-
21 пропустить
гл.1. to omit; 2. to drop; 3. to overlook; 4. to skip; 5. to turn a blind eye to; 6. to shut /to close one's eyes to; 7. to miss; 8. to admit; 9. to let in; 10. to let pass; 11. to keep out; 12. to passРусский глагол пропускать многозначен и относится к разным сферам человеческой жизни. Значения этого глагола различаются по характеру объектов, на которые направлено действие, что в русском языке проявляется в словосочетаниях, а в ряде случаев в разных приставках, например: впускать, опускать, пропускать. В английском языке все эти значения передаются отдельными словами.1. to omit — пропускать, пропустить, не включать, опускать (пропускать в речи или письме что-либо, например, имена, факты, названия, главным образом потому, что говорящий не считает это важным или не хочет это упоминать): We can omit this word. — Это слово можно опустить./Это слово можно пропустить. Her name was omitted in error. — Ее не внесли в список по ошибке./Ее имя было пропущено по ошибке. If you are a vegetarian, simply omit the chicken from your diet. — Если вы вегетарианец, исключите курицу из своего рациона. Your essay was quite good, but you omitted several important dates and events. — У вас хороший очерк, но вы пропустили несколько важных дат и событий./Ваш очерк хорош, но вы не упомянули несколько важных дат и событий. Some parts of the interview which I have included in my typescript were omitted from the published article. — В опубликованной статье были опушены/пропущены некоторые части моего интервью, которые я включил в рукопись.2. to drop — пропускать, пропустить, опускать (носит разговорный характер; пропуск может объясняться тем, что сведения уже потеряли значение, или уже нет времени на совершение чего-либо): I don't think this article will be of interest to our readers, let's drop it. — Думаю, эта статья не будет представлять интереса для наших читателей, давайте ее выбросим./Думаю, эта статья не будет представлять интереса для наших читателей, давайте ее пропустим./Думаю, эта статья не будет представлять интереса для наших читателей, давайте ее не будем печатать. I'm afraid we have run out of time, so we are going to have to drop our visit to Windsor castle from our schedule. — Боюсь, что у нас уже нет больше времени, и нам придется вычеркнуть из нашей программы посещение Виндзорского замка.3. to overlook — пропускать, пропустить, выпускать из виду, просматривать, просмотреть (не заметить что-либо важное, особенно из-за отсутствия времени): I overlooked the possibility. — Я упустил из виду эту возможность. I overlooked her name on the list. — Я пропустил ее имя в списке. Не always overlooks her fault. — Он всегда смотрел сквозь пальцы на ее ошибки./Он всегда смотрел сквозь пальцы на ее промахи. I'll overlook it this time. — На сей раз я закрою на это глаза. I'm sorry I'm behaving so badly, will you overlook it this time and forgive me? — Я очень сожалею, что так плохо веду себя, не обращайте на это внимания и простите меня на этот раз. Although it is his first offence, this cannot be overlooked. — Хотя это его первый проступок, он не может пройти незамеченным. Не lends to overlook any small faults the girl may have. — Он склонен к тому, чтобы не придавать значения мелким провинностям девочки./Он склонен смотреть сквозь пальцы на проступки этой девочки. 1 always check my work to see if there might be anything I have overlooked. — Я всегда проверяю свою работу, чтобы удостовериться, что ничего важного не пропустил. In chemistry it is easy to overlook a little factor and draw a wrong conclusion from the experiment. — В химии легко просмотреть какой-нибудь мелкий фактор, что может привести к ложным выводам./В химии легко пропустить какой-нибудь мелкий фактор, что может привести к ложным выводам./В химии легко не заметить какой-нибудь мелкий фактор, что может привести к ложным выводам.4. to skip — пропускать, пропустить (особенно то, что обычно делают или должны делать, из-за желания сделать что-либо другое): to skip school — прогуливать уроки. Let's skip the next chapter. — Давай пропустим следующую главу. I skipped lunch today. — Я сегодня не обедал. I skipped a grade/class at school. — Я перескочил в школе через класс. Bill likes to leave work early, so he skips lunch sometimes. — Билл предпочитает уходить с работы пораньше и поэтому пропускает обеденный перерыв./Билл предпочитает уходить с работы пораньше и поэтому не уходит на обеденный перерыв. I used to skip classes in the afternoon and go and visit my grandmother instead. — Я, бывало, пропускал уроки и бегал в гости к бабушке.5. to turn a blind eye to — пропускать, пропустить, не замечать, не придавать значения, смотреть сквозь пальцы, закрывать глаза на что-л. If my sister did something wrong, my mother always turned a blind eye to her. — Если сестра что-то делала не так, то мама всегда закрывала на это глаза. The guard turned a blind eye when the prisoners stole food from the kitchen. — Охранник делал вид, что не замечает, когда арестанты крали пищу из кухни./Охранник делал вид, что не замечает, как заключенные крали пищу из кухни. The government can't turn a blind eye to these incidents any longer. — Правительство больше не может закрывать глаза на эти инциденты.6. to shut/to close one's eyes to — пропускать, пропустить, закрывать глаза на что-либо, сознательно не замечать: Of course, it is tempting to criticize other countries and close/shut your eyes to all the problems of your own society. — Конечно, очень соблазнительно критиковать другие страны и не замечать своих проблем./Конечно, очень соблазнительно критиковать другие страны и закрывать глаза на проблемы своего общества.7. to miss — пропускать, пропустить, не замечать, упускать: She noticed a fault in the engine design which everybody had missed. — Она заметила недостаток в модели мотора, который все пропустили./Она заметила погрешность в модели мотора, которую никто не заметил. I moved the sofa when I was cleaning to see if I had missed any dust. — Когда я убирала, я отодвинула диван, чтобы убедиться, что не оставила там пыли. The shop is easily missed because its signboard has fallen off the entrance. — Мимо этого магазина легко пройти, потому что его вывеска упала./ Этот магазин легко не заметить, потому что его вывеска упала. Could you repeat what you said, I missed the last few words. — Повторите, пожалуйста, то, что вы сказали, я не расслышал последние несколько слов./Повторите, пожалуйста, то, что вы сказали, я пропустил последние несколько слов. I missed the last bus and had to walk all the way home. — Я не успел на последний автобус, и мне пришлось всю дорогу идти пешком./Я опоздал на последний автобус, и мне пришлось всю дорогу идти пешком. It is the biggest house in this street, you can't miss it. — Это самый большой дом на этой улице, вы мимо него не пройдете.8. to admit — пропускать, пропустить, разрешить войти (дать право/разрешение войти, особенно в общественные здания, такие как театры, музеи и т. н.): The audience is not being admitted. — Зрителей еще не впускают. We were not admitted. — Нас не пропустили./Нас не впустили. This ticket admits two people. — По этому билету можно пройти вдвоем. Late-comers not be admitted until the end of the first act. — Опоздавших не пускают в зал до конца первого акта.9. to let in — впускать, впустить: Draw the curtains aside and let the sun in. — Отодвинь занавески и впусти солнце. Let me in. — Впусти меня. Не opened the door and let us in. — Он открыл дверь и пропустил нас/ Он открыл дверь и впустил нас. The roof lets in the rain. — Крыша течет. The window barely lets in any light. — Окно еле пропускает свет.10. to let pass — пропускать, пропустить, дать пройти: I stepped aside to let her pass. — Я посторонился и дал ей пройти.11. to keep out — не пропускать: Please shut the doorlo keep out the cold. — Закрой дверь, не выстуживай комнату./Закрой дверь, не впускай холод.12. to pass — пропускать, пропустить, принимать, одобрять ( давать официальное право на что-либо): It is one of the strangest laws ever passed. — Это один из самых странных законов, который был когда-либо принят. The committee didn't pass his plan. — Комитет его план не пропустил./ Комитет не принял его план. Many laws passed by the Parliament are never enforced. — Многие законы, принятые парламентом, никогда не исполняются./Парламент одобряет много законов, которые никогда не исполняются. -
22 опыт
attempt, trial, experiment, experience, run, practice• В-третьих, опыт автора говорит, что... - Thirdly, it is the author's experience that... <• Выполнив опыт успешно, мы... - Having carried out the test successfully, we...• Данная формула хорошо согласуется с опытом. - This formula is in good agreement with the experiment.• Его карьера к данному моменту уже включает опыт в... - His career to date has included experience in...• Из нашего опыта мы знаем, что... - It is a matter of experience that...• Из опыта работы в индустрии ясно, что... - It is clear from experience within the industry that...• Из повседневного опыта мы знаем, что... - We learn from common experience that...• Из собственного опыта могу сообщить, что... - From personal experience, I can say that...• Каждодневный опыт предлагает... - Everyday experience suggests that...• Мы собираемся опираться на опыт читателя относительно... - We are going to rely on the reader's experience with...• Накапливая опыт, студенты узнают, как... - With practice the student will learn to...• Накопив достаточный опыт, пользователь должен быть способен... - With sufficient experience, the user should be able to...• Накопленный опыт начал нам указывать, что... - Our accumulated experience began to indicate that...• Наш опыт приводит нас к заключению, что... - Experience leads us to conclude that...;• Необходим опыт для... - It takes experience to...• Опыт автора говорит, что... - The author's experience suggests that...• Опыт говорит нам, что... - Our experience tells us that...• Опыт истории показывает, что... - Historical experience shows that...• Опыт показывает, что... - Experiment shows that...• Опыт учит нас, что... - Experience teaches us that...• Опыты, проведенные на животных,... - The experiments performed on animals are...• Профессор Смит был умелым исследователем с многолетним опытом в... - Prof. Smith was a skilled researcher who had many years of experience with...• Смит [1] имел многолетний опыт работы с... - Smith [1] had many years of experience dealing with... -
23 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
Страницы
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
run — run1 W1S1 [rʌn] v past tense ran [ræn] past participle run present participle running ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ 1¦(move quickly using your legs)¦ 2¦(race)¦ 3¦(organize/be in charge of )¦ 4¦(do something/go somewhere quickly)¦ 5¦(buses/trains etc)¦ … Dictionary of contemporary English
Experiment — Experimental redirects here. For the musical classification, see Experimental music. For other uses, see Experiment (disambiguation). Even very young children perform rudimentary experiments in order to learn about the world. An experiment is a… … Wikipedia
run — [[t]rʌ̱n[/t]] ♦ runs, running, ran (The form run is used in the present tense and is also the past participle of the verb.) 1) VERB When you run, you move more quickly than when you walk, for example because you are in a hurry to get somewhere,… … English dictionary
Run BASIC — is a BASIC language based web appserver. It is based on the popular Liberty BASIC language. Run BASIC v1.0 was released in Jan 2008. Run BASIC was developed by Shoptalk Systems, creators of the Liberty BASIC and Just BASIC compilers.Programming… … Wikipedia
experiment — {{Roman}}I.{{/Roman}} noun ADJECTIVE ▪ animal ▪ a few hippies protesting against animal experiments ▪ field, laboratory ▪ educational, medical … Collocations dictionary
This Year's Girl — Infobox Television episode Title=This Year s Girl Series=Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season=4 Episode=15 Airdate=February 22, 2000 Production=4ABB15 Writer=Douglas Petrie Director=Michael Gershman Episode list=List of Buffy the Vampire Slayer… … Wikipedia
Factorial experiment — In statistics, a factorial experiment is an experiment whose design consists of two or more factors, each with discrete possible values or levels , and whose experimental units take on all possible combinations of these levels across all such… … Wikipedia
Eötvös experiment — The Eötvös experiment was a famous physics experiment that measured the correlation between inertial mass and gravitational mass, demonstrating that the two were one and the same, something that had long been suspected but never demonstrated with … Wikipedia
Computer experiment — In the scientific context, a computer experiment refer to mathematical modeling using computer simulation. It has become common to call such experiments in silico. This area includes Computational physics, Computational chemistry, Computational… … Wikipedia
Schiehallion experiment — Schiehallion s isolated position and symmetrical shape lent well to the experiment The Schiehallion experiment was an 18th century experiment to determine the mean density of the Earth. Funded by a grant from the … Wikipedia
Pound-Rebka experiment — The Pound Rebka experiment is a well known experiment to test Albert Einstein s theory of general relativity. It was proposed by Robert Pound and G. A. Rebka Jr. in 1959, [cite journal|last=Pound| first=R. V.| coauthors = Rebka Jr. G. A. |… … Wikipedia
