankshaft.
    -, звездообразный двухрядный — double-row radial engine
    -, звездообразный однорядный — single-row radial engine
    -, исполнительный (эл.) — (electric) actuator, servo motor
    -, исполнительный, канала курса (крена или тангажа) (гироплатформы) — azimuth (roll or pitch) servornotor
    -, карбюраторный (пд) — carburetor engine
    -, коррекционный (гироскопического прибора) — erection torque motor
    -, критический — critical engine
    двигатель, отказ которого вызывает наиболее неблагоприятные изменения в поведении самолета, управляемости и избытке тяги. — "critical engineп means the engine whose failure would most adversely affect the performance or handling qualities of an aircraft.
    -, крыльевой (установленный на крыле) — wing engine
    - левого вращенияengine of lh rotation
    -, маломощный — low-powered engine
    -, многорядный (пд) — multirow engine
    -, многорядный звездообразный — multirow radial engine
    -, модифицированный — modified engine
    - модульной конструкцииmodule-construction engine

    lp compressor - module i, hp compressor - module 2, etc.
    -, мощный — high-powered engine
    -, недоработанный no модификацин (1705) — engine not incorporating mod. (1705), pre-mod. (1705) engine
    -, незакапоченный — uncowled engine
    - непосредственного впрыска (пд)fuel injection engine
    -, неработающий — inoperative engine
    -, одновальный (гтд) — single-shaft /single-rotor/ turbine engine
    -, одновальный двухконтурный — single-shaft /single-rotor/ bypass engine
    -, одновальный турбовентиляторный — single-shaft /single-rotor/ turbofan engine
    -, одновальный турбовинтовой — single-shaft turboprop engine
    -, одновальный турбореактивный — single-shaft /single-rotor/turbojet engine
    -, однорядный (пд) — single-row engine
    -, опытный — prototype engine
    двигатель определенного тиna, еще не прошедший типовые государственные испытания. — the tirst engine of a type and arrangement not approved previously, to be submitted for type approval test.
    -, основной — main engine
    -, оставшийся (продолжающий работать) — remaining engine
    -, отказавший — inoperative/failed/ engine
    - отработки (эл., исполнительный) — servomotor
    - отработки следящей системыservo loop drive motor
    - подтяга (патронной ленты)ammunition booster torque motor
    -, поперечный коррекционный (авиагоризонта) — roll erection torque motor
    -, поршневой (пд) — reciprocating engine
    - правого вращенияengine of rh rotation
    -, продольный коррекционный (авиагоризонта) — pitch erection torque motor
    -, прямоточный — ramjet engine
    двигатель без механического компрессора, в котором сжатие воздуха обеспечивается поступательным движением самого двигателя. — а jet engine with no meehanical compressor, and using the air for combustion compressed by forward motion of the engine.
    - работающийoperating engine
    -, работающий с перебоями — rough engine
    двигатель, работающий с неисправной системой зажигания или подачи топлива (рабочей смеси) — an engine that is running or firing unevenly, usually due to а faulty condition in either the fuel or ignition systems.
    - рамы крена (гироплатформыroll-gimbal servomotor
    - рамы курса (гироплатформыazimuth-gimbal servomotor
    - рамы тангажа (гироплатформы)pitch-gimbal servomotor
    -, реактивный — jet-engine
    двигатель, в котором энергия топлива преобразуется в кинетическую энергию газовой струи, вытекающей из двигателя, a получающаяся за счет этого сила реакции нenоcредственно используется как сила тяги для перемещения летательного аппарата. — an aircraft engine that derives all or most of its thrust by reaction to its ejection of combustion products (or heated air) in a jet and that obtains oxygen from the atmosphere for the combustion of its fuel.
    -, реактивный, пульсирующий — pulse jet (engine)
    применяется для непосредственного вращения несущеro винта вертолета. — pulse jets are designed for helicopter rotor propulsion.
    -, ремонтный — overhauled engine
    серийный двигатель, отремонтированный или восстановленный до состояния, удовлетворяющего требованиям серийного стандарта, и пригодный для дальнейшей эксплуатации в течение установленного межремонтного ресурса. — an engine which has been repaired or reconditioned to а standard rendering it eligible for the complete overhaul life agreed by the national authority.
    - с внешним смесеобразованием (пд)carburetor engine
    двигатель внутреннего сгорания, у которого горючая смесь образуется вне рабочего цилиндра. — an engine in which the fuel/air mixture is formed in the carburetor.
    - с внутренним смесеобразованиемfuel-injection engine
    двигатель, у которого горючая смесь образуется внутри рабочего цилиндра. — an engine in which fuel is directly injected into the cylinders.
    - с водяным охлаждением (пд)water-cooled engine
    - с высокой степенью сжатияhigh-compression engine
    - с нагнетателем (пд)supercharged engine
    - с наддувом (пд) с осевым компрессором (пд)supercharged engine axial-flom turbine engine
    - с передним расположением вентилятораfront fan turbine engine
    - с противоточной камерой сгорания (гтд)reverse-flow turbine engine
    - с редукторомengine with reduction gear
    - с форсажной камерой (гтд). двигатель с дополнительным сжиганием топлива в специальной камере за турбиной — engine with afterburner, afterburning engine, reheat(ed) engine, engine with thrust augmentor
    - с форсированной (взлетной) мощностьюengine with augmented (takeoff) power rating
    - с центробежным компрессором (гтд)radial-flow turbine engine
    -, серийный — series engine
    двигатель, изготовляемый в серийном производстве и соответствующий опытному двигателю, принятому при государственных испытаниях для серийного производства. — an engine essentially identiin design, in materials, and in methods of construction, with one which has been approved previously.
    - со свободной турбинойfree-luroine engine
    двигатель с двумя турбинами, валы которых кинематически не связаны. одна из турбин обычно служит для привода компрессора, а другая используется для передачи полезной работы потребителю, например, воздушному (или несущему) винту. — the engine with two turbines whose shafts are not mechanically coupled. one turbine drives the compressor, and the other free turbine drives the propeller or rotor.
    - следящей системы по внутреннему крену (гироплатформы)inner roll gimbal servomotor
    - следящей системы по наружному крену (гироплатформы)outer roll gimbal servomotor
    - следящей системы по курсу (гироплатформы)azimuth gimbal servomotor
    - следящей системы по тангажу (гироплатформы)pitch gimbal servomotor
    -, собственно — engine itself
    -, средний (рис. 44) — center engine
    - стабилизации гироплатформы — stable platform-stabilization servomotor/servo/
    -, стартовый (работающий при взлете) — booster
    -, стартовый твердотопливный — solid propellant booster
    -, трехкаскадный, турбореактивный, с передним вентилятором — three-rotor /triple-spool, triple shaft/ front fan turbo-jet engine
    -, турбовентиляторный — turbofan engine
    двухконтурный турбореактивный двигатель, в котором часть воздуха выбрасывается за первыми ступенями компрессора низкого давления, а остальная часть воздуха за кнд поступает в основной контур с камерами сгорания. — in the turbofan engine a part of the air bypassed and exhausted to atmosphere after the first (two) stages of lp compressor. about half of the thrust is produced by the fan exhaust.
    -, турбовентиляторный (с дожиганием в вентиляторном контуре) — duct-burning turbofan engine
    -, турбовинтовентиляторный — (turbo) propfan engine, unducted fan engine (ufe)
    -, турбовинтовой (твд) — turboprop engine
    газотурбинный двигатель, в котором тепло превращается в кинетическую энергию реактивной струи и в механическую работу на валу двигателя, которая используется для вращения воздушного винта. — а turboprop engine is a turbine engine driving the propeller and developing an additional propulsive thrust by reaction to ejection of combustion products.
    -, "турбовинтовой" (вертолетный, с отбором мощности на вал) — turboshaft engine
    -, турбовинтовой, с толкающим винтом — pusher-turboprop engine
    -, турбопрямоточный — turbo/ram jet engine
    комбинация из турбореактивного (до м-з) и прямоточного (для больших чисел м). — combines а turbo-jet engine (for speeds up to mach 3) and ram jet engine for higher mach numbers.
    -,турбо-ракетный — turbo-rocket engine
    аналог турбопрямоточному двигателю с автономным кислородным питанием, — а turbo/ram jet engine with its own oxygen to provide combustion.
    -, турбореактивный — turbojet engine
    газотурбинный двигатель (с приводом компрессора от турбин), в котором тепло превращается только в кинетическую энергию реактивной струи. — a jet engine incorporating a turbine-driven air compressor to take in and compress the air for the combustion of fuel, the gases of combustion being used both to rotate the turbine and to create a thrust-producing jet.
    -, установленный в мотогондоле — nacelle-mounted engine
    -, установленный в подвесной мотогондоле — pod engine
    -, четырехтактный (поршневой — four-cycle engine
    за два оборота коленчатого вала происходит четыре хода поршня в каждом цилиндре, по одному такту на ход. такт 1 - впуск всасывание рабочей смеси в цилиндр), такт 2 - матке рабочей смеси, такт 3 - рабочий ход (зажигание смеси), такт 4 - выхлоп (выпуск отработанных газов из цилиндра в атмосферу) — a common type of engine which requires two revolutions of the crankshaft (four strokes of the piston) to complete the four events of (1) admission of or forcing the charged mixture of combustible gas into the cylinder, (2) compression of the charge, (3) ignition and burning of the charge, which develops pressure (power) acting on the piston and (4) exhaust or expulsion of the charge from the cylinder.
    -, шаговой (эл.) — step-servo motor
    -, электрический — electric motor
    устройство, преобразующее электрическую энергию во вращательное механическое движение. — device which converts electrical energy into rotating mechanical energy.
    - (-) энергоузел, газотурбинный (ггдэ) — turbine starter /auxiliary power unit, starter/ apu
    для запуска основн. двигателей, хол. прокрутки (стартерный режим) и привода агрегатов самолета при неработающих двигателях (режим энергоузла), имеет свой электростартер.
    в зоне д. — in the region of the engine
    выбег д. — engine run-down
    гонка д. — engine run
    данные д. — engine data
    заливка д. (пд перед запуском) — engine priming
    замена д. — engine replacement /change/
    запуск д. — engine start
    испытание д. — engine test
    мощность д. — engine power
    на входе в д. — at /in/ inlet to the engine
    обороты д. — engine speed /rpm, rpm/
    опробование д. — engine ground test
    опробование д. в полете — in-flight engine test
    опробование д. на земле — engine ground test
    останов д. (выключение) — engine shutdown
    остановка д. (отказ) — engine failure
    остановка д. (выбег) — run down
    остановка д. вслествие недостатка масла (топлива) — engine failure due to oil (fuel) starvation
    отказ д. — engine failure
    перебои в работе д. — rough engine operation
    подогрев д. — engine heating
    проба д. (на земле) — engine ground test
    прогрев д. — engine warm-up
    прокрутка д. (холодная) — engine cranking /motoring/
    работа д. — engine operation
    разгон д. — engine acceleration
    стоянка д. (период, в течение которого двигатель не работает) — engine shutdown. one hundred starts must be made of which 25 starts must be preceded by at least a two-hour engine shutdown.
    тряска д. — engine vibration
    тяга д. — engine thrust
    установка д. — engine installation
    шум д. — engine noise
    вывешивать д. с помощью лебедки — support weight of the engine by a hoist
    выводить д. на требуемые обороты % — accelerate the engine to a required speed of %
    выключать д. — shut down the engine
    глушить д. — shut down the engine
    гонять д. — run the engine
    заливать д. (пд) — prim the engine
    заменять д. — replace the engine
    запускать д. — start the engine
    запускать д. в воздухе — (re)start the engine
    испытывать д. — test the engine
    опробовать д. на земле — ground test the engine
    останавливать д. — shut down the engine
    подвешивать д. — mount the engine
    поднимать д. подъемником — hoist the engine
    подогревать д. — heat the engine
    проворачивать д. на... оборотов — turn the engine... revolutions
    прогревать д. (на оборотах...%) — warm up the engine (at a speed of... %)
    продопжать полет на (двух) д. — continue flight on (two) engines
    разгоняться на одном д. — accelerate with one engine operating
    разгоняться при неработающем критическом д. — accelerate with the critical епgine inoperative
    сбавлять (убирать) обороты (работающего) д. — decelerate the engine
    увеличивать обороты (работающего) д. — accelerate the engine
    устанавливать д. — install the engine

    Русско-английский сборник авиационно-технических терминов > двигатель

  • 116 механическая шпалоподбойка

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > механическая шпалоподбойка

  • 117 механическая щётка

    1) General subject: groomer
    2) Geology: push broom
    3) Engineering: brush, mechanical brush, sweeper
    4) Construction: mechanical sweeper
    5) Automobile industry: brusher (для чистки улиц), power broom (дорожная)
    6) Textile: brushing machine
    7) Automation: self-propelled brush
    8) Makarov: power sweeper

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > механическая щётка

  • 118 механический погрузчик

    2) Engineering: truck loader
    3) Mining: helldiver (для работы при углах падения до 50[deg]), mucking unit (руды или породы)

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > механический погрузчик

  • 119 погрузочная машина

    3) Mining: car loader (для погрузки ископаемого в вагонетки), loading shovel, mechanical mucker, muck loader, mucker, mucking device, mucking machine, power loading machine, shovel
    4) Metallurgy: handling machinery
    5) Gold mining: bogger ( Australian)

    Универсальный русско-английский словарь > погрузочная машина

  • 120 buen funcionamiento

    Ex. Mechanical breakdown or power failure may affect the smooth running of the system but they do not constitute disaster.
    * * *

    Ex: Mechanical breakdown or power failure may affect the smooth running of the system but they do not constitute disaster.

    Spanish-English dictionary > buen funcionamiento

См. также в других словарях:

  • Mechanical power — Механическая энергия …   Краткий толковый словарь по полиграфии

  • Mechanical engineering — Mechanical engineers design and build engines and power plants …   Wikipedia

  • Power steering — helps drivers steer vehicles by augmenting steering effort of the steering wheel. It does this by adding controlled energy to the steering mechanism, so the driver needs to provide only modest effort regardless of conditions. In particular, power …   Wikipedia

  • Mechanical powers — Power Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent;… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power — Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent; the… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power loom — Power Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent;… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power of a point — Power Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent;… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power of attorney — Power Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent;… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power press — Power Pow er, n. [OE. pouer, poer, OF. poeir, pooir, F. pouvoir, n. & v., fr. LL. potere, for L. posse, potesse, to be able, to have power. See {Possible}, {Potent}, and cf. {Posse comitatus}.] 1. Ability to act, regarded as latent or inherent;… …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Power transmission — is the movement of energy from its place of generation to a location where it is applied to performing useful work.Power is defined formally as units of energy per unit time.In SI units: 1 watt = 1 joule/s = 1 newton * metre/second… …   Wikipedia

  • power — n 1 Power, force, energy, strength, might, puissance mean the ability to exert effort for a purpose. Power is the most general of these terms and denotes an ability to act or be acted upon, to effect something, or to affect or be affected by… …   New Dictionary of Synonyms

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Прямая ссылка:
Нажмите правой клавишей мыши и выберите «Копировать ссылку»