-
81 bring smth. home to smb.
1) втолковать что-л. кому-л., довести что-л. до чьего-л. сознания, заставить кого-л. осознать что-лNever in my life... was the vast gap which divides the rich from the poor in America so vividly and forcefully brought home to me. (Th. Dreiser, ‘A Book about Myself’, ch. LX) — Никогда в жизни... пропасть, отделяющая богатых от бедных в Америке, не представала передо мной с такой очевидностью.
The growth of national consciousness in the more than fifty-five differently administered African states and islands, expecially since 1945, has stimulated political thinking and brought home even more to the African people how precarious could be the independence of a single African State standing in isolation from the rest of Africa. (J. Woddis, ‘Africa. The Way Ahead’, ch. VI) — Рост национального сознания на пятидесяти с лишним африканских территориях и островах, управлявшихся различными странами, особенно усилился после 1945 года; он стимулировал развитие политической мысли: африканцы еще острее почувствовали, насколько непрочной может оказаться независимость какого-нибудь отдельного африканского государства, если оно будет держаться изолированно от остальной Африки.
2) уличить кого-л. в чём-л. (особ. в преступлении)...although we suspected Davis it was not easy to bring the crime home to him as he always seemed to have an unimpeachable alibi. (A. Christie, ‘The Thirteen Problems’, ch. 2) —...хотя мы и подозревали Дэвиса, уличить его в совершении преступления было нелегко, так как у него всегда находилось безупречное алиби.
-
82 to
[tə], [tu]1. preposition1) towards; in the direction of:إلى، نَحْوَI went to the concert/lecture/play.
2) as far as:من البِدايَه إلى النِّهايَهHis story is a lie from beginning to end.
3) until:حَتّىDid you stay to the end of the concert?
4) sometimes used to introduce the indirect object of a verb:لِ، إلىYou're the only person I can talk to.
5) used in expressing various relations:Listen to me!
Did you reply to his letter?
Where's the key to this door?
تُسْتَعْمَل للتَّعْبير عن العُلاقَهHe sang to (the accompaniment of) his guitar.
6) into a particular state or condition:تُسْتَعْمَل للتَّعْبير عن حالَه مُعَيَّنَهShe tore the letter to pieces.
7) used in expressing comparison or proportion:تُسْتَعْمَل للتَّعْبير عن مُقارَنَه أو نِسْبَهWe won the match by 5 goals to 2.
تُسْتَعْمَل للتَّعْبير عن الهَدَف أو نَتيجَة العَمَلTo my horror, he took a gun out of his pocket.
9) [tə] used before an infinitive eg after various verbs and adjectives, or in other constructions:I want to go!
He worked hard to (= in order to) earn a lot of money
These buildings were designed to (= so as to) resist earthquakes
تُسْتَعْمَل قَبل صيغَة المَصْدَرI arrived too late to see him.
10) used instead of a complete infinitive:تُسْتَعْمَل بدلا من المَصْدَرHe asked her to stay but she didn't want to.
2. [tuː] adverb1) into a closed or almost closed position:الى حالَة الإقْفالHe pulled/pushed the door to.
2) used in phrasal verbs and compounds:تُسْتَعْمَل في الأفعال العِباريَّه والمُرَكَّبَهHe came to (= regained consciousness).
-
83 to
1. [tə,tu] preposition1) (towards; in the direction of: I cycled to the station; The book fell to the floor; I went to the concert/lecture/play.) à, vers2) (as far as: His story is a lie from beginning to end.) jusqu'à3) (until: Did you stay to the end of the concert?) jusqu'à4) (sometimes used to introduce the indirect object of a verb: He sent it to us; You're the only person I can talk to.) à5) (used in expressing various relations: Listen to me!; Did you reply to his letter?; Where's the key to this door?; He sang to (the accompaniment of) his guitar.) à; de6) (into a particular state or condition: She tore the letter to pieces.) en7) (used in expressing comparison or proportion: He's junior to me; Your skill is superior to mine; We won the match by 5 goals to 2.) que; à8) (showing the purpose or result of an action etc: He came quickly to my assistance; To my horror, he took a gun out of his pocket.) à9) ([tə] used before an infinitive eg after various verbs and adjectives, or in other constructions: I want to go!; He asked me to come; He worked hard to (= in order to) earn a lot of money; These buildings were designed to (= so as to) resist earthquakes; She opened her eyes to find him standing beside her; I arrived too late to see him.) de; pour10) (used instead of a complete infinitive: He asked her to stay but she didn't want to.)2. [tu:] adverb1) (into a closed or almost closed position: He pulled/pushed the door to.) de; fermer2) (used in phrasal verbs and compounds: He came to (= regained consciousness).) à• -
84 to
1. [tə,tu] preposition1) (towards; in the direction of: I cycled to the station; The book fell to the floor; I went to the concert/lecture/play.) para, a, em2) (as far as: His story is a lie from beginning to end.) até3) (until: Did you stay to the end of the concert?) até4) (sometimes used to introduce the indirect object of a verb: He sent it to us; You're the only person I can talk to.) para5) (used in expressing various relations: Listen to me!; Did you reply to his letter?; Where's the key to this door?; He sang to (the accompaniment of) his guitar.) de6) (into a particular state or condition: She tore the letter to pieces.) em7) (used in expressing comparison or proportion: He's junior to me; Your skill is superior to mine; We won the match by 5 goals to 2.) a8) (showing the purpose or result of an action etc: He came quickly to my assistance; To my horror, he took a gun out of his pocket.) a9) ([tə] used before an infinitive eg after various verbs and adjectives, or in other constructions: I want to go!; He asked me to come; He worked hard to (= in order to) earn a lot of money; These buildings were designed to (= so as to) resist earthquakes; She opened her eyes to find him standing beside her; I arrived too late to see him.) para10) (used instead of a complete infinitive: He asked her to stay but she didn't want to.)2. [tu:] adverb1) (into a closed or almost closed position: He pulled/pushed the door to.)2) (used in phrasal verbs and compounds: He came to (= regained consciousness).)• -
85 öz
1) (ismin əvvəlində müvafiq yiyəlik əvəzliyi)O öz dostları ilə görüşdü. – He met his friendsMən öz otağıma getdim. – I went to my room2) (qayıdış əvəzliyi kimi) selfözüm – myselfözü – himself, herself, itselfözümüz – ourselvesözünüz – yourselvesözləri – themselves3) yiyəlik əvəzliyi + ownOnun öz evi var. – He has his own houseÖz işinlə məşğul ol! – Mind your own businessöz kitabım – my own bookMən bu mətni özüm tərcümə etmişəm. – I've translated this text by myself/on my own◊ özünü karlığa vurmaq – pretend to be deafözünü yetirmək – just arrive in timeözünü öymək – brag, boastözünü çəkmək – be too proudözündən getmək – faint; lose consciousnessözünə gəlmək – come to oneselfözüdür ki, var! – exactly! -
86 бить(ся)
гл.1. to beat; 2. to strike; 3. to hit; 4. to tap; 5. to pat; 6. to rap; 7. to punch; 8. to thump; 9. to slap; 10. to knock; 11. to knock smb about/ around; 12. to club; 13. to kick; 14. to lash; 15. to pound; 16. to smackРусский глагол бить указывает на многократный характер действия, но не конкретизирует как, чем и по отношению к кому или чему было произведено это действие. Английские соответствия различают многократность и однократность действия и поэтому они эквивалентны не только глаголу бить, но и глаголам ударять/ударить и стучать/стукнуть. Кроме этого английские глаголы указывают и на то, как и чем наносятся удары.1. to beat — бить, биться, колотить, ударять, избить (подчеркивается многократность действия; разный характер ударов в русском языке может передаваться разными приставками, как, например, побить, избить и распространенными словосочетаниями; в английском языке в таких случаях используются послелоги или другие глаголы): to beat a carpet — выколачивать ковер; to beat a rug — вытряхивать половик; to beat the dust out of the rug — выбивать пыль из ковра; to beat a drum — бить в барабан; to beat time — отбивать такт; to beat eggs — взбивать яйца; to beat meat — отбивать мясо; to beat smb (up) — бить кого-либо/избивать кого-либо; to beat smb cruelly (to death) — жестоко (до смерти) избить кого-либо; to beat smb with a stick — избивать кого-либо палкой/бить кого-либо папкой; to beat smb for stealing (for lying) — побить кого-либо за воровство (за вранье); one's heart beats — сердце бьется. The rain beat the grass flat. — Дождь прибил траву. You ought to be well beaten. — Тебя надо как следует выпороть. The bird beats its wings against the cage. — Птица бьется крыльями в клетке. Не was badly beaten. — Его здорово избили./Ero сильно избили. We heard the waves beating against the shore. — Мы слышали, как волны, бились о берег. The rain beats against the roof. — Дождь бьет по крыше./Дождь стучит по крыше.2. to strike — ударять, ударить, стукнуть, нанести удар (упот- ребляется в официа.1ьной речи, описывает удар по какой-либо части тела): The evidence showed that the victim had been struck over the head with an iron bar. — Свидетельские показания указывают на то, что пострадавшему/жертве был нанесен удар по голове железным прутом. The clock was striking midnight. — Часы били полночь. Jane was on the point of striking the child again when her husband stopped her. — Джейн собиралась еще раз ударить ребенка, но муж остановил ее. The court heard that the defendant had struck Ted repeatedly in the face, causing serious bruising. — Суд заслушал свидетельские показания о том, что ответчик нанес Тэду многократные удары в лицо, избив его до синяков. Sergeant Morris struck the drum and the band started to march down the street. — Сержант Моррис ударил в барабан, и оркестр стал маршировать по улице. The lightning struck the tree. — Молния ударила в дерево./Молния попала в дерево.3. to hit — ударить, ударять, стукнуть (употребляется в обыденных ситуациях, чаще, чем to strike и обычно подразумевает одушевленное существительное в качестве подлежащего): to hit smb with smth — ударить кого-либо чем-либо (тем, что держат в руке) Peter keeps hitting me. — Петр постоянно меня бьет./Петр все время дает мне подзатыльники. She swung around and hit him with her umbrella. — Она круто развернулась и ударила его зонтиком. After she told him off to stop complaining he hit her over the head with a book. — После того, как она приказала ему перестать жаловаться, он ударил ее по голове книгой. Hitting him hard in the stomach she dashed for the phone and called the police. — Сильно ударив его в живот, она бросилась к телефону и вызвала полицию. Don't fight with your brother, he will only hit you back as he is older than you are. — He дерись с братом, он старше тебя и даст тебе сдачи./Не дерись с братом, он старше тебя и нанесет тебе ответный удар.4. to tap — ударять, ударить, стукнуть (легкий, негромкий стук или удар пальцами или ногой, постукивание): She tapped her foot in time to the music. — Она постукивала ногой в такт музыке. Не tapped his fingers on the arm of the chair. — Он легко постукивал пальцами по подлокотнику кресла. Не tapped her on the shoulder to attract her attention. — Он похлопал ее по плечу, чтобы привлечь внимание.5. to pat — похлопать, потрепать (так же как и глагол to tap, описывает легкий, негромкий стук или удар, легкое постукивание, как знак одобрения или ласки): She patted the child on the shoulder encouragingly. — Она ободряюще похлопала ребенка по плечу. Не patted the dog affectionately as he spoke. — Говоря, он ласково трепал свою собаку. You can pat yourself on the shoulder/arm for the well done job. — Вы можете похвалить себя за хорошо выполненную работу.6. to rap — ударить, стукнуть (в отличие от глаголов to tap и to pat — нанести резкий, отрывистый удар при неодобрении, раздражении или критике): She rapped the table with her hand and called for silence. — Она ударила рукой по столу, призывая к тишине. She rapped loudly on the door. — Она громко стукнула в дверь.7. to punch — нанести сильный удар кулаком ( в гневе или борьбе): I punched him on the jaw. — Я дал ему в челюсть. Не punched him on the nose. — Он дал ему по носу./Он заехал ему по носу. The woman claimed that she had been punched and kicked by one of the policeman. — Женщина заявила, что один из полицейских ударил ее кулаком и пнул ногой. Employees are protected by screens to stop the angry clients from punching them in the face. — Служащих от посетителей отделяет защитный экран, чтобы разъяренные клиенты не набросились на них с кулаками.8. to thump — сильно бить, биться, колотить, колотиться ( обо чтолибо), стукнуть, сильно ударить ( но не по голове или лицу), надавать тумаков: The chairman thumped the table for silence. — Председатель стукнул по столу, призывая к тишине. His heart (head) was thumping. — У него колотилось сердце (стучало в висках). Не was thumping on the door. — Он колотил в дверь. The teacher told Peter off for thumping the kids sitting next to him. — Учитель отчитывал Петра за то, что тот бил ребят, сидящих рядом. Steve choked and I thumped him on the back several times until he began to breathe. — Стив подавился, и я стукнул его несколько раз по спине, пока он не начал дышать. Не thumped him in the stomach and ran off. — Он ударил его в живот и убежал./Он стукнул его по животу и убежал. I tried to stop the fighting boys but only got thumped on my chest. — Я пыталась разнять дерущихся мальчишек, но только получила удар в грудь.9. to slap — дать пощечину, ударить по лицу, ударить наотмашь: She was so angry with her husband she was really tempted to slap him. — Она так рассердилась на мужа, что готова была ударить его по лицу/ Она так рассердилась на мужа, что готова была дать ему пощечину. She slapped him across the face and stormed out of the room. — Она отвесила ему звонкую пощечину и, разъяренная, вылетела из комнаты. I slapped his face a few times to see if he regained his consciousness. — Я несколько раз похлопала его по щеке, чтобы привести его в сознание.10. to knock — бить, стукать, стукнуть: They knocked him on the head. — Его ударили по голове./Его стукнули по голове. 1 knocked my head against/on a beam. — Я стукнулся головой о балку./ Я ударился головой о балку. Someone is knocking at the door. — Кто-то стучит в дверь. They knocked the bottom of the barrel out. — Они выбили дно бочки. She knocked the ball out of my hand. — Она выбила мяч у меня из рук. I knocked the cup flying off the table. — Я смахнул чашку со стола. 1). to knock smb about/around — ударить кого-либо несколько раз (особенно для того, чтобы напугать), толкать друг друга, тузить друг друга: The boys are knocking each other about in the yard. — Мальчики дерутся во дворе, толкая друг друга./Мальчики дерутся во дворе, мутузя друг друга. The car was badly knocked about. — Машина была сильно помята. Their father used to knock their mother about when he was drunk. — Когда отец бывал пьян, он бил их мать./Отец избивал их мать, когда бывал пьян.12. to club — стукнуть, ударить ( по голове) ( чем-либо тяжелым или палкой): The attacker clubbed the gas station attendant and escaped with the money. — Нападающий стукнул работника бензоколонки чем-то тяжелым по голове и убежал, забрав все деньги. They clubbed the boy to death. — Они забили мальчика до смерти.13. to kick — ударить, ударять, наподдать ногой, толкнуть ногой, пнуть, пинать, дрыгать ногами, отбиваться ногами: She kicked me under the table. — Она толкнула меня под столом ногой. The police kicked the door down. — Полицейские выбили ногами дверь. Billy was kicking a ball around the yard. — Билли гонял мяч по двору. Не got kicked in the face playing rugby. — Во время игры в регби ему попали ногой в лицо. The cow may kick a bit when you milk it. — Корова может лягнуть во время дойки. They danced and sang and kicked their legs high in the air. — Они пели и плясали, высоко вскидывая ноги. The baby kicked its legs and its mother could hardly dress it. — Ребенок болтал ногами, и мать с трудом его одевала./Ребенок дрыгал ногами, и мать с трудом его одевала.14. to lash — бить наотмашь, хлестать, стегать ( кнутом): The rain lashed her face. — Дождь хлестал ей в лицо. The waves lashed the shore. — Волны яростно бились о берег. The gale lashed violently against the window. — Шторм с силой ударял в окно./Шторм яростно бился в оконные рамы. The driver lashed the horse until it pulled the carriage out onto a drier place of the road. — Возница стегал лошадь до тех пор, пока она не вытащила воз на сухое место на дороге. The cows were lashing their tails to keep the gadflies away. — Коровы махали хвостами, отгоняя оводов.15. to pound — бить, биться, колотить, колотиться ( ударяясь о какую-либо поверхность), разбивать, толочь: The heavy sea pounded against the pier. — Штормовые волны бились о причал. Tomas pounded the door with his fists. — Томас колотил в дверь кулаками. Не pounded up the stairs in front of her. — Он, топоча, поднимался по лестнице впереди нее. She rushed home, her heart pounding with excitement. — Она ринулась домой, сердце ее колотилось в груди от возбуждения./Она ринулась домой, сердце ее билось в груди от волнения. Pound the almonds and mix with bread crumbs. — Растолките миндаль и смешайте его с хлебной крошкой.16. to smack — шлепать, нашлепать, чавкать, чмокать ( губами) (обозначает легкий удар по какой-либо поверхности, сопровождаемый звуком): То bed now, or I'll smack your bottom! — Немедленно в постель, а то я тебя отшлепаю! Не smacked his fist against his palm. — Он (с досадой, в восторге) ударил кулаком по ладони. Не smelled the air and smacked his lips with expectation. — Он втянул носом воздух и почмокал губами в предвкушении еды. A piece of plaster smacked against the floor. — Кусок штукатурки шмякнулся на пол. -
87 Computers
The brain has been compared to a digital computer because the neuron, like a switch or valve, either does or does not complete a circuit. But at that point the similarity ends. The switch in the digital computer is constant in its effect, and its effect is large in proportion to the total output of the machine. The effect produced by the neuron varies with its recovery from [the] refractory phase and with its metabolic state. The number of neurons involved in any action runs into millions so that the influence of any one is negligible.... Any cell in the system can be dispensed with.... The brain is an analogical machine, not digital. Analysis of the integrative activities will probably have to be in statistical terms. (Lashley, quoted in Beach, Hebb, Morgan & Nissen, 1960, p. 539)It is essential to realize that a computer is not a mere "number cruncher," or supercalculating arithmetic machine, although this is how computers are commonly regarded by people having no familiarity with artificial intelligence. Computers do not crunch numbers; they manipulate symbols.... Digital computers originally developed with mathematical problems in mind, are in fact general purpose symbol manipulating machines....The terms "computer" and "computation" are themselves unfortunate, in view of their misleading arithmetical connotations. The definition of artificial intelligence previously cited-"the study of intelligence as computation"-does not imply that intelligence is really counting. Intelligence may be defined as the ability creatively to manipulate symbols, or process information, given the requirements of the task in hand. (Boden, 1981, pp. 15, 16-17)The task is to get computers to explain things to themselves, to ask questions about their experiences so as to cause those explanations to be forthcoming, and to be creative in coming up with explanations that have not been previously available. (Schank, 1986, p. 19)In What Computers Can't Do, written in 1969 (2nd edition, 1972), the main objection to AI was the impossibility of using rules to select only those facts about the real world that were relevant in a given situation. The "Introduction" to the paperback edition of the book, published by Harper & Row in 1979, pointed out further that no one had the slightest idea how to represent the common sense understanding possessed even by a four-year-old. (Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1986, p. 102)A popular myth says that the invention of the computer diminishes our sense of ourselves, because it shows that rational thought is not special to human beings, but can be carried on by a mere machine. It is a short stop from there to the conclusion that intelligence is mechanical, which many people find to be an affront to all that is most precious and singular about their humanness.In fact, the computer, early in its career, was not an instrument of the philistines, but a humanizing influence. It helped to revive an idea that had fallen into disrepute: the idea that the mind is real, that it has an inner structure and a complex organization, and can be understood in scientific terms. For some three decades, until the 1940s, American psychology had lain in the grip of the ice age of behaviorism, which was antimental through and through. During these years, extreme behaviorists banished the study of thought from their agenda. Mind and consciousness, thinking, imagining, planning, solving problems, were dismissed as worthless for anything except speculation. Only the external aspects of behavior, the surface manifestations, were grist for the scientist's mill, because only they could be observed and measured....It is one of the surprising gifts of the computer in the history of ideas that it played a part in giving back to psychology what it had lost, which was nothing less than the mind itself. In particular, there was a revival of interest in how the mind represents the world internally to itself, by means of knowledge structures such as ideas, symbols, images, and inner narratives, all of which had been consigned to the realm of mysticism. (Campbell, 1989, p. 10)[Our artifacts] only have meaning because we give it to them; their intentionality, like that of smoke signals and writing, is essentially borrowed, hence derivative. To put it bluntly: computers themselves don't mean anything by their tokens (any more than books do)-they only mean what we say they do. Genuine understanding, on the other hand, is intentional "in its own right" and not derivatively from something else. (Haugeland, 1981a, pp. 32-33)he debate over the possibility of computer thought will never be won or lost; it will simply cease to be of interest, like the previous debate over man as a clockwork mechanism. (Bolter, 1984, p. 190)t takes us a long time to emotionally digest a new idea. The computer is too big a step, and too recently made, for us to quickly recover our balance and gauge its potential. It's an enormous accelerator, perhaps the greatest one since the plow, twelve thousand years ago. As an intelligence amplifier, it speeds up everything-including itself-and it continually improves because its heart is information or, more plainly, ideas. We can no more calculate its consequences than Babbage could have foreseen antibiotics, the Pill, or space stations.Further, the effects of those ideas are rapidly compounding, because a computer design is itself just a set of ideas. As we get better at manipulating ideas by building ever better computers, we get better at building even better computers-it's an ever-escalating upward spiral. The early nineteenth century, when the computer's story began, is already so far back that it may as well be the Stone Age. (Rawlins, 1997, p. 19)According to weak AI, the principle value of the computer in the study of the mind is that it gives us a very powerful tool. For example, it enables us to formulate and test hypotheses in a more rigorous and precise fashion than before. But according to strong AI the computer is not merely a tool in the study of the mind; rather the appropriately programmed computer really is a mind in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states. And according to strong AI, because the programmed computer has cognitive states, the programs are not mere tools that enable us to test psychological explanations; rather, the programs are themselves the explanations. (Searle, 1981b, p. 353)What makes people smarter than machines? They certainly are not quicker or more precise. Yet people are far better at perceiving objects in natural scenes and noting their relations, at understanding language and retrieving contextually appropriate information from memory, at making plans and carrying out contextually appropriate actions, and at a wide range of other natural cognitive tasks. People are also far better at learning to do these things more accurately and fluently through processing experience.What is the basis for these differences? One answer, perhaps the classic one we might expect from artificial intelligence, is "software." If we only had the right computer program, the argument goes, we might be able to capture the fluidity and adaptability of human information processing. Certainly this answer is partially correct. There have been great breakthroughs in our understanding of cognition as a result of the development of expressive high-level computer languages and powerful algorithms. However, we do not think that software is the whole story.In our view, people are smarter than today's computers because the brain employs a basic computational architecture that is more suited to deal with a central aspect of the natural information processing tasks that people are so good at.... hese tasks generally require the simultaneous consideration of many pieces of information or constraints. Each constraint may be imperfectly specified and ambiguous, yet each can play a potentially decisive role in determining the outcome of processing. (McClelland, Rumelhart & Hinton, 1986, pp. 3-4)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Computers
-
88 Philosophy
And what I believe to be more important here is that I find in myself an infinity of ideas of certain things which cannot be assumed to be pure nothingness, even though they may have perhaps no existence outside of my thought. These things are not figments of my imagination, even though it is within my power to think of them or not to think of them; on the contrary, they have their own true and immutable natures. Thus, for example, when I imagine a triangle, even though there may perhaps be no such figure anywhere in the world outside of my thought, nor ever have been, nevertheless the figure cannot help having a certain determinate nature... or essence, which is immutable and eternal, which I have not invented and which does not in any way depend upon my mind. (Descartes, 1951, p. 61)Let us console ourselves for not knowing the possible connections between a spider and the rings of Saturn, and continue to examine what is within our reach. (Voltaire, 1961, p. 144)As modern physics started with the Newtonian revolution, so modern philosophy starts with what one might call the Cartesian Catastrophe. The catastrophe consisted in the splitting up of the world into the realms of matter and mind, and the identification of "mind" with conscious thinking. The result of this identification was the shallow rationalism of l'esprit Cartesien, and an impoverishment of psychology which it took three centuries to remedy even in part. (Koestler, 1964, p. 148)It has been made of late a reproach against natural philosophy that it has struck out on a path of its own, and has separated itself more and more widely from the other sciences which are united by common philological and historical studies. The opposition has, in fact, been long apparent, and seems to me to have grown up mainly under the influence of the Hegelian philosophy, or, at any rate, to have been brought out into more distinct relief by that philosophy.... The sole object of Kant's "Critical Philosophy" was to test the sources and the authority of our knowledge, and to fix a definite scope and standard for the researches of philosophy, as compared with other sciences.... [But Hegel's] "Philosophy of Identity" was bolder. It started with the hypothesis that not only spiritual phenomena, but even the actual world-nature, that is, and man-were the result of an act of thought on the part of a creative mind, similar, it was supposed, in kind to the human mind.... The philosophers accused the scientific men of narrowness; the scientific men retorted that the philosophers were crazy. And so it came about that men of science began to lay some stress on the banishment of all philosophic influences from their work; while some of them, including men of the greatest acuteness, went so far as to condemn philosophy altogether, not merely as useless, but as mischievous dreaming. Thus, it must be confessed, not only were the illegitimate pretensions of the Hegelian system to subordinate to itself all other studies rejected, but no regard was paid to the rightful claims of philosophy, that is, the criticism of the sources of cognition, and the definition of the functions of the intellect. (Helmholz, quoted in Dampier, 1966, pp. 291-292)Philosophy remains true to its classical tradition by renouncing it. (Habermas, 1972, p. 317)I have not attempted... to put forward any grand view of the nature of philosophy; nor do I have any such grand view to put forth if I would. It will be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the history of "howlers" and progress in philosophy as the debunking of howlers. It will also be obvious that I do not agree with those who see philosophy as the enterprise of putting forward a priori truths about the world.... I see philosophy as a field which has certain central questions, for example, the relation between thought and reality.... It seems obvious that in dealing with these questions philosophers have formulated rival research programs, that they have put forward general hypotheses, and that philosophers within each major research program have modified their hypotheses by trial and error, even if they sometimes refuse to admit that that is what they are doing. To that extent philosophy is a "science." To argue about whether philosophy is a science in any more serious sense seems to me to be hardly a useful occupation.... It does not seem to me important to decide whether science is philosophy or philosophy is science as long as one has a conception of both that makes both essential to a responsible view of the world and of man's place in it. (Putnam, 1975, p. xvii)What can philosophy contribute to solving the problem of the relation [of] mind to body? Twenty years ago, many English-speaking philosophers would have answered: "Nothing beyond an analysis of the various mental concepts." If we seek knowledge of things, they thought, it is to science that we must turn. Philosophy can only cast light upon our concepts of those things.This retreat from things to concepts was not undertaken lightly. Ever since the seventeenth century, the great intellectual fact of our culture has been the incredible expansion of knowledge both in the natural and in the rational sciences (mathematics, logic).The success of science created a crisis in philosophy. What was there for philosophy to do? Hume had already perceived the problem in some degree, and so surely did Kant, but it was not until the twentieth century, with the Vienna Circle and with Wittgenstein, that the difficulty began to weigh heavily. Wittgenstein took the view that philosophy could do no more than strive to undo the intellectual knots it itself had tied, so achieving intellectual release, and even a certain illumination, but no knowledge. A little later, and more optimistically, Ryle saw a positive, if reduced role, for philosophy in mapping the "logical geography" of our concepts: how they stood to each other and how they were to be analyzed....Since that time, however, philosophers in the "analytic" tradition have swung back from Wittgensteinian and even Rylean pessimism to a more traditional conception of the proper role and tasks of philosophy. Many analytic philosophers now would accept the view that the central task of philosophy is to give an account, or at least play a part in giving an account, of the most general nature of things and of man. (Armstrong, 1990, pp. 37-38)8) Philosophy's Evolving Engagement with Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive ScienceIn the beginning, the nature of philosophy's engagement with artificial intelligence and cognitive science was clear enough. The new sciences of the mind were to provide the long-awaited vindication of the most potent dreams of naturalism and materialism. Mind would at last be located firmly within the natural order. We would see in detail how the most perplexing features of the mental realm could be supported by the operations of solely physical laws upon solely physical stuff. Mental causation (the power of, e.g., a belief to cause an action) would emerge as just another species of physical causation. Reasoning would be understood as a kind of automated theorem proving. And the key to both was to be the depiction of the brain as the implementation of multiple higher level programs whose task was to manipulate and transform symbols or representations: inner items with one foot in the physical (they were realized as brain states) and one in the mental (they were bearers of contents, and their physical gymnastics were cleverly designed to respect semantic relationships such as truth preservation). (A. Clark, 1996, p. 1)Socrates of Athens famously declared that "the unexamined life is not worth living," and his motto aptly explains the impulse to philosophize. Taking nothing for granted, philosophy probes and questions the fundamental presuppositions of every area of human inquiry.... [P]art of the job of the philosopher is to keep at a certain critical distance from current doctrines, whether in the sciences or the arts, and to examine instead how the various elements in our world-view clash, or fit together. Some philosophers have tried to incorporate the results of these inquiries into a grand synoptic view of the nature of reality and our human relationship to it. Others have mistrusted system-building, and seen their primary role as one of clarifications, or the removal of obstacles along the road to truth. But all have shared the Socratic vision of using the human intellect to challenge comfortable preconceptions, insisting that every aspect of human theory and practice be subjected to continuing critical scrutiny....Philosophy is, of course, part of a continuing tradition, and there is much to be gained from seeing how that tradition originated and developed. But the principal object of studying the materials in this book is not to pay homage to past genius, but to enrich one's understanding of central problems that are as pressing today as they have always been-problems about knowledge, truth and reality, the nature of the mind, the basis of right action, and the best way to live. These questions help to mark out the territory of philosophy as an academic discipline, but in a wider sense they define the human predicament itself; they will surely continue to be with us for as long as humanity endures. (Cottingham, 1996, pp. xxi-xxii)10) The Distinction between Dionysian Man and Apollonian Man, between Art and Creativity and Reason and Self- ControlIn his study of ancient Greek culture, The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche drew what would become a famous distinction, between the Dionysian spirit, the untamed spirit of art and creativity, and the Apollonian, that of reason and self-control. The story of Greek civilization, and all civilizations, Nietzsche implied, was the gradual victory of Apollonian man, with his desire for control over nature and himself, over Dionysian man, who survives only in myth, poetry, music, and drama. Socrates and Plato had attacked the illusions of art as unreal, and had overturned the delicate cultural balance by valuing only man's critical, rational, and controlling consciousness while denigrating his vital life instincts as irrational and base. The result of this division is "Alexandrian man," the civilized and accomplished Greek citizen of the later ancient world, who is "equipped with the greatest forces of knowledge" but in whom the wellsprings of creativity have dried up. (Herman, 1997, pp. 95-96)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Philosophy
Страницы
См. также в других словарях:
Consciousness Explained — Author(s) Daniel C. Dennett … Wikipedia
Consciousness — Representation of consciousness from the seventeenth century. Consciousness is a term that refers to the relati … Wikipedia
Consciousness-based healthcare — (CBH), an emerging field of complementary and alternative medicine, is the application of consciousness based interventions to achieve tangible, beneficial outcomes across a wide range of health concerns including physical and emotional issues.… … Wikipedia
Consciousness — • In its widest sense it includes all sensations, thoughts, feelings, and volitions, in fact the sum total of mental life Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Consciousness Consciousness … Catholic encyclopedia
Consciousness raising — (often abbreviated c.r. or CR) is a form of political activism, pioneered by United States feminists in the late 1960s. It often takes the form of a group of people attempting to focus the attention of a wider group of people on some cause or… … Wikipedia
Consciousness Evolving — is a book written by the Professor James H. Fetzer. It is collection of studies on the past, the present, and the future of consciousness.[1] References ^ John Benjamins: Book details for Consciousness Evolving [AiCR 34] … Wikipedia
consciousness — noun 1 being able to see/hear/feel things ADJECTIVE ▪ full ▪ higher ▪ to aspire to a higher consciousness ▪ cosmic, divine ▪ … Collocations dictionary
Book of Revelation — For other uses, see Book of Revelation (disambiguation). Books of the New Testament … Wikipedia
Consciousness and Cognition — The journal Consciousness and Cognition (ISSN 1053 8100) provides a forum for scientific approaches to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self.[1] It features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) … Wikipedia
Book of Shadows (Charmed) — Infobox Charmed Artifact Title=The Book of Shadows First=Something Wicca This Way Comes Last=Forever Charmed Creator=Constance M. Burge Name=The Halliwell Book of Shadows Status=Intact Kind=Magical tome Affiliation=It was created by Melinda… … Wikipedia
Level of consciousness — (LOC) is a measurement of a person s arousability and responsiveness to stimuli from the environment.cite book |author=Kandel ER, Jessell, Thomas M.; Schwartz, James H. |title=Principles of neural science |publisher=McGraw Hill |location=New York … Wikipedia
