-
1 Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
юр., брит. "Эбесси против комиссара полиции метрополии"* (название судебного прецедента 1990 г.; cуд пришел к выводу, что арест является незаконным, если лицо, подвергшееся аресту, не информируется о его причинах)Syn:See:Англо-русский экономический словарь > Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
-
2 civil rights
1) юр. гражданские права (права человека на какие-л. действия, учрежденные каким-л. законом или конституцией и принадлежащие человеку благодаря тому, что он является гражданином какого-л. государства)Syn:Ant:freedom of information, freedom of petition, freedom of movement, political right, Marshall, Thomas HumphreySee:cultural rights, ecological rights, economic rights, freedom of association, freedom of expression, freedom of information, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, freedom of petition, liberal rights, freedom of conscience, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, personal rights, political right, social rights, human rights, civic affairs, civil duty, civic education, civics, civil death, civil disobedience, civil rights movement, civitas, constitution, constitutional contract, disenfranchise, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom2) юр. гражданское право (в типологии Т. Х. Маршалла: право на волеизъявление, право на информацию, свобода объединений, равенство перед законом)See:freedom of information, freedom of petition, freedom of movement, political right, Marshall, Thomas Humphrey
* * *
гражданские права (напр., право владеть собственностью).* * ** * *. . Словарь экономических терминов . -
3 1 WLR 385
-
4 human rights
пол. права человека (права, которые принадлежат каждому человеку в силу его принадлежности к человеческим существам, а не в силу какого-л. закона; точного определения эти прав не существует, хотя можно говорить о некотором общем понимании прав человека в большинстве стран)See:civil rights, euthanasia, natural law, Volksrechte, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom -
5 precedent
1. прил.общ. предшествующий2. сущ.юр. прецедент (решение суда, служащее образцом при решении аналогичных дел в системе англосаксонского права; в системе английского права формулируется как решение высших судов, имеющее обязательную силу как для них самих, так и для низших судов; на практике это означает, что решения палаты лордов не могут игнорироваться нижестоящими судами; решения Апелляционного суда должны применяться в дальнейшем всеми судами, кроме палаты лордов; Высокий суд выносит решения, которые обязательны для все судов, кроме палаты лордов и Апелляционного суда; прецеденты публикуются в специальных сборниках, как правило, называющихся law reports; институты договорного права, ответственности за нарушение обязательств регулируются исключительно прецедентами)to constitute [create, establish\] a precedent — создавать прецедент
Syn:See:binding precedent, persuasive precedent, Abbassy v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom, Abulaziz, Cabalos and Balkandali v United Kingdom -
6 Weekly Law Reports
док.юр., брит. "Еженедельные судебные отчеты", "Уикли Ло Рипотс" (серийное издание, в котором публикуются решения высших судебных инстанций, на которые ссылаются как на прецеденты в последующих судебных постановлениях; судебные прецеденты упорядочены по темам и хронологии и каждому судебному прецеденту присвоен номер; является изданием частного характера)See:
Перевод: с английского на русский
с русского на английский- С русского на:
- Английский
- С английского на:
- Русский
